Life Cycle Assessment Framework To Support the Design of Biobased Rigid Polyurethane Foams

A methodological framework implementing laboratory activities and life cycle assessment is presented and applied to determine which parameters should be considered to develop biobased rigid polyurethane foams for thermal insulation with improved environmental performances when compared to their fossil counterparts. The framework was applied to six partially biobased (produced from bio-based polyols obtained from azelaic acid and/or lignin) and one fossil-based formulations. A comprehensive set of impact assessment categories was investigated including uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Results proved that physical characteristics such as thermal conductivity and density are the most important variable to be optimized to guarantee better environmental performances of biobased polyurethane rigid foams for thermal insulation. Care should be taken with reference to ozone depletion potential, marine eutrophication, and abiotic depletion potential because of the uncertainty related to their results. The methylene diphenyl diisocyanate and foam production process were identified as the major sources of impacts. Overall environmental superiority of biobased polyurethanes cannot always be claimed with respect to their fossil counterpart.

[1]  Timothy M. Smith,et al.  Comparative life cycle assessment of fossil and bio-based polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles , 2016 .

[2]  A. Inaba,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions of 100% bio-derived polyethylene terephthalate on its life cycle compared with petroleum-derived polyethylene terephthalate , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[3]  Gregor Wernet,et al.  The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[4]  U. Cabulis,et al.  Effect of bio-polyols with different chemical structures on foaming of polyurethane systems and foam properties , 2018, Industrial Crops and Products.

[5]  Richard K. Helling,et al.  Use of life cycle assessment to characterize the environmental impacts of polyol production options , 2009 .

[6]  V. Pasa,et al.  Production and characterization of polyurethane foams from a simple mixture of castor oil, crude glycerol and untreated lignin as bio-based polyols , 2016 .

[7]  J. Labidi,et al.  Lignin liquefaction under microwave heating , 2013 .

[8]  Jean-Paul Hettelingh,et al.  Country-dependent Characterisation Factors for Acidification and Terrestrial Eutrophication Based on Accumulated Exceedance as an Impact Category Indicator (14 pp) , 2006 .

[9]  Hasan Jameel,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of lignin extraction in a softwood kraft pulp mill , 2016 .

[10]  G. Psacharopoulos.  Overview and methodology , 1991 .

[11]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  European characterization factors for human health damage of PM10 and ozone in life cycle impact assessment , 2008 .

[12]  K. Zia,et al.  Bio-based polyurethane: An efficient and environment friendly coating systems: A review , 2016 .

[13]  Joyce Smith Cooper,et al.  Parameterization in Life Cycle Assessment inventory data: review of current use and the representation of uncertainty , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[14]  Jeroen B. Guinee,et al.  Handbook on life cycle assessment operational guide to the ISO standards , 2002 .

[15]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Sensitivity analysis in life cycle assessment , 2014 .

[16]  M. R. Kessler,et al.  Bio-based Polyurethane Foam Made from Compatible Blends of Vegetable-Oil-based Polyol and Petroleum-based Polyol , 2015 .

[17]  Rafael Horn,et al.  LCA and Eco-design: Consequential and Attributional Approaches for Bio-based Plastics , 2018 .

[18]  L. Glicksman.  Heat transfer in foams , 1994 .

[19]  Akihiko Kondo,et al.  Microbial conversion of biomass into bio-based polymers. , 2017, Bioresource technology.

[20]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Bio-based plastics - A review of environmental, social and economic impact assessments , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[21]  Qiangxian Wu,et al.  Development of high-performance biodegradable rigid polyurethane foams using all bioresource-based polyols: Lignin and soy oil-derived polyols. , 2018, International journal of biological macromolecules.

[22]  Sujata K. Bhatia,et al.  Biobased plastics and bionanocomposites: Current status and future opportunities , 2013 .

[23]  Jeongwoo Han,et al.  Life-cycle fossil energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions of bioderived chemicals and their conventional counterparts. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  ThE CirCUlAr,et al.  EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy , 2016 .

[25]  J. Wen,et al.  Producing Lignin-Based Polyols through Microwave-Assisted Liquefaction for Rigid Polyurethane Foam Production , 2015, Materials.

[26]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  Life cycle impact assessment of bio-based plastics from sugarcane ethanol , 2015 .