Both food habit change in the past and obesity status may influence the association between dietary factors and postmenopausal breast cancer

Abstract Objective Valid dietary data are essential when trying to identify whether or not one or more dietary exposures are responsible for disease. We examined diet composition in women who reported dietary change in the past compared with non-changers, and how the associations between dietary factors and postmenopausal breast cancer are influenced by dietary change, obesity status and misreporting of energy. Design A population-based prospective cohort study. Data were obtained by a diet history method, anthropometrical measurements and an extensive lifestyle questionnaire including items on past food habit change. Setting The Malmö Diet and Cancer (MDC) study, conducted in Malmö, Sweden. Subjects A subsample of 12 781 women from the MDC cohort recruited from 1991 to 1996. A total of 428 postmenopausal women were diagnosed with incident breast cancer, during 9.2 years of follow-up. Results Past food habit changers reported healthier food habits and lower energy intake compared with non-changers, a finding that raises issues regarding possible reporting biases. When excluding diet changers, the trend of increased breast cancer risk across omega-6 fatty acid quintiles was stronger, and a tendency of decreased risk emerged for ‘fruit, berries and vegetables’. When excluding individuals with non-adequate reports of energy intake, risk estimates were similar to that of the whole sample. In women with body mass index < 27 kg m− 2, significant trends of increased breast cancer risk were seen for total fat and omega-6 fatty acids, and of decreased risk for ‘fruit, berries and vegetables’. Conclusions This study indicates that both obesity and self-reported past food habit change may be important confounders of diet–breast cancer relationships. The study demonstrates that sensitivity analysis, through stratification, may facilitate interpretation of risk relationships and study results.

[1]  G. Berglund,et al.  Misreporting of energy: prevalence, characteristics of misreporters and influence on observed risk estimates in the Malmö Diet and Cancer cohort , 2005, British Journal of Nutrition.

[2]  G. Berglund,et al.  Past food habit change is related to obesity, lifestyle and socio-economic factors in the Malmo Diet and Cancer Cohort , 2005, Public Health Nutrition.

[3]  G. Berglund,et al.  High fat and alcohol intakes are risk factors of postmenopausal breast cancer: A prospective study from the Malmö diet and cancer cohort , 2004, International journal of cancer.

[4]  M. McDowell,et al.  Personality characteristics as predictors of underreporting of energy intake on 24-hour dietary recall interviews. , 2003, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[5]  G. Johansson,et al.  Associations between diet and the metabolic syndrome vary with the validity of dietary intake data. , 2003, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[6]  G. Berglund,et al.  A prospective study of adiposity and postmenopausal breast cancer risk: The Malmö diet and cancer study , 2003, International journal of cancer.

[7]  G. Berglund,et al.  Postmenopausal breast cancer is associated with high intakes of ω6 fatty acids (Sweden) , 2002, Cancer Causes and Control.

[8]  L. Lissner Measuring food intake in studies of obesity , 2002, Public Health Nutrition.

[9]  Charles E Matthews,et al.  Systematic errors in middle-aged women's estimates of energy intake: comparing three self-report measures to total energy expenditure from doubly labeled water. , 2002, Annals of epidemiology.

[10]  G. Berglund,et al.  A prospective study of adiposity and all-cause mortality: the Malmö Diet and Cancer Study. , 2002, Obesity research.

[11]  M. Latteri,et al.  Metabolic syndrome and breast cancer risk. , 2002, European review for medical and pharmacological sciences.

[12]  G. Berglund,et al.  The Malmö diet and cancer study: representativity, cancer incidence and mortality in participants and non‐participants , 2001, European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation.

[13]  R. Hill,et al.  The validity of self-reported energy intake as determined using the doubly labelled water technique , 2001, British Journal of Nutrition.

[14]  W. Willett,et al.  Weight change and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer (United States) , 2000, Cancer Causes & Control.

[15]  G. Berglund,et al.  Food patterns defined by cluster analysis and their utility as dietary exposure variables: a report from the Malmö Diet and Cancer Study , 2000, Public Health Nutrition.

[16]  J. Ockene,et al.  A dietitian-delivered group nutrition program leads to reductions in dietary fat, serum cholesterol, and body weight: the Worcester Area Trial for Counseling in Hyperlipidemia (WATCH). , 1999, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[17]  J. Blundell,et al.  The sugar–fat relationship revisited: differences in consumption between men and women of varying BMI , 1998, International Journal of Obesity.

[18]  J. Ockene,et al.  Gender differences in social desirability and social approval bias in dietary self-report. , 1997, American journal of epidemiology.

[19]  D. Neumark-Sztainer,et al.  Self-reported dieting: how should we ask? What does it mean? Associations between dieting and reported energy intake. , 1997, The International journal of eating disorders.

[20]  A. Brooker,et al.  Interpreting epidemiologic studies of diet-disease relationships. , 1997, The Journal of nutrition.

[21]  B. Margetts,et al.  1. Overview of the principles of nutritional epidemiology , 1997 .

[22]  M. L. Nelson,et al.  Design concepts in nutritional epidemiology , 1997 .

[23]  W C Willett,et al.  Adjustment for total energy intake in epidemiologic studies. , 1997, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[24]  M. Dowsett,et al.  Re: Reversal of relation between body mass and endogenous estrogen concentrations with menopausal status. , 1996, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[25]  E. Riboli,et al.  The Malmö Food Study: the relative validity of a modified diet history method and an extensive food frequency questionnaire for measuring food intake. , 1996, European journal of clinical nutrition.

[26]  A. Schatzkin,et al.  Contribution of dieting to the inverse association between energy intake and body mass index. , 1996, European journal of clinical nutrition.

[27]  A. Black,et al.  The validation of energy and protein intakes by doubly labelled water and 24-hour urinary nitrogen excretion in post-obese subjects , 1995 .

[28]  D Clayton,et al.  Measurement error in dietary assessment: an investigation using covariance structure models. Part I. , 1993, Statistics in medicine.

[29]  G. Berglund,et al.  Design and feasibility , 1993 .

[30]  K. Flegal,et al.  Differential misclassification arising from nondifferential errors in exposure measurement. , 1991, American journal of epidemiology.

[31]  S. Wiseman Alcohol: Our Favourite Drug: New Report on Alcohol and Alcohol-related Problems from a Special Committee of the Royal College of Psychiatrists , 1987 .

[32]  C Brownie,et al.  The effects of exposure misclassification on estimates of relative risk. , 1986, American journal of epidemiology.

[33]  R. Hoover,et al.  Reversal of relation between body mass and endogenous estrogen concentrations with menopausal status. , 1996, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[34]  D. Clayton,et al.  Measurement error in dietary assessment: an investigation using covariance structure models. Part II. , 1993, Statistics in medicine.

[35]  G. Berglund,et al.  The Malmo Diet and Cancer Study. Design and feasibility. , 1993, Journal of internal medicine.

[36]  M. Singer,et al.  Nutritional Epidemiology , 2020, Definitions.