A continuous sampling pattern design algorithm for atomic force microscopy images.

Undersampling is an efficient way to increase the imaging rate of atomic force microscopy (AFM). One major challenge in this approach is retaining the quality of the final images while reducing the amount of measurements enough to have a significant improvement in the imaging time. Clearly, the decision of where to acquire data points plays an important role in producing accurate image reconstructions of the sample surface with the best allocation of measurements depending on the specific sample under study. This work focuses on the development of an algorithm to design continuous non-raster scanning patterns for effective undersampled image acquisition in AFM. We assume the frequency structure of the images to be sampled, and in particular the locations of the large frequency coefficients, is partially known. Based on this knowledge, a two-stage algorithm is used to find a continuous scan pattern that minimizes the expected reconstruction error assuming reconstruction is performed using an algorithm known as Simplified Matching Pursuit (SMP). In the first stage, a collection of short, disconnected scan paths is designed to minimize the reconstruction error while in the second, these paths are connected into a continuous trajectory by solving a mixed integer linear program (MILP) that minimizes the total scan length. To demonstrate the performance of the proposed method, we design scanning patterns for four groups of sample surface images from four different materials acquired by AFM. In each case a large sample area is tiled into sixteen sub-images. The first image is raster scanned and the results used to design an optimized scan pattern that is then applied to the remaining 15 tiles. The designed patterns sampled 10-15% of the total pixels (depending on the particular sample) leading to an imaging time that was 15-20% of the time to acquire a full raster of the same area. These results were compared to sub-sampling using spiral and Lissajous scan patterns designed to have an equivalent scanning time and to sample a similar percentage of the pixels. The results show that our approach yields significantly better reconstruction quality than either of these alternative scan patterns. Finally, the method was implemented and used to image a calibration grating by sampling 18% of the total pixels, using four different tip speeds. The results were compared to full raster-scans of the sample with tip speeds selected so as to match the imaging time of the non-raster scans, showing that the proposed method produces higher-quality images than raster scanning at these fast image rates.

[1]  Murti V. Salapaka,et al.  Harnessing the transient signals in atomic force microscopy , 2005 .

[2]  Theodore Antonakopoulos,et al.  Nanopositioning using the spiral of Archimedes: The probe-based storage case , 2010 .

[3]  Sean B. Andersson,et al.  A compressed sensing measurement matrix for atomic force microscopy , 2014, 2014 American Control Conference.

[4]  Sean B. Andersson,et al.  Feature tracking for high speed AFM: Experimental demonstration , 2017, 2017 American Control Conference (ACC).

[5]  S. Andersson,et al.  A comparison of reconstruction methods for undersampled atomic force microscopy images , 2015, Nanotechnology.

[6]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Learning to Sense Sparse Signals: Simultaneous Sensing Matrix and Sparsifying Dictionary Optimization , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[7]  Karl Johan Åström,et al.  Design and Modeling of a High-Speed AFM-Scanner , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[8]  Lucy Y. Pao,et al.  Non-raster sampling in atomic force microscopy: A compressed sensing approach , 2012, 2012 American Control Conference (ACC).

[9]  Yiming Pi,et al.  Optimized Projection Matrix for Compressive Sensing , 2010, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[10]  Li-Min Zhu,et al.  High-bandwidth tracking control of piezo-actuated nanopositioning stages using closed-loop input shaper , 2014 .

[11]  Peng Huang,et al.  High speed atomic force microscopy enabled by a sample profile estimator. , 2013, Applied physics letters.

[12]  Wei Lu,et al.  Modified-CS: Modifying compressive sensing for problems with partially known support , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[13]  I. A. Mahmood,et al.  Fast spiral-scan atomic force microscopy , 2009, Nanotechnology.

[14]  Saeid Sanei,et al.  On optimization of the measurement matrix for compressive sensing , 2010, 2010 18th European Signal Processing Conference.

[15]  Kenneth Steiglitz,et al.  Combinatorial Optimization: Algorithms and Complexity , 1981 .

[16]  Deanna Needell,et al.  CoSaMP: Iterative signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate samples , 2008, ArXiv.

[17]  Ian R. Petersen,et al.  Model predictive control of atomic force microscope for fast image scanning , 2012, 2012 IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[18]  Murti V. Salapaka,et al.  High bandwidth nano-positioner: A robust control approach , 2002 .

[19]  Cristiano Jacques Miosso,et al.  Compressive Sensing Reconstruction With Prior Information by Iteratively Reweighted Least-Squares , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[20]  Sean B. Andersson,et al.  A fast image reconstruction algorithm for compressed sensing-based atomic force microscopy , 2015, 2015 American Control Conference (ACC).

[21]  S. O. Reza Moheimani,et al.  A High-Bandwidth MEMS Nanopositioner for On-Chip AFM: Design, Characterization, and Control , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[22]  Joel A. Tropp,et al.  Signal Recovery From Random Measurements Via Orthogonal Matching Pursuit , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[23]  Lucy Y. Pao,et al.  Hardware Demonstration of Atomic Force Microscopy Imaging Via Compressive Sensing and $\mu$-Path Scans , 2018, 2018 Annual American Control Conference (ACC).

[24]  Pascal Getreuer,et al.  Enhancement and Recovery in Atomic Force Microscopy Images , 2012 .

[25]  Gitta Kutyniok,et al.  1 . 2 Sparsity : A Reasonable Assumption ? , 2012 .

[26]  M. S. Rana,et al.  Spiral Scanning With Improved Control for Faster Imaging of AFM , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology.

[27]  Deanna Needell,et al.  Constrained Adaptive Sensing , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[28]  S O R Moheimani,et al.  Invited review article: high-speed flexure-guided nanopositioning: mechanical design and control issues. , 2012, The Review of scientific instruments.

[29]  Lawrence Carin,et al.  Exploiting Structure in Wavelet-Based Bayesian Compressive Sensing , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[30]  Jie Tang,et al.  Prior image constrained compressed sensing (PICCS): a method to accurately reconstruct dynamic CT images from highly undersampled projection data sets. , 2008, Medical physics.

[31]  Pierre Weiss,et al.  Variable Density Sampling with Continuous Trajectories , 2014, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[32]  Michael Elad,et al.  Optimized Projections for Compressed Sensing , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[33]  Guido Herrmann,et al.  An adaptive non-raster scanning method in Atomic Force Microscopy for simple sample shapes , 2015 .

[34]  Peng Huang,et al.  Note: Fast imaging of DNA in atomic force microscopy enabled by a local raster scan algorithm. , 2014, The Review of scientific instruments.

[35]  N. Xi,et al.  Video rate Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) imaging using compressive sensing , 2011, 2011 11th IEEE International Conference on Nanotechnology.

[36]  S. O. Reza Moheimani,et al.  A Kalman Filter for Amplitude Estimation in High-Speed Dynamic Mode Atomic Force Microscopy , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[37]  Andrew J Fleming,et al.  Compact ultra-fast vertical nanopositioner for improving scanning probe microscope scan speed. , 2011, The Review of scientific instruments.