Automatic allograft bone selection through band registration and its application to distal femur

Clinical reports suggest that large bone defects could be effectively restored by allograft bone transplantation, where allograft bone selection acts an important role. Besides, there is a huge demand for developing the automatic allograft bone selection methods, as the automatic methods could greatly improve the management efficiency of the large bone banks. Although several automatic methods have been presented to select the most suitable allograft bone from the massive allograft bone bank, these methods still suffer from inaccuracy. In this paper, we propose an effective allograft bone selection method without using the contralateral bones. Firstly, the allograft bone is globally aligned to the recipient bone by surface registration. Then, the global alignment is further refined through band registration. The band, defined as the recipient points within the lifted and lowered cutting planes, could involve more local structure of the defected segment. Therefore, our method could achieve robust alignment and high registration accuracy of the allograft and recipient. Moreover, the existing contour method and surface method could be unified into one framework under our method by adjusting the lift and lower distances of the cutting planes. Finally, our method has been validated on the database of distal femurs. The experimental results indicate that our method outperforms the surface method and contour method.

[1]  D. Wolfe,et al.  Nonparametric Statistical Methods. , 1974 .

[2]  J. Royston An Extension of Shapiro and Wilk's W Test for Normality to Large Samples , 1982 .

[3]  D. Muscolo,et al.  Survivorship and Radiographic Analysis of Knee Osteoarticular Allografts , 2000, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  Zheng Guo,et al.  Three-dimensional virtual bone bank system for selecting massive bone allograft in orthopaedic oncology , 2015, International Orthopaedics.

[5]  Gérard G. Medioni,et al.  Object modelling by registration of multiple range images , 1992, Image Vis. Comput..

[6]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[7]  Antonio Gasparrini,et al.  Reducing and meta-analysing estimates from distributed lag non-linear models , 2013, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[8]  Z. Matějovský,et al.  Massive allografts in tumour surgery , 2006, International Orthopaedics.

[9]  T. Malinin,et al.  Allograft reconstruction for bone sarcoma of the tibia in the growing child. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[10]  D. Muscolo,et al.  Use of distal femoral osteoarticular allografts in limb salvage surgery. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  Lutz-Peter Nolte,et al.  Comparative Evaluation of Pelvic Allograft Selection Methods , 2013, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  Willi A. Kalender,et al.  An Integrated Segmentation and Analysis Approach for QCT of the Knee to Determine Subchondral Bone Mineral Density and Texture , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Qing Zhang,et al.  Allograft selection for distal femur through cutting contour registration , 2016, Cell and Tissue Banking.

[14]  Jean Dickinson Gibbons,et al.  Nonparametric Statistical Inference , 1972, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[15]  Olivier Cartiaux,et al.  Inaccuracy in selection of massive bone allograft using template comparison method , 2008, Cell and Tissue Banking.

[16]  J. Cañadell,et al.  Intercalary bone allografts. 23 tumor cases followed for 3 years. , 1994, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[17]  Fernán Gonzalez Bernaldo de Quirós,et al.  Three-Dimensional Morphometric Analysis of the Distal Femur: A Validity Method for Allograft Selection Using a Virtual Bone Bank , 2010, MedInfo.

[18]  Olivier Cartiaux,et al.  Improved Accuracy with 3D Planning and Patient-Specific Instruments During Simulated Pelvic Bone Tumor Surgery , 2013, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  Method for registration of 3-D shapes , 1992, Other Conferences.

[20]  I. Martin,et al.  Producing prefabricated tissues and organs via tissue engineering , 1997, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[21]  K. Gwet,et al.  A comparison of Cohen’s Kappa and Gwet’s AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples , 2013, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[22]  X. Banse,et al.  Selection of massive bone allografts using shape-matching 3-dimensional registration , 2010, Acta orthopaedica.

[23]  Otto S Hoekstra,et al.  Clinicians are right not to like Cohen’s κ , 2013, BMJ : British Medical Journal.