Digital Underlife in the Networked Writing Classroom

Abstract This article offers a theoretical framework for ‘digital underlife’: the distal and potentially transgressive discursive activities proliferated by emerging technologies. Digital underlife is an adaptation of sociologist Erving Goffman's concept of underlife, which figured centrally in Robert Brooke's well-known study of writing activity in 1988. As emerging digital technologies fray the communicative bounds of traditional sites for teaching and learning, such as the classroom and the conference hall, we are confronted anew with a complex array of possibilities for giving and getting attention. Drawing on the work of Charles Moran and Richard Lanham, this article calls for a more receptive disposition toward the productive dimensions of digital underlife. The article promotes a stance that imagines productive digital underlife to be intrinsic to curricula that combine digital writing activity and rhetorical education, rather than short-selling digital underlife as mere distraction, as an impediment to learning, or worse, attempting to banish it altogether.

[1]  Erving Goffman,et al.  Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates , 1961 .

[2]  Richard A. Lanham,et al.  Book Reviews: The Electronic Word: Democracy, Technology, and the Arts , 1995, CL.

[3]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Twelve Issues for Cognitive Science , 1980, Cogn. Sci..

[4]  Г. А. Бердников Оценка Финансовой Стоимости Бренда На Примере Компании Мтс , 2007 .

[5]  D. Cohen Chronicle of Higher Education , 1998 .

[6]  Michael J. Bugeja Facing the Facebook. , 2006 .

[7]  Janet Bacon Transitions: Teaching writing in computer-supported and traditional classrooms , 1998 .

[8]  Richard A. Lanham,et al.  The `Economics of Attention: Style and Substance in the Age of Information , 2006 .

[9]  И. Ж. Наргозиев Регулирование инфляции и инфляционных ожиданий: мировой опыт и практика Казахстана , 2007 .

[10]  Robert Brooke,et al.  Underlife and Writing Instruction , 1987 .

[11]  Charles Moran From a high-tech to a low-tech writing classroom: “You can't go home again” , 1998 .

[12]  Richard A. Lanham,et al.  The economics of attention , 2006 .

[13]  Marian G. Williams,et al.  Backchannel: whispering in digital conversation , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[14]  K. Yancey Made Not Only in Words: Composition in a New Key , 2004 .

[15]  Alison E Regan "Type Normal Like the Rest of Us": Writing, Power, and Homophobia in the Networked Composition Classroom. , 1993 .

[16]  William G. Griswold,et al.  Digital backchannels in shared physical spaces: attention, intention and contention , 2004, CSCW.

[17]  E. Goffman Stigma; Notes On The Management Of Spoiled Identity , 1964 .

[18]  F. Smith The Book of Learning and Forgetting , 1998 .

[19]  D. Norman Perspectives on cognitive science , 1981 .

[20]  Howard Rheingold,et al.  Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution , 2002 .

[21]  Thomas Masters Practicing Writing: The Postwar Discourse of Freshman English , 2004 .

[22]  Joseph Ugoretz "Two Roads Diverged in a Wood": Productive Digression in Asynchronous Discussion , 2005 .

[23]  Gregory L. Ulmer Internet Invention: From Literacy to Electracy , 2002 .

[24]  S. Phillips,et al.  You Can't Go Home Again , 2001 .