4D flow imaging of the thoracic aorta: is there an added clinical value?

Four-dimensional (4D) flow MRI has emerged as a powerful non-invasive technique in cardiovascular imaging, enabling to analyse in vivo complex flow dynamics models by quantifying flow parameters and derived features. Deep knowledge of aortic flow dynamics is fundamental to better understand how abnormal flow patterns may promote or worsen vascular diseases. In the perspective of an increasingly personalized and preventive medicine, growing interest is focused on identifying those quantitative functional features which are early predictive markers of pathological evolution. The thoracic aorta and its spectrum of diseases, as the first area of application and development of 4D flow MRI and supported by an extensive experimental validation, represents the ideal model to introduce this technique into daily clinical practice. The purpose of this review is to describe the impact of 4D flow MRI in the assessment of the thoracic aorta and its most common affecting diseases, providing an overview of the actual clinical applications and describing the potential role of derived advanced hemodynamic measures in tailoring follow-up and treatment.

[1]  Stephane Avril,et al.  Relationship Between Ascending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms Hemodynamics and Biomechanical Properties , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  M. Markl,et al.  4D Flow with MRI. , 2020, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[3]  M. Recio,et al.  Clinical use of 4D flow MRI for quantification of aortic regurgitation , 2020, Open Heart.

[4]  J. Takkenberg,et al.  Decision Making in Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Surgery - Clinician & Patient View. , 2019, Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[5]  David García-Dorado,et al.  Increased rotational flow in the proximal aortic arch is associated with its dilation in bicuspid aortic valve disease. , 2019, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[6]  M. Markl,et al.  Parametric Hemodynamic 4D Flow MRI Maps for the Characterization of Chronic Thoracic Descending Aortic Dissection , 2019, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[7]  J. Barkhausen,et al.  In vitro 4D Flow MRI evaluation of aortic valve replacements reveals disturbed flow distal to biological but not to mechanical valves , 2019, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[8]  E. Girdauskas,et al.  Aortic valve-related aortopathy: assessing optimal timing of surgical intervention , 2019, Expert review of cardiovascular therapy.

[9]  Hildo J. Lamb,et al.  Predictive imaging for thoracic aortic dissection and rupture: moving beyond diameters , 2019, European Radiology.

[10]  H. Crijns,et al.  Clinical assessment of aortic valve stenosis: Comparison between 4D flow MRI and transthoracic echocardiography , 2019, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  Christoph Forman,et al.  Aortic 4D flow MRI in 2 minutes using compressed sensing, respiratory controlled adaptive k‐space reordering, and inline reconstruction , 2019, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  V. Marteau,et al.  Four-dimensional Flow MRI: Principles and Cardiovascular Applications. , 2019, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[13]  M. Markl,et al.  The Role of Imaging of Flow Patterns by 4D Flow MRI in Aortic Stenosis. , 2019, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[14]  C. Catalano,et al.  Aortic flow after valve sparing root replacement with or without neosinuses reconstruction , 2019, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[15]  C. A. Figueroa,et al.  Haemodynamic assessment of bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy: a systematic review of the current literature , 2018, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[16]  C. Catalano,et al.  Aortic valvular imaging with cardiovascular magnetic resonance: seeking for comprehensiveness. , 2019, The British journal of radiology.

[17]  P. Croisille,et al.  Evaluation of Peak Wall Stress in an Ascending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Using FSI Simulations: Effects of Aortic Stiffness and Peripheral Resistance , 2018, Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology.

[18]  I. Carbone,et al.  4D flow characterization of aortic blood flow after valve sparing root reimplantation procedure. , 2018, Journal of visualized surgery.

[19]  Ernst J Rummeny,et al.  4D-Flow MRI: Technique and Applications 4D-MR-Flussmessung: Technik und Anwendungen , 2018, RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren.

[20]  E. S. Farag,et al.  Advanced cardiac MRI techniques for evaluation of left‐sided valvular heart disease , 2018, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[21]  Jürgen Hennig,et al.  Determination of aortic stiffness using 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance - a population-based study , 2018, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[22]  C. Catalano,et al.  Novel insights by 4D Flow imaging on aortic flow physiology after valve-sparing root replacement with or without neosinuses. , 2018, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[23]  Kevin M. Johnson,et al.  Aortic flow patterns and wall shear stress maps by 4D-flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the assessment of aortic dilatation in bicuspid aortic valve disease , 2018, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[24]  K. Eagle,et al.  Insights From the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection: A 20-Year Experience of Collaborative Clinical Research , 2018, Circulation.

