Wertigkeit der kontrastmittelverstärkten Sonographie von Lymphknotenvergrößerungen im Kopf-Hals-Bereich versus Computertomographie undMagnetresonanztomographie

Ziel: Material und Methode: Ergebnisse: Schlussfolgerung: Purpose: Material and Methods: Results: Conclusion:

[1]  B. Misselwitz,et al.  Interstitial Magnetic Resonance Lymphography Using a Polymeric T1 Contrast Agent: Initial Experience With Gadomer-17 , 2002, Investigative radiology.

[2]  P. Tanis,et al.  Interstitial MR lymphangiography for the detection of sentinel lymph nodes , 2001, Journal of surgical oncology.

[3]  S. Ruehm,et al.  Interstitial MR lymphography with a conventional extracellular gadolinium-based agent: assessment in rabbits. , 2001, Radiology.

[4]  G. Ott,et al.  Pathological angioarchitecture in lymph nodes: underlying histopathologic findings. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[5]  J. Oestmann,et al.  Contrast-enhanced color Doppler sonography for evaluation of enlarged cervical lymph nodes in head and neck tumors. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  N. Hidajat,et al.  Vascularization of reactively enlarged lymph nodes analyzed by color duplex sonography. , 1999, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[7]  N. Hosten,et al.  Differential diagnosis of lymph node lesions. A semiquantitative approach with power Doppler sonography. , 1999, Investigative radiology.

[8]  R. Felix,et al.  Kapseldurchbrüche zervikaler Lymphknotenmetastasen: Diagnostischer Stellenwert der Computertomographie , 1999 .

[9]  Z H Adibelli,et al.  Differentiation of benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes: value of B-mode and color Doppler sonography. , 1998, European journal of radiology.

[10]  S. Weber,et al.  Assessment of vascularity in reactive lymph nodes by means of D-galactose contrast-enhanced Doppler sonography. , 1998, Investigative radiology.

[11]  R. Schröder,et al.  Signalverstärkte farbkodierte Duplexsonographie reaktiv und metastatisch vergrößerter Lymphknoten , 1998 .

[12]  D. Chang.  Differential Diagnosis of Cervical Lymphadenopathy: Usefulness of Color Doppler Sonography , 1997 .

[13]  Y. Ko,et al.  Differential diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy: usefulness of color Doppler sonography. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  R. Caiazzo,et al.  Evaluation of vascular patterns of cervical lymph nodes with power Doppler sonography , 1997, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[15]  R. Felix,et al.  Keratinization and necrosis. Morphologic aspects of lymphatic metastases in ultrasound. , 1996, Investigative radiology.

[16]  D. Merton,et al.  Color amplitude imaging: preliminary results using vascular sonographic contrast agents. , 1996, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[17]  M. Choi,et al.  Distinction between benign and malignant causes of cervical, axillary, and inguinal lymphadenopathy: value of Doppler spectral waveform analysis. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  H. J. Sieirzkamp,et al.  Farbkodierte Duplexsonographie in der Differentialdiagnostik zervikaler Lymphknotenvergrößerungen , 1994 .

[19]  R. Felix,et al.  Spiral-CT von zervikalen Lymphknotenvergrößerungen , 1994 .

[20]  A. Yuan,et al.  Differentiation of benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes with color Doppler sonography. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  C. Teske,et al.  Sonographie in der Tumornachsorge von Kopf-Hals-Tumorpatienten , 1994 .

[22]  P. Marcy,et al.  Very high frequency (13 MHz) ultrasonographic examination of the normal neck: detection of normal lymph nodes and thyroid nodules. , 1994, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[23]  W. Lieb,et al.  Farbduplexsonographische Messung der Lymphknotenperfusion: Ein Beitrag zur Diagnostik der zervikalen Metastasierung* , 1993 .

[24]  D. Yousem,et al.  Central nodal necrosis and extracapsular neoplastic spread in cervical lymph nodes: MR imaging versus CT. , 1992, Radiology.

[25]  C. Zwicker,et al.  Halslymphknotenmetastasen: Wertigkeit von Computertomographie und Palpation , 1991 .

[26]  J Valk,et al.  Cervical lymph node metastasis: assessment of radiologic criteria. , 1990, Radiology.

[27]  J. Valk,et al.  Detection and Characterization of Metastatic Cervical Adenopathy by MR Imaging: Comparison of Different MR Techniques , 1990, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[28]  R. Klier,et al.  Klinische Wertigkeit der Kontrastmittel-CT beim Lymphknotenstaging in der Halsregion , 1990 .

[29]  K. Eichler,et al.  Superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging of head and neck lymph nodes. , 2002, Radiology.

[30]  T. Lehmann,et al.  Color-coded duplex sonography of the cervical lymph nodes: improved differential diagnostic assessment after administration of the signal enhancer SH U 508A (Levovist)® , 2000, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[31]  A. Tschammler,et al.  Lymphadenopathy: differentiation of benign from malignant disease--color Doppler US assessment of intranodal angioarchitecture. , 1998, Radiology.

[32]  R. Felix,et al.  Spiral-CT von zervikalen Lymphknotenvergrösserungen: erste klinische Ergebnisse , 1994 .

[33]  C. Zwicker,et al.  Halslymphknotenmetastasen : Wertigkeit von Computertomographie und Palpation. Ein histologisch kontrollierter Vergleich , 1991 .