Analytic gradients for density cumulant functional theory: the DCFT-06 model.

Density cumulant functional theory (DCFT) is one of a number of nascent electron correlation methods that are derived from reduced density matrices and cumulants thereof, instead of the wavefunction. Deriving properties from the density cumulant naturally yields methods that are size extensive and size consistent. In this work, we derive expressions for the analytic gradient, with respect to an external perturbation, for the DCFT-06 variant of density cumulant functional theory. Despite the fact that the DCFT-06 energy functional is stationary with respect to the density cumulant, the analytic gradients of the energy require the solution of perturbation-independent equations for both orbital and cumulant response. These two sets of linear response equations are coupled in nature and are solved iteratively with the solution of orbital and cumulant response equations each macroiteration, exhibiting rapid convergence. The gradients are implemented and benchmarked against coupled cluster theory with single and double excitations (CCSD) and CCSD with perturbative triple excitations [CCSD(T)], as well as accurate empirically corrected experimental data, for a test set comprising 15 small molecules. For most of the test cases, results from DCFT-06 are closer to CCSD(T) and empirical data than those from CCSD. Although the total energy and analytic gradient have the same asymptotic scaling, the present experience shows that the computational cost of the gradient is significantly lower.

[1]  A. DePrince,et al.  Parametric approach to variational two-electron reduced-density-matrix theory , 2007 .

[2]  Edward F. Valeev,et al.  A novel interpretation of reduced density matrix and cumulant for electronic structure theories. , 2011, The Journal of chemical physics.

[3]  Rodney J. Bartlett,et al.  Analytic energy derivatives in many‐body methods. I. First derivatives , 1989 .

[4]  Bernard R. Brooks,et al.  Analytic gradients from correlated wave functions via the two‐particle density matrix and the unitary group approach , 1980 .

[5]  H. Schaefer,et al.  In search of the next Holy Grail of polyoxide chemistry: explicitly correlated ab initio full quartic force fields for HOOH, HOOOH, HOOOOH, and their isotopologues. , 2012, The Journal of chemical physics.

[6]  Frank Neese,et al.  The coupled electron pair approximation: variational formulation and spin adaptation , 2010 .

[7]  Trygve Helgaker,et al.  Mo/ller–Plesset energy derivatives , 1988 .

[8]  R. Bartlett,et al.  Analytical gradient evaluation in coupled-cluster theory , 1985 .

[9]  Jeremiah J. Wilke,et al.  Density cumulant functional theory: first implementation and benchmark results for the DCFT-06 model. , 2010, The Journal of chemical physics.

[10]  David A. Mazziotti,et al.  Parametrization of the two-electron reduced density matrix for its direct calculation without the many-electron wave function: Generalizations and applications , 2010 .

[11]  G. Winnewisser,et al.  Torsional Dependence of the Effective Rotational Constants of H2O2 and H2S2 , 1993 .

[12]  J. Simons,et al.  Ab initio analytical molecular gradients and Hessians , 1983 .

[13]  Frank Neese,et al.  Accurate theoretical chemistry with coupled pair models. , 2009, Accounts of chemical research.

[14]  Garnet Kin-Lic Chan,et al.  Exact solution (within a triple-zeta, double polarization basis set) of the electronic Schrödinger equation for water , 2003 .

[15]  F. Neese,et al.  Efficient and accurate local approximations to coupled-electron pair approaches: An attempt to revive the pair natural orbital method. , 2009, The Journal of chemical physics.

[16]  Debashis Mukherjee,et al.  Irreducible Brillouin conditions and contracted Schrödinger equations for n-electron systems. I. The equations satisfied by the density cumulants , 2001 .

[17]  T. H. Dunning Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. I. The atoms boron through neon and hydrogen , 1989 .

[18]  Andrew G. Taube,et al.  Rethinking linearized coupled-cluster theory. , 2009, The Journal of chemical physics.

[19]  C. Kollmar A size extensive energy functional derived from a double configuration interaction approach: the role of N representability conditions. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[20]  M. Head‐Gordon,et al.  A fifth-order perturbation comparison of electron correlation theories , 1989 .

[21]  J. Stanton Why CCSD(T) works: a different perspective , 1997 .

[22]  J. S. Binkley,et al.  Derivative studies in hartree-fock and møller-plesset theories , 2009 .

[23]  F. Neese,et al.  An orbital-invariant and strictly size extensive post-Hartree-Fock correlation functional. , 2011, The Journal of chemical physics.

