Composite endpoints in COPD: clinically important deterioration in the UPLIFT trial
暂无分享,去创建一个
Meilan K. Han | F. Martinez | K. Rabe | D. Halpin | Dave Singh | M. Miravitlles | L. Grönke | F. Voß | M. Han
[1] F. Martinez,et al. Benefits of glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate metered dose inhaler (GFF MDI) in improving lung function and reducing exacerbations in patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD: a pooled analysis of the PINNACLE studies , 2020, Respiratory Research.
[2] A. D’Urzo,et al. Comparison of glycopyrronium versus tiotropium on the time to clinically important deteriorations in patients with COPD: a post-hoc analysis of randomized trials , 2018, npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine.
[3] T. Greulich,et al. Indacaterol/glycopyrronium reduces the risk of clinically important deterioration after direct switch from baseline therapies in patients with moderate COPD: a post hoc analysis of the CRYSTAL study , 2018, International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
[4] Dave Singh,et al. Reduction in clinically important deterioration in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with aclidinium/formoterol , 2017, Respiratory Research.
[5] A. Anzueto,et al. The effect of indacaterol/glycopyrronium versus tiotropium or salmeterol/fluticasone on the prevention of clinically important deterioration in COPD , 2017, International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
[6] Dave Singh,et al. Prevention of clinically important deteriorations in COPD with umeclidinium/vilanterol , 2016, International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
[7] M. Decramer,et al. Defining a COPD composite safety endpoint for demonstrating efficacy in clinical trials: results from the randomized, placebo-controlled UPLIFT® trial , 2016, Respiratory Research.
[8] M. Decramer,et al. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases : Journal of the COPD Foundation Effects of Tiotropium on Exacerbations in Patients with COPD with Low or High Risk of Exacerbations : A Post-Hoc Analysis from the 4-Year UPLIFT ® Trial , 2015 .
[9] P. Jones. Estimation and application of the minimum clinically important difference in COPD. , 2014, The Lancet. Respiratory medicine.
[10] F. Martinez,et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: GOLD executive summary. , 2007, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.
[11] C. Tantucci,et al. Lung function decline in COPD , 2012, International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
[12] Marie Westwood,et al. Relationship between FEV1 change and patient-reported outcomes in randomised trials of inhaled bronchodilators for stable COPD: a systematic review , 2011, Respiratory research.
[13] D. Halpin,et al. Defining Disease Modification in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease , 2009, COPD.
[14] M. Decramer,et al. A 4-year trial of tiotropium in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.
[15] M. Pistolesi,et al. Outcomes for COPD pharmacological trials: from lung function to biomarkers , 2008, European Respiratory Journal.
[16] J. Donohue. Minimal Clinically Important Differences in COPD Lung Function , 2005, COPD.
[17] M. Decramer,et al. Clinical Trial Design Considerations in Assessing Long‐Term Functional Impacts of Tiotropium in COPD: The Uplift Trial , 2004, COPD.
[18] Nick Freemantle,et al. Composite outcomes in randomized trials: greater precision but with greater uncertainty? , 2003, JAMA.
[19] Hilde van der Togt,et al. Publisher's Note , 2003, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..