Examining employee compliance with organizational surveillance and monitoring

Although the prevalence of employee monitoring and surveillance technologies (MSTs; e.g. e-mail monitoring) is increasing, very little research has explored the question of whether employees simply accept these systems (compliance) or enact strategies for thwarting them (resistance). In the present study, we proposed a framework based on the theory of planned behaviour and ethical decision making research to predict employees' MST compliance and resistance intentions. We proposed that organizational commitment, organizational identification, and attitudes towards surveillance would predict intentions, with the relationships between attitudes and intentions being moderated by employees' perceived behavioural control and social norms. Moderated multiple regression models were tested and provided support for predictions about the attitudinal and belief constructs, and partial support for predictions about behavioural control and norms. Implications for organizational MST policies and practices are discussed.

[1]  Herman Aguinis,et al.  Statistical Power with Moderated Multiple Regression in Management Research , 1995 .

[2]  J. Rotter Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. , 1966, Psychological monographs.

[3]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[4]  J. Greenberg Employee Theft as a Reaction to Underpayment Inequity: The Hidden Cost of Pay Cuts , 1990 .

[5]  Elayne W. Coakes,et al.  Socio-Technical and Human Cognition Elements of Information Systems , 2002 .

[6]  Jeffrey M. Stanton,et al.  Information technology and privacy: a boundary management perspective , 2003 .

[7]  R. Bennett,et al.  Development of a measure of workplace deviance. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[8]  Milton D. Hakel,et al.  Attitudes toward Surveys: Development of a Measure and Its Relationship to Respondent Behavior , 2001 .

[9]  Bart Victor,et al.  The Organizational Bases of Ethical Work Climates , 1988 .

[10]  Herman Aguinis,et al.  Statistical power problems with moderated multiple regression in management research. , 1995 .

[11]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Prediction of goal directed behaviour: Attitudes, intentions and perceived behavioural control , 1986 .

[12]  Jeffrey M. Stanton,et al.  Reactions to Employee Performance Monitoring: Framework, Review, and Research Directions , 2000 .

[13]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[14]  Jeffrey D. Kromrey,et al.  Mean Centering in Moderated Multiple Regression: Much Ado about Nothing , 1998 .

[15]  David Holman,et al.  The Effects of Performance Monitoring on Emotional Labor and Well-Being in Call Centers , 2002 .

[16]  Fred A. Mael,et al.  Identifying Organizational Identification , 1992 .

[17]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[18]  J. Webster,et al.  Where is the line between benign and invasive? An examination of psychological barriers to the acceptance of awareness monitoring systems , 2002 .

[19]  Max H. Bazerman,et al.  Power balance and the rationality of outcomes in matching markets. , 1991 .

[20]  Bradley J. Alge,et al.  Effects of computer surveillance on perceptions of privacy and procedural justice. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[21]  G J Lautenschlager,et al.  A Comparison of Alternatives to Conducting Monte Carlo Analyses for Determining Parallel Analysis Criteria. , 1989, Multivariate behavioral research.

[22]  L. Treviño Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model , 1986 .

[23]  Jeffrey M. Stanton,et al.  Effects of Workplace Monitoring Policies on Potential Employment Discrimination and Organizational Attractiveness for African Americans in the Technical Professions , 2003 .

[24]  Stuart A. Youngblood,et al.  Bad apples in bad barrels: A causal analysis of ethical decision-making behavior. , 1990 .

[25]  J. R. Aiello,et al.  Electronic performance monitoring and social context: impact on productivity and stress. , 1995, The Journal of applied psychology.

[26]  L. E. Pate,et al.  A Cognitive-Expectancy Analysis of Compliance Decisions , 1988 .

[27]  Jeffrey M. Stanton,et al.  Effects of electronic performance monitoring on personal control, task satisfaction, and task performance , 1996 .

[28]  J. R. Aiello,et al.  The role of participation and control in the effects of computer monitoring on fairness perceptions, task satisfaction, and performance. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[29]  Jeffrey M. Stanton,et al.  Organisational databases of personnel information: Contrasting the concerns of human resource managers and employees , 2003, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[30]  Jeffrey M. Stanton,et al.  Using Internet/Intranet Web Pages to Collect Organizational Research Data , 2001 .

[31]  Denise M. Rousseau,et al.  Why workers still identify with organizations , 1998 .

[32]  David B. Greenberger,et al.  Personal Control as a Mediator Between Perceptions of Supervisory Behaviors and Employee Reactions , 1988 .

[33]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[34]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. , 1977 .

[35]  John P. Meyer,et al.  AFFECTIVE, CONTINUANCE, AND NORMATIVE COMMITMENT TO THE ORGANIZATION: A META-ANALYSIS OF ANTECEDENTS, CORRELATES, AND CONSEQUENCES , 2002 .

[36]  John P. Meyer,et al.  The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization , 1990 .

[37]  R. Harper Why people do and don't wear active badges: a case study , 1995 .

[38]  Fred A. Mael,et al.  Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification , 1992 .

[39]  David B. Greenberger,et al.  Development and Application of a Model of Personal Control in Organizations , 1986 .

[40]  Audra D. Hovorka‐Mead,et al.  WATCHING THE DETECTIVES: SEASONAL STUDENT EMPLOYEE REACTIONS TO ELECTRONIC MONITORING WITH AND WITHOUT ADVANCE NOTIFICATION , 2002 .

[41]  Blair H. Sheppard,et al.  The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta-Analysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future Research , 1988 .

[42]  Bart Victor,et al.  PEER REPORTING OF UNETHICAL BEHAVIOR: A SOCIAL CONTEXT PERSPECTIVE , 1992 .

[43]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Performance monitoring: How it affects work productivity. , 1990 .

[44]  Jeffrey M. Stanton,et al.  A Detailed Analysis of Task Performance With and Without Computer Monitoring , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[45]  V. duRivage,et al.  Computer monitoring: Mismanagement by remote control , 1986 .

[46]  R. Hodson THE ACTIVE WORKER , 1991 .

[47]  Karen D. Loch,et al.  Evaluating ethical decision making and computer use , 1996, CACM.

[48]  Elizabeth M. Weiss,et al.  Electronic monitoring in their own words: an exploratory study of employees' experiences with new types of surveillance , 2000 .

[49]  Jane Webster,et al.  Personality as a moderator of monitoring acceptance , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[50]  Jeffrey M. Stanton,et al.  The impact of electronic monitoring on quality and quantity of performance , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..