In-depth analysis and simulation study of an innovative fuzzy approach for ranking alternatives in multiple attribute decision making problems based on TOPSIS

In this paper, an innovative fuzzy approach for ranking alternatives in multiple attribute decision making problems based on TOPSIS is presented in-depth and studied through simulation comparison with the original method. The TOPSIS method provides the principle of compromise that the chosen alternative should have the shortest distance from the ideal solution and, simultaneously, the farthest distance from the negative ideal solution. However, the TOPSIS method does not always produce results in harmony with this principle due to an oversimplified definition of its aggregation function which does not grasp the contradictory nature of the principle's formulation. Our approach addresses this issue through the introduction of a fuzzy set representation of the closeness to the ideal and to the negative ideal solution for the definition of the aggregation function which is modeled as the membership function of the intersection of two fuzzy sets. This model enables a parameterization of the method according to the risk attitude of the decision maker. Thus, a class of methods is formulated whose different instances correspond to different risk attitudes of the decision makers. In order to define some clear advises for decision makers facilitating a proper parameterization of the method, a comparative analysis of the proposed class of methods with the original TOPSIS method is performed according to well defined simulation techniques. The results of the simulation experiment show on the one hand that there is no direct correspondence between the proposed class of methods and TOPSIS, and on the other hand that it is adequate to distinguish three instances that correspond respectively to risk-averse, risk-neutral and risk-seeking decision makers. Finally, a numerical example pertaining to the problem of service provider selection is presented to illustrate the application of the proposed class of methods and its functioning.

[1]  D.-F. Li,et al.  A fuzzy closeness approach to fuzzy multi-attribute decision making , 2007, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak..

[2]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[3]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[4]  Dong-Hyun Jee,et al.  A method for optimal material selection aided with decision making theory , 2000 .

[5]  Ching-Hsue Cheng,et al.  Fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS for supplier selection , 2009, Appl. Soft Comput..

[6]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Combining grey relation and TOPSIS concepts for selecting an expatriate host country , 2004, Math. Comput. Model..

[7]  Drakoulis Martakos,et al.  Customer evaluation for order acceptance using a novel class of fuzzy methods based on TOPSIS , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[8]  Rita Almeida Ribeiro Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: A review and new preference elicitation techniques , 1996, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[9]  Desheng Dash Wu,et al.  The method of grey related analysis to multiple attribute decision making problems with interval numbers , 2005, Math. Comput. Model..

[10]  Saeid Abbasbandy,et al.  Ranking of fuzzy numbers by sign distance , 2006, Inf. Sci..

[11]  Ch.-Ch Chou The canonical representation of multiplication operation on triangular fuzzy numbers , 2003 .

[12]  C. Spearman The proof and measurement of association between two things. , 2015, International journal of epidemiology.

[13]  R. Yager On a general class of fuzzy connectives , 1980 .

[14]  H. Zimmermann,et al.  Quantifying vagueness in decision models , 1985 .

[15]  Stelios H. Zanakis,et al.  Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  R. B. Lipton,et al.  The use of multiattribute decision models in evaluating triptan treatment options in migraine , 2005, Journal of Neurology.

[17]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications - A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[18]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Manufacturing plant location analysis by multiple attribute decision making: part I—single-plant strategy , 1985 .

[19]  Ludmil Mikhailov,et al.  Evaluation of services using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process , 2004, Appl. Soft Comput..

[20]  Deng Yong Plant location selection based on fuzzy TOPSIS , 2006 .

[21]  Tien-Chin Wang,et al.  Application of TOPSIS in evaluating initial training aircraft under a fuzzy environment , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[22]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  A two phase multi-attribute decision-making approach for new product introduction , 2007, Inf. Sci..

[23]  R. Yager Connectives and quantifiers in fuzzy sets , 1991 .

[24]  Hans Georg Gemünden,et al.  Number of alternatives and efficiency in different types of top-management decisions , 1985 .

[25]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  Richard Bellman,et al.  Decision-making in fuzzy environment , 2012 .

[27]  C. Hwang,et al.  TOPSIS for MODM , 1994 .

[28]  Dušan Teodorović Multicriteria ranking of air shuttle alternatives , 1985 .

[29]  C. B. Tilanus,et al.  Applied Economic Forecasting , 1966 .

[30]  Chen-Tung Chen,et al.  A fuzzy approach to select the location of the distribution center , 2001, Fuzzy Sets Syst..