[25]  Sebastian Schmitter,et al.  4D Flow MRI , 2018 .

[26]  W. Strugnell,et al.  MRI measurements of the thoracic aorta and pulmonary artery , 2018, Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology.

[27]  Michael Markl,et al.  k‐t accelerated aortic 4D flow MRI in under two minutes: Feasibility and impact of resolution, k‐space sampling patterns, and respiratory navigator gating on hemodynamic measurements , 2018, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  J. Westenberg,et al.  In‐scan and scan–rescan assessment of LV in‐ and outflow volumes by 4D flow MRI versus 2D planimetry , 2017, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[29]  S. Plein,et al.  Comparison of fast acquisition strategies in whole‐heart four‐dimensional flow cardiac MR: Two‐center, 1.5 Tesla, phantom and in vivo validation study , 2017, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[30]  Pankaj Garg,et al.  Clinical applications of intra-cardiac four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance: A systematic review , 2017, International journal of cardiology.

[31]  M. Markl,et al.  Aortic Valve Stenosis Alters Expression of Regional Aortic Wall Shear Stress: New Insights From a 4‐Dimensional Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of 571 Subjects , 2017, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[32]  M. Bowdish,et al.  Surgery for Diseases of the Aortic Root. , 2017, Cardiology clinics.

[33]  Y. Takehara,et al.  Characterizing saccular aortic arch aneurysms from the geometry‐flow dynamics relationship , 2017, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[34]  S. Kozerke,et al.  Turbulent Kinetic Energy Assessed by Multipoint 4-Dimensional Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging Provides Additional Information Relative to Echocardiography for the Determination of Aortic Stenosis Severity , 2017, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[35]  Michael Markl,et al.  Altered aortic 3D hemodynamics and geometry in pediatric Marfan syndrome patients , 2017, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[36]  J. Westenberg,et al.  Comparative Evaluation of Flow Quantification across the Atrioventricular Valve in Patients with Functional Univentricular Heart after Fontan's Surgery and Healthy Controls: Measurement by 4D Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Streamline Visualization , 2017, Congenital heart disease.

[37]  C. A. Figueroa,et al.  Functional assessment of thoracic aortic aneurysms – the future of risk prediction? , 2017, British medical bulletin.

[38]  J. Bavaria,et al.  The Sievers Classification of the Bicuspid Aortic Valve for the Perioperative Echocardiographer: The Importance of Valve Phenotype for Aortic Valve Repair in the Era of the Functional Aortic Annulus. , 2016, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[39]  M. Alley,et al.  Hemodynamic Analysis of Endoleaks After Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair by Using 4-Dimensional Flow-Sensitive Magnetic Resonance Imaging. , 2016, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[40]  G. Kim,et al.  Hemodynamic Measurement Using Four-Dimensional Phase-Contrast MRI: Quantification of Hemodynamic Parameters and Clinical Applications , 2016, Korean journal of radiology.

[41]  W. Tseng,et al.  Does altered aortic flow in marfan syndrome relate to aortic root dilatation? , 2016, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[42]  Stuart M Grieve,et al.  Use of multi‐velocity encoding 4D flow MRI to improve quantification of flow patterns in the aorta , 2016, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[43]  Bradley D. Allen,et al.  Evaluating the disease progression of pediatric bicuspid aortic valve patients using 4D flow MRI data , 2016, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[44]  S. Vasanawala,et al.  Qualitative grading of aortic regurgitation: a pilot study comparing CMR 4D flow and echocardiography , 2015, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[45]  Michael Markl,et al.  Valve-Related Hemodynamics Mediate Human Bicuspid Aortopathy: Insights From Wall Shear Stress Mapping. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[46]  M. Markl,et al.  4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement , 2015, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[47]  Petter Dyverfeldt,et al.  Turbulent kinetic energy in normal and myopathic left ventricles , 2015, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[48]  Michael D Hope,et al.  4D flow MRI applications for aortic disease. , 2015, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[49]  Friedhelm Beyersdorf,et al.  Four-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging-derived ascending aortic flow eccentricity and flow compression are linked to aneurysm morphology†. , 2014, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[50]  H. Kauczor,et al.  Noninvasive 4D pressure difference mapping derived from 4D flow MRI in patients with repaired aortic coarctation: comparison with young healthy volunteers , 2013, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[51]  K. Eagle,et al.  Thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[52]  Jing Liu,et al.  Highly accelerated aortic 4D flow MR imaging with variable-density random undersampling. , 2014, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[53]  Boudewijn P F Lelieveldt,et al.  Vortex flow during early and late left ventricular filling in normal subjects: quantitative characterization using retrospectively-gated 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance and three-dimensional vortex core analysis , 2014, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[54]  Michael Markl,et al.  Viscous energy loss in the presence of abnormal aortic flow , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[55]  Anja Hennemuth,et al.  Pressure fields by flow-sensitive, 4D, velocity-encoded CMR in patients with aortic coarctation. , 2014, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[56]  A. Della Corte,et al.  The ascending aorta with bicuspid aortic valve: a phenotypic classification with potential prognostic significance. , 2014, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[57]  Y. Bossé,et al.  Bicuspid aortic valve: identifying knowledge gaps and rising to the challenge from the International Bicuspid Aortic Valve Consortium (BAVCon). , 2014, Circulation.