[24]  R. Bartlett,et al.  Coupled-cluster theory in quantum chemistry , 2007 .

[25]  Sandeep Sharma,et al.  The density matrix renormalization group in quantum chemistry. , 2011, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[26]  P. Szalay,et al.  Analytic energy derivatives for coupled‐cluster methods describing excited states: General formulas and comparison of computational costs , 1995 .

[27]  S. Polezzo Direct minimization of the energy functional in LCAO-MO density matrix formalism I. Closed and open shell systems , 1975 .

[28]  V. H. Smith,et al.  On Different Criteria for the Best Independent‐Particle Model Approximation , 1964 .

[29]  Matthew L. Leininger,et al.  Psi4: an open‐source ab initio electronic structure program , 2012 .

[30]  H. Schaefer,et al.  Generalization of analytic configuration interaction (CI) gradient techniques for potential energy hypersurfaces, including a solution to the coupled perturbed Hartree–Fock equations for multiconfiguration SCF molecular wave functions , 1982 .

[31]  W. Kutzelnigg,et al.  Irreducible Brillouin conditions and contracted Schrödinger equations for n-electron systems. IV. Perturbative analysis. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[32]  Werner Kutzelnigg,et al.  Density-cumulant functional theory. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[33]  Jürgen Gauss,et al.  State-of-the-art density matrix renormalization group and coupled cluster theory studies of the nitrogen binding curve. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[34]  David A Mazziotti,et al.  Parametrization of the two-electron reduced density matrix for its direct calculation without the many-electron wave function. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[35]  Mihály Kállay,et al.  The accuracy of molecular bond lengths computed by multireference electronic structure methods , 2008 .

[36]  Hans-Joachim Werner,et al.  A comparison of the efficiency and accuracy of the quadratic configuration interaction (QCISD), coupled cluster (CCSD), and Brueckner coupled cluster (BCCD) methods , 1992 .

[37]  Henry F. Schaefer,et al.  On the evaluation of analytic energy derivatives for correlated wave functions , 1984 .

[38]  Thom H. Dunning,et al.  Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. V. Core-valence basis sets for boron through neon , 1995 .

[39]  F. Neese,et al.  Efficient and accurate local single reference correlation methods for high-spin open-shell molecules using pair natural orbitals. , 2011, The Journal of chemical physics.

[40]  D. Mazziotti Contracted Schrödinger equation: Determining quantum energies and two-particle density matrices without wave functions , 1998 .

[41]  Jürgen Gauss,et al.  The prediction of molecular equilibrium structures by the standard electronic wave functions , 1997 .

[42]  Garnet Kin-Lic Chan,et al.  Canonical transformation theory from extended normal ordering. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[43]  Garnet Kin-Lic Chan,et al.  A review of canonical transformation theory , 2010 .

[44]  D. Mazziotti Two-electron reduced density matrix as the basic variable in many-electron quantum chemistry and physics. , 2012, Chemical reviews.

[45]  Debashis Mukherjee,et al.  Cumulant expansion of the reduced density matrices , 1999 .

[46]  Andrew G. Taube,et al.  Frozen natural orbital coupled-cluster theory: forces and application to decomposition of nitroethane. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.

[47]  F. Neese,et al.  A comparative study of single reference correlation methods of the coupled-pair type , 2008 .

[48]  Michael J. Frisch,et al.  Gradient theory applied to the Brueckner doubles method , 1991 .

[49]  Garnet Kin-Lic Chan,et al.  Density-matrix renormalization-group algorithms with nonorthogonal orbitals and non-Hermitian operators, and applications to polyenes. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[50]  R. Bartlett,et al.  Coupled‐cluster open‐shell analytic gradients: Implementation of the direct product decomposition approach in energy gradient calculations , 1991 .

[51]  Julia E. Rice,et al.  Analytic evaluation of energy gradients for the single and double excitation coupled cluster (CCSD) wave function: Theory and application , 1987 .

[52]  Garnet Kin-Lic Chan,et al.  Canonical transformation theory for multireference problems. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[53]  Trygve Helgaker,et al.  Analytical Calculation of Geometrical Derivatives in Molecular Electronic Structure Theory , 1988 .

[54]  John F. Stanton,et al.  The accurate determination of molecular equilibrium structures , 2001 .

[55]  Debashis Mukherjee,et al.  Normal order and extended Wick theorem for a multiconfiguration reference wave function , 1997 .