Application of even swaps for strategy selection in a rural enterprise

Selecting the best strategy from among a number of identified alternatives is an important part of any strategy process. Often this involves a difficult choice between the values to set and the trade‐offs to be made. Even swaps is a rational and simple method for making trade‐offs that help the decision maker in considering the value of one objective in terms of another. In this study, the principles of even swaps method are presented and its use is illustrated by applying it to a case of strategy selection in a rural enterprise in Finland. The strategy was chosen from among identified alternatives and it was evaluated with respect to the defined objectives and taking a number of possible future scenarios into account. According to the experiences gained from the case study, the decision makers found the trade‐offs difficult to make. However, they noted that the even swaps method made this difficult task more understandable by indicating the concrete changes in the objectives, allowing them to focus their mental energy on deciding the real value of the alternatives. As the swapping process is transparent, the method also supported communication and learning.

[1]  Joel M. Stern,et al.  THE EVA® FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM , 1995 .

[2]  J S Hammond,et al.  Even swaps: a rational method for making trade-offs. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[3]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[4]  Thomas L. Wheelen,et al.  Strategic Management and Business Policy , 1983 .

[5]  E. M. Babb,et al.  Rural Entrepreneurship: One Key to Rural Revitalization , 1989 .

[6]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Book Reviews : Scientific Opportunities and Public Needs: Improv ing Priority Setting and Public Input at the National Institutes of Health. Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1998, 136 pages, $26.00 , 1998 .

[7]  Rakesh K. Sarin,et al.  Measurable Multiattribute Value Functions , 1979, Oper. Res..

[8]  Y. Wind,et al.  An analytic hierarchy process based approach to the design and evaluation of a marketing driven business and corporate strategy , 1987 .

[9]  Ronald A. Howard,et al.  Decision analysis: practice and promise , 1988 .

[10]  Jyrki Kangas,et al.  Analysing uncertainties of interval judgment data in multiple-criteria evaluation of forest plans , 1998 .

[11]  Mari Pöyhönen,et al.  On Attribute Weighting in Value Trees , 1998 .

[12]  R. S. Laundy,et al.  Multiple Criteria Optimisation: Theory, Computation and Application , 1989 .

[13]  M. Kurttila,et al.  A simultaneous-equation model for predicting the production frontier of a forest holding , 1998 .

[14]  James L. Corner,et al.  Decision Analysis Applications in the Operations Research Literature, 1970-1989 , 1991, Oper. Res..

[15]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1980 .

[16]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[17]  Ralph E. Steuer Multiple criteria optimization , 1986 .

[18]  Miika Kajanus,et al.  A model for creating innovative strategies for an enterprise and its application to a rural enterprise , 2000 .

[19]  Annika Kangas,et al.  Outranking methods as tools in strategic natural resources planning , 2001 .