[58]  Thoralf M Sundt,et al.  2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[59]  H. Kauczor,et al.  Noninvasive pressure difference mapping derived from 4D flow MRI in patients with unrepaired and repaired aortic coarctation. , 2014, Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy.

[60]  Bradley D. Allen,et al.  4D flow imaging with MRI. , 2014, Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy.

[61]  M. Markl,et al.  4D flow magnetic resonance imaging in bicuspid aortic valve disease demonstrates altered distribution of aortic blood flow helicity , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[62]  Rossella Fattori,et al.  The role of imaging in aortic dissection and related syndromes. , 2014, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[63]  Michael Markl,et al.  Bicuspid Aortic Cusp Fusion Morphology Alters Aortic Three-Dimensional Outflow Patterns, Wall Shear Stress, and Expression of Aortopathy , 2014, Circulation.

[64]  M. Chu,et al.  Bicuspid aortic valve disease , 2013, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[65]  M. Langer,et al.  Aortic wall shear stress in Marfan syndrome , 2013, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[66]  C. François Noninvasive imaging workup of patients with vascular disease. , 2013, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[67]  Michael Markl,et al.  Wall shear stress and flow patterns in the ascending aorta in patients with bicuspid aortic valves differ significantly from tricuspid aortic valves: a prospective study. , 2013, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[68]  Stefan Neubauer,et al.  Aortic Dilation in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease: Flow Pattern Is a Major Contributor and Differs With Valve Fusion Type , 2013, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[69]  Alex Frydrychowicz,et al.  Aortic pulse wave velocity measurements with undersampled 4D flow‐sensitive MRI: comparison with 2D and algorithm determination , 2013, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[70]  J. Chambers,et al.  Prognostic Value of Energy Loss Index in Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis , 2013, Circulation.

[71]  S. Sherwin,et al.  Does low and oscillatory wall shear stress correlate spatially with early atherosclerosis? A systematic review , 2013, Cardiovascular research.

[72]  E. Tseng,et al.  Magnetic resonance measurement of turbulent kinetic energy for the estimation of irreversible pressure loss in aortic stenosis. , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[73]  M. Langer,et al.  Evaluation of 3D blood flow patterns and wall shear stress in the normal and dilated thoracic aorta using flow-sensitive 4D CMR , 2012, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[74]  Michael Lustig,et al.  Evaluation of valvular insufficiency and shunts with parallel-imaging compressed-sensing 4D phase-contrast MR imaging with stereoscopic 3D velocity-fusion volume-rendered visualization. , 2012, Radiology.

[75]  David Saloner,et al.  Imaging biomarkers of aortic disease: increased growth rates with eccentric systolic flow. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[76]  Werner Vach,et al.  Analysis of pulse wave velocity in the thoracic aorta by flow‐sensitive four‐dimensional MRI: Reproducibility and correlation with characteristics in patients with aortic atherosclerosis , 2012, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[77]  T. Schaeffter,et al.  A new imaging method for assessment of aortic dissection using four-dimensional phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging. , 2012, Journal of vascular surgery.

