Evolution of Ultrafine Particle Size Distributions Following Indoor Episodic Releases: Relative Importance of Coagulation, Deposition and Ventilation

Indoor ultrafine particles (UFP, <100 nm) undergo aerosol processes such as coagulation and deposition, which alter UFP size distribution and accordingly the level of exposure to UFP of different sizes. This study investigates the decay of indoor UFP originated from five different sources: a gas stove and an electric stove, a candle, a hair dryer, and power tools in a residential test building. An indoor aerosol model was developed to investigate differential effects of coagulation, deposition, and ventilation. The coagulation model includes Brownian, van der Waals, and viscosity forces, and also fractal geometry for particles of >24 nm. The model was parameterized using different values of the Hamaker constant for predicting the coagulation rate. Deposition was determined for two different conditions: central fan on versus central fan off. For the case of a central fan running, deposition rates were measured by using a nonlinear solution to the mass balance equation for the whole building. For the central fan off case, an empirical model was used to estimate deposition rates. Ventilation was measured continuously using an automated tracer gas injection and sampling system. The study results show that coagulation is a significant aerosol process for UFP dynamics and the primary cause for the shift of particle size distribution following an episodic high-concentration UFP release with no fans operating. However, with the central mechanical fan on, UFP deposition loss is substantial and comparable to the coagulation loss. These results suggest that coagulation should be considered during high concentration periods (>20,000 cm−3), while particle deposition should be treated as a major loss mechanism when air recirculates through ductwork or mechanical systems. Copyright 2012 American Association for Aerosol Research

[1]  P J Catalano,et al.  Using time- and size-resolved particulate data to quantify indoor penetration and deposition behavior. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  C. Y. Shaw,et al.  Field measurements of boundary-layer flows in ventilated rooms , 1995 .

[3]  Lance Wallace,et al.  Indoor Sources of Ultrafine and Accumulation Mode Particles: Size Distributions, Size-Resolved Concentrations, and Source Strengths , 2006 .

[4]  Kai Zhang,et al.  Time allocation shifts and pollutant exposure due to traffic congestion: an analysis using the national human activity pattern survey. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[5]  M. L. Laucks,et al.  Aerosol Technology Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles , 2000 .

[6]  Lance Wallace,et al.  Continuous Monitoring of Ultrafine, Fine, and Coarse Particles in a Residence for 18 Months in 1999-2000 , 2002, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[7]  M. Kulmala,et al.  Deposition rates on smooth surfaces and coagulation of aerosol particles inside a test chamber , 2009 .

[8]  Tobias Schripp,et al.  Characterization of particle emission from household electrical appliances. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[9]  Mark Z. Jacobson,et al.  Fundamentals of atmospheric modeling , 1998 .

[10]  U. Matson,et al.  Indoor and outdoor concentrations of ultrafine particles in some Scandinavian rural and urban areas. , 2005, The Science of the total environment.

[11]  Vicki Stone,et al.  Toxicology of nanoparticles: A historical perspective , 2007 .

[12]  L. Keck,et al.  Emission of ultrafine copper particles by universal motors controlled by phase angle modulation , 2007 .

[13]  Andrew K. Persily,et al.  Infiltration of outdoor ultrafine particles into a test house. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  William W. Nazaroff,et al.  Mathematical Modeling of Indoor Aerosol Dynamics , 1989 .

[15]  Peter H. McMurry,et al.  Modal Aerosol Dynamics Modeling , 1997 .

[16]  A Seaton,et al.  Ultrafine particles and nitrogen oxides generated by gas and electric cooking , 2001, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[17]  Jakub Ondráček,et al.  Characterization of particulate matter concentrations during controlled indoor activities , 2010 .

[18]  Andrew K. Persily,et al.  Contribution of Gas and Electric Stoves to Residential Ultrafine Particle Concentrations between 2 and 64 nm: Size Distributions and Emission and Coagulation Rates , 2008 .

[19]  L. Morawska,et al.  Contribution from indoor sources to particle number and mass concentrations in residential houses , 2004 .

[20]  A. Schmidt-ott,et al.  New approaches to in situ characterization of ultrafine agglomerates , 1988 .

[21]  Tracy L. Thatcher,et al.  Effects of room furnishings and air speed on particle deposition rates indoors , 2002 .

[22]  A. Afshari,et al.  Characterization of indoor sources of fine and ultrafine particles: a study conducted in a full-scale chamber. , 2005, Indoor air.

[23]  W. Nazaroff Indoor particle dynamics. , 2004, Indoor air.

[24]  Tareq Hussein,et al.  Deposition of aerosol particles on rough surfaces inside a test chamber , 2009 .

[25]  S. Friedlander,et al.  Morphological properties of atmospheric aerosol aggregates , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  R. Dobbins Hydrocarbon Nanoparticles Formed in Flames and Diesel Engines , 2007 .

[27]  Lidia Morawska,et al.  Particle emission factors during cooking activities , 2009 .

[28]  Alvin C.K. Lai,et al.  Modeling Indoor Particle Deposition from Turbulent Flow onto Smooth Surfaces , 2000 .

[29]  Peter Wåhlin,et al.  Exposure to Ultrafine Particles from Ambient Air and Oxidative Stress–Induced DNA Damage , 2007, Environmental health perspectives.

[30]  Steven J. Emmerich,et al.  Effect of ventilation systems and air filters on decay rates of particles produced by indoor sources in an occupied townhouse , 2003 .

[31]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Evolution of nanoparticle size and mixing state near the point of emission , 2004 .

[32]  A. Peters,et al.  Daily mortality and particulate matter in different size classes in Erfurt, Germany , 2007, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[33]  Margaritis Kostoglou,et al.  Evolution of aggregate size and fractal dimension during Brownian coagulation , 2001 .

[34]  Cynthia Howard-Reed,et al.  Source strengths of ultrafine and fine particles due to cooking with a gas stove. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[35]  W. H. Engelmann,et al.  The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants , 2001, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.