Chapter 1: Introduction to the Methods Guide for Medical Test Reviews

Evaluation of medical tests presents challenges distinct from those involved in the evaluation of therapies; in particular, the very great importance of context and the dearth of comprehensive RCTs aimed at comparing the clinical outcomes of different tests and test strategies. Available guidance provides some suggestions: 1) Use of the PICOTS typology for clarifying the context relevant to the review, and 2) use of an organizing framework for classifying the types of medical test evaluation studies and their relationship to potential key questions. However, there is a diversity of recommendations for reviewers of medical tests and a proliferation of concepts, terms, and methods. As a contribution to the field, this Methods Guide for Medical Test Reviews seeks to provide practical guidance for achieving the goals of clarity, consistency, tractability, and usefulness.

[1]  C. T. Orleans,et al.  Evaluating primary care behavioral counseling interventions: an evidence-based approach. , 2002, American journal of preventive medicine.

[2]  R. Ledley,et al.  Reasoning foundations of medical diagnosis. , 1991, M.D. computing : computers in medical practice.

[3]  Patrick M M Bossuyt,et al.  Using the Principles of Randomized Controlled Trial Design to Guide Test Evaluation , 2009, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[4]  D. Matchar,et al.  Methods Guide for Medical Test Reviews , 2012 .

[5]  R S LEDLEY,et al.  Reasoning foundations of medical diagnosis; symbolic logic, probability, and value theory aid our understanding of how physicians reason. , 1959, Science.

[6]  David J Samson,et al.  Challenges in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Technologies , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[7]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  Randomised comparisons of medical tests: sometimes invalid, not always efficient , 2000, The Lancet.

[8]  Sarah Lord,et al.  When Is Measuring Sensitivity and Specificity Sufficient To Evaluate a Diagnostic Test, and When Do We Need Randomized Trials? , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[9]  Denise O'Connor,et al.  Chapter 5: Defining the review question and developing criteria for including studies , 2008 .

[10]  Peter Langhorne,et al.  Integrating Heterogeneous Pieces of Evidence in Systematic Reviews , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[11]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[12]  Jeroen G Lijmer,et al.  Proposals for a Phased Evaluation of Medical Tests , 2009, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[13]  S. Fletcher,et al.  Making recommendations on preventive practices: methodological issues. , 1988, American journal of preventive medicine.

[14]  Ralf Schulze,et al.  The efficacy of diagnostic imaging. , 2012, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[15]  J. Yerushalmy.  Statistical problems in assessing methods of medical diagnosis, with special reference to X-ray techniques. , 1947, Public health reports.

[16]  Uwe Siebert,et al.  When should decision-analytic modeling be used in the economic evaluation of health care? , 2003, The European Journal of Health Economics, formerly: HEPAC.

[17]  C. Mulrow,et al.  Current methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: a review of the process. , 2001, American journal of preventive medicine.

[18]  W. Baine,et al.  The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality , 2006, Italian Journal of Public Health.

[19]  L. Hedges,et al.  A Brief History of Research Synthesis , 2002, Evaluation & the health professions.

[20]  Douglas K Owens,et al.  Challenges in Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Topics Related to the Delivery, Organization, and Financing of Health Care , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.