[78]  Michael Markl,et al.  Aortic flow patterns in patients with Marfan syndrome assessed by flow‐sensitive four‐dimensional MRI , 2012, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[79]  Scott B Reeder,et al.  4D cardiovascular magnetic resonance velocity mapping of alterations of right heart flow patterns and main pulmonary artery hemodynamics in tetralogy of Fallot , 2012, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[80]  D. Saloner,et al.  Comparison of four‐dimensional flow parameters for quantification of flow eccentricity in the ascending aorta , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[81]  Michael D Hope,et al.  4D flow CMR in assessment of valve-related ascending aortic disease. , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[82]  F. Neumann,et al.  Inconsistent grading of aortic valve stenosis by current guidelines: haemodynamic studies in patients with apparently normal left ventricular function , 2010, Heart.

[83]  David M. Williams,et al.  2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Ame , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[84]  David Saloner,et al.  Clinical evaluation of aortic coarctation with 4D flow MR imaging , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[85]  A. Barker,et al.  Quantification of Hemodynamic Wall Shear Stress in Patients with Bicuspid Aortic Valve Using Phase-Contrast MRI , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[86]  T. Schaeffter,et al.  Four‐dimensional (4D) flow of the whole heart and great vessels using real‐time respiratory self‐gating , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[87]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Flow Assessment Through Four Heart Valves Simultaneously Using 3-Dimensional 3-Directional Velocity-Encoded Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Retrospective Valve Tracking in Healthy Volunteers and Patients With Valvular Regurgitation , 2009, Investigative radiology.

[88]  R. Herfkens,et al.  Initial experience characterizing a type I endoleak from velocity profiles using time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI. , 2009, Journal of vascular surgery.

[89]  Johan H C Reiber,et al.  Mitral valve and tricuspid valve blood flow: accurate quantification with 3D velocity-encoded MR imaging with retrospective valve tracking. , 2008, Radiology.

[90]  J. Hennig,et al.  Time-resolved magnetic resonance angiography and flow-sensitive 4-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla for blood flow and wall shear stress analysis. , 2008, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[91]  Friedhelm Beyersdorf,et al.  Flow-sensitive four-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging: flow patterns in ascending aortic aneurysms. , 2008, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[92]  Arik Wolak,et al.  Aortic size assessment by noncontrast cardiac computed tomography: normal limits by age, gender, and body surface area. , 2008, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[93]  M. Alley,et al.  Comparison of flow patterns in ascending aortic aneurysms and volunteers using four‐dimensional magnetic resonance velocity mapping , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[94]  H. Sievers,et al.  A classification system for the bicuspid aortic valve from 304 surgical specimens. , 2007, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[95]  E. Lansac,et al.  Dilation of the thoracic aorta: medical and surgical management , 2006, Heart.

[96]  John A Elefteriades,et al.  Mechanical deterioration underlies malignant behavior of aneurysmal human ascending aorta. , 2005, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[97]  Michael Markl,et al.  Time-resolved three-dimensional magnetic resonance velocity mapping of aortic flow in healthy volunteers and patients after valve-sparing aortic root replacement. , 2005, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[98]  Jan Engvall,et al.  Flow patterns in the aortic root and the aorta studied with time-resolved, 3-dimensional, phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging: implications for aortic valve-sparing surgery. , 2004, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[99]  Jeffrey R Basford,et al.  The Law of Laplace and its relevance to contemporary medicine and rehabilitation. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[100]  S. Alper,et al.  Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. , 1999, JAMA.

[101]  René M. Botnar,et al.  Submillimeter three-dimensional coronary MR angiography with real-time navigator correction: comparison of navigator locations. , 1999, Radiology.

[102]  W. Edwards,et al.  Congenitally bicuspid aortic valves: a surgical pathology study of 542 cases (1991 through 1996) and a literature review of 2,715 additional cases. , 1999, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[103]  G. Hamilton,et al.  Suggested standards for reporting on arterial aneurysms. , 1992, Journal of vascular surgery.

[104]  A. Angelini,et al.  The morphology of the normal aortic valve as compared with the aortic valve having two leaflets. , 1989, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[105]  V. McKusick,et al.  The Marfan syndrome: diagnosis and management. , 1979, The New England journal of medicine.

[106]  W. Roberts,et al.  The congenitally bicuspid aortic valve. A study of 85 autopsy cases. , 1970, The American journal of cardiology.