Programming Research Group CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM STRUCTURES

Dagger-compact categories have been proposed as a categorical framework suitable for quantum reasoning [1, LiCS’04]. Modelling classical operations in this framework seemed to require additional completeness assumptions, most notably biproducts. In the present paper, we show that classical operations naturally arise from the quantum structures, with no additional assumptions. Formally, the distinct capabilities of classical data – that they can be copied and deleted – are captured by means of special coalgebra structures of classical objects. Conceptually, this suggests that the connection of the classical and the quantum reasoning extends the connection of the classical and the resource sensitive logics. Technically, the connection of the classical and the quantum structures thus echoes the connection of the additive and the multiplicative connectives in Linear Logic. In this familiar conceptual framework, we propose a comprehensive formulation of axioms of quantum informatics, which essentially improves on previous work. The underlying graphic calculus allows a very succinct presentation of several quantum informatic protocols. The underlying structural analysis also provides the elements of an abstract stochastic calculus, and points towards possible refinements of resource sensitive logics, which arise from the quantitative content of quantum mechanics and the limited observability of quantum data.

[1]  W. Wootters,et al.  A single quantum cannot be cloned , 1982, Nature.

[2]  S. Braunstein,et al.  Impossibility of deleting an unknown quantum state , 2000, Nature.

[3]  Peter Gabriel,et al.  Calculus of Fractions and Homotopy Theory , 1967 .

[4]  Bob Coecke,et al.  De-linearizing Linearity: Projective Quantum Axiomatics From Strong Compact Closure , 2005, QPL.

[5]  V. Turaev Quantum Invariants of Knots and 3-Manifolds , 1994, hep-th/9409028.

[6]  G. M. Kelly,et al.  Coherence for compact closed categories , 1980 .

[7]  V. Paulsen Completely Bounded Maps and Operator Algebras: Contents , 2003 .

[8]  A. Carboni,et al.  Cartesian bicategories I , 1987 .

[9]  David N. Yetter,et al.  Braided Compact Closed Categories with Applications to Low Dimensional Topology , 1989 .

[10]  Peter Selinger,et al.  Dagger Compact Closed Categories and Completely Positive Maps: (Extended Abstract) , 2007, QPL.

[11]  O. Cohen CLASSICAL TELEPORTATION OF CLASSICAL STATES , 2003, quant-ph/0310017.

[12]  Dusko Pavlovic,et al.  Quantum measurements without sums , 2007 .

[13]  Aram Harrow Coherent communication of classical messages. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[14]  G. Brassard,et al.  TelePOVM - A generalized quantum teleportation scheme , 2004, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[15]  Joachim Kock,et al.  Frobenius Algebras and 2-D Topological Quantum Field Theories , 2004 .

[16]  Patrick Lincoln,et al.  Linear logic , 1992, SIGA.

[17]  Samson Abramsky,et al.  Abstract Physical Traces , 2009, ArXiv.

[18]  A. Joyal,et al.  The geometry of tensor calculus, I , 1991 .

[19]  Prakash Panangaden,et al.  Fock Space: A Model of Linear Exponential Types , 1994 .

[20]  Du Sko Pavlovi,et al.  Categorical Logic of Names and Abstraction in Action Calculi , 1993 .

[21]  Thomas A. O. Fox Coalgebras and cartesian categories , 1976 .

[22]  Samson Abramsky,et al.  A categorical semantics of quantum protocols , 2004, Proceedings of the 19th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, 2004..

[23]  R. Jozsa,et al.  A Complete Classification of Quantum Ensembles Having a Given Density Matrix , 1993 .

[24]  R. Werner All teleportation and dense coding schemes , 2000, quant-ph/0003070.