Assessing economic consequences of foot disorders in dairy cattle using a dynamic stochastic simulation model.

Foot disorders are an important health problem in dairy cattle, in terms of economics and animal welfare. The incidence, severity, and duration of foot disorders account for their importance. Prevalence of both subclinical and clinical foot disorders is high. More insight into the economic consequences could increase awareness among dairy farmers and could be an incentive for them to take action on this problem of animal welfare. The objective of this research was to estimate the economic consequences of different types of foot disorders, both clinical and subclinical. A dynamic stochastic Monte Carlo simulation model was used, taking into account the different types of foot disorders. The economic consequences of the foot disorders modeled were costs due to milk production losses, culling, prolonged calving interval, labor of the dairy farmer and the foot trimmer, visits of a veterinarian, treatment, and discarded milk. Under the milk quota system in The Netherlands, costs due to foot disorders for a default farm with 65 cows averaged $4,899 per year (ranging from $3,217 to $7,001), an annual loss of $75 per cow. This calculation implies that the costs due to foot disorders are more substantial than farmers might think. The costs of subclinical foot disorders account for 32% of all costs due to foot disorders. The costs due to foot disorders that are present without treatment or detection by the farmer are considerable. This finding implies that farmers might underestimate the benefits of taking action earlier and more thoroughly. A clinical foot disorder costs, on average, $95, and a subclinical foot disorder $18. The highest costs classified by foot disorder were those due to digital dermatitis, which has a high incidence and relatively high clinical prevalence. The highest costs classified by cost factor were those due to milk production losses and culling. Sensitivity analysis showed that variables regarding milk production were important for economic costs due to foot disorders. Furthermore, the probability of getting a foot disorder and probability of cure were important for estimating the costs due to foot disorders. Farmer awareness concerning dairy cow foot health and taking action more thoroughly, therefore, could reduce the economic consequences and improve welfare simultaneously.

[1]  H. Erb,et al.  Visual locomotion scoring in the first seventy days in milk: impact on pregnancy and survival. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[2]  L. Green,et al.  Assessment of the welfare of dairy caftle using animal-based measurements: direct observations and investigation of farm records , 2003, Veterinary Record.

[3]  E. Noordhuizen-Stassen,et al.  Risk factors for interdigital dermatitis and heel erosion in dairy cows kept in cubicle houses in The Netherlands. , 2005, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[4]  Henk Hogeveen,et al.  Costs of mastitis: facts and perception , 2008, Journal of Dairy Research.

[5]  W. Klee,et al.  Histological and bacteriological evaluation of digital dermatitis in cattle, with special reference to spirochaetes and Campylobacter faecalis , 1997, Veterinary Record.

[6]  L. Green,et al.  The impact of clinical lameness on the milk yield of dairy cows. , 2002, Journal of dairy science.

[7]  M. Endres,et al.  Prevalence of lameness in high-producing holstein cows housed in freestall barns in Minnesota. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[8]  L. Green,et al.  Associations between sole ulcer, white line disease and digital dermatitis and the milk yield of 1824 dairy cows on 30 dairy cow farms in England and Wales from February 2003-November 2004. , 2008, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[9]  P. D. P. WOOD,et al.  Algebraic Model of the Lactation Curve in Cattle , 1967, Nature.

[10]  A. Macrae,et al.  Disposal and disease rates in British dairy herds between April 1998 and March 2002 , 2004, Veterinary Record.

[11]  R. Esslemont,et al.  The costs of production diseases in dairy herds in England. , 1997, Veterinary journal.

[12]  D. Döpfer,et al.  Clinical course of digital dermatitis lesions in an endemically infected herd without preventive herd strategies. , 2008, Veterinary journal.

[13]  R. Huirne,et al.  Economic losses due to clinical lameness in dairy cattle , 1997 .

[14]  K. Frankena,et al.  Herd- and cow-level prevalence of digital dermatitis in the Netherlands and associated risk factors. , 2006, Journal of dairy science.

[15]  N. Neerchal,et al.  Objective determination of claw pain and its relationship to limb locomotion score in dairy cattle. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[16]  H. Seegers,et al.  Effect of disease on reproduction in the dairy cow: a meta-analysis. , 2000, Theriogenology.

[17]  R. Blowey,et al.  Color Atlas of Diseases and Disorders of Cattle , 1991 .

[18]  O. Østerås,et al.  Bovine claw and limb disorders at claw trimming related to milk yield. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[19]  L. Green,et al.  A longitudinal field trial of the effect of biotin on lameness in dairy cows. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[20]  L. Warnick,et al.  Strategies to analyze milk losses caused by diseases with potential incidence throughout the lactation: a lameness example. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[21]  T. Knowles,et al.  The development, implementation and testing of a lameness control programme based on HACCP principles and designed for heifers on dairy farms. , 2009, Veterinary journal.

[22]  Jan Hultgren,et al.  The effect of claw trimming on the hoof health of Swedish dairy cattle. , 2002, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[23]  W. Schouten,et al.  The effect of digital lesions and floor type on locomotion score in Dutch dairy cows. , 2009, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[24]  Y T Gröhn,et al.  The effect of lameness on milk production in dairy cows. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[25]  D. Kelton,et al.  Herd- and cow-level prevalence of foot lesions in Ontario dairy cattle. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[26]  F. Manson,et al.  Incidence and prevalence of lameness in dairy cattle , 1996, Veterinary Record.

[27]  R. Bicalho,et al.  Association between a visual and an automated locomotion score in lactating Holstein cows. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[28]  F. Manson,et al.  The influence of concentrate amount on locomotion and clinical lameness in dairy cattle , 1988 .

[29]  E. Noordhuizen-Stassen,et al.  Risk factors for digital dermatitis in dairy cows kept in cubicle houses in The Netherlands. , 2005, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[30]  E N Noordhuizen-Stassen,et al.  Prevalence of claw disorders in Dutch dairy cows exposed to several floor systems. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.

[31]  A R Kristensen,et al.  Optimal replacement of mastitic cows determined by a hierarchic Markov process. , 1994, Journal of dairy science.

[32]  Stochastic modeling to determine the economic effects of blanket, selective, and no dry cow therapy. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[33]  L. Warnick,et al.  Effect of lameness on culling in dairy cows. , 2004, Journal of dairy science.

[34]  S. Thamsborg,et al.  Prevalence of foot lesions in Danish Holstein cows , 2008, Veterinary Record.

[35]  C. Bergsten Causes, Risk Factors, and Prevention of Laminitis and Related Claw Lesions , 2003, Acta veterinaria Scandinavica. Supplementum.