The influence of pitch feedback on learning of motor -timing and sequencing: A piano study with novices

Audio-motor coordination is a fundamental requirement in the learning and execution of sequential actions such as music performance. Predictive motor control mechanisms determine the sequential content and timing of upcoming tones and thereby facilitate accurate performance. To study the role of auditory-motor predictions at early stages of acquiring piano performance skills, we conducted an experiment in which non-musicians learned to play a musical sequence on the piano in synchrony with a metronome. Three experimental conditions compared errors and timing. The first consisted of normal auditory feedback using conventional piano key-to-tone mappings. The second employed fixed-pitch auditory feedback consisting of a single tone that was given with each key stroke. In the third condition, for each key stroke a tone was randomly drawn from the set of tones associated with the normal sequence. The results showed that when auditory feedback tones were randomly assigned, participants produced more sequencing errors (i.e., a higher percentage of incorrect key strokes) compared to when auditory feedback was normal or consisted of a single tone of fixed pitch. Furthermore, synchronization with the metronome was most accurate in the fixed-pitch single-tone condition. These findings suggest that predictive motor control mechanisms support sequencing and timing, and that these sensorimotor processes are dissociable even at early stages of acquiring complex motor skills such as music performance.

[1]  Gabriel Curio,et al.  Cingulate and cerebellar beta oscillations are engaged in the acquisition of auditory‐motor sequences , 2017, Human brain mapping.

[2]  Markus Lappe,et al.  Differential processing of melodic, rhythmic and simple tone deviations in musicians -an MEG study , 2016, NeuroImage.

[3]  Peter Howell,et al.  Timing interference to speech in altered listening conditions. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  W. Thompson,et al.  Ideomotor effects of pitch on continuation tapping , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  Peter Q. Pfordresher,et al.  Effects of delayed auditory feedback on timing of music performance , 2002, Psychological research.

[6]  C. Palmer Music performance. , 1997, Annual review of psychology.

[7]  Peter Q Pfordresher,et al.  Auditory feedback in music performance: the role of melodic structure and musical skill. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  E. Altenmüller,et al.  Expert pianists do not listen: The expertise-dependent influence of temporal perturbation on the production of sequential movements , 2014, Neuroscience.

[9]  Peter Q Pfordresher,et al.  Auditory feedback in music performance: the role of transition-based similarity. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  Peter Q. Pfordresher,et al.  Coordination of perception and action in music performance , 2006 .

[11]  Robert Zivadinov,et al.  Brain responses to altered auditory feedback during musical keyboard production: An fMRI study , 2014, Brain Research.

[12]  Bruno L. Giordano,et al.  Spatial representation of pitch height: the SMARC effect , 2006, Cognition.

[13]  Peter Q. Pfordresher,et al.  Making and monitoring errors based on altered auditory feedback , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[14]  María Herrojo Ruiz,et al.  Detecting wrong notes in advance: neuronal correlates of error monitoring in pianists. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  S. Finney,et al.  Auditory Feedback and Musical Keyboard Performance , 1997 .

[16]  C. Palmer,et al.  Auditory feedback and memory for music performance: Sound evidence for an encoding effect , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[17]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Role of auditory feedback in the control of successive keystrokes during piano playing , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  C. Pantev,et al.  Rhythmic and melodic deviations in musical sequences recruit different cortical areas for mismatch detection , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[19]  Geraint A. Wiggins,et al.  EXPECTATION IN MELODY: THE INFLUENCE OF CONTEXT AND LEARNING , 2006 .

[20]  Uta Noppeney,et al.  Long-term music training tunes how the brain temporally binds signals from multiple senses , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Hand kinematics of piano playing. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  Peter Q. Pfordresher,et al.  The dynamics of disruption from altered auditory feedback: Further evidence for a dissociation of sequencing and timing. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  P. Keller,et al.  Action Planning in Sequential Skills: Relations to Music Performance , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[24]  B. Repp,et al.  Performed or observed keyboard actions affect pianists’ judgements of relative pitch , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[25]  R. Jackendoff,et al.  A Generative Theory of Tonal Music , 1985 .

[26]  Peter E. Keller,et al.  A conceptual review on action-perception coupling in the musicians’ brain: what is it good for? , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[27]  Caroline Palmer,et al.  Rate Effects on Timing, Key Velocity, and Finger Kinematics in Piano Performance , 2011, PloS one.

[28]  Caroline Palmer,et al.  Auditory and motor imagery modulate learning in music performance , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[29]  J. Morais,et al.  Spatial associations for musical stimuli: a piano in the head? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  Peter E Keller,et al.  Mental imagery in music performance: underlying mechanisms and potential benefits , 2012, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[31]  B. Repp Effects of Auditory Feedback Deprivation on Expressive Piano Performance , 1999 .