Back to the future? A critical commentary on the 2003 U.S. National standard certificate of live birth.

Vital statistics documents for the United States have been revised approximately decennially throughout the past century. In this commentary we review the contents of the 2003 revision of the national standard certificate of live birth, focusing on changes from the certificates in use nationally since 1989, and identifying strengths and weaknesses of key data elements. Additional federal-state partnership funding is imperative to support the transition to the new standard certificates, and to ensure a focus on data quality at the state and national levels.

[1]  T. Connolly.  Unplanned return to operating room in a community hospital-based obstetrics and gynecology residency , 2003, The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association.

[2]  R. Kirby.  The quality of data reported on birth certificates. , 1997, American journal of public health.

[3]  R. Kirby.  Trends in labor induction in the United States: is it true that what goes up must come down? , 2004, Birth.

[4]  Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. , 2001 .

[5]  R. Hiatt,et al.  Evaluation of four maternal smoking questions. , 1999, Public health reports.

[6]  R. Kirby.  The quality of vital perinatal statistics data, with special reference to prenatal care. , 1997, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[7]  M. Khoury,et al.  The surveillance of birth defects: the usefulness of the revised US standard birth certificate. , 1996, American journal of public health.

[8]  Amy Zimmerman,et al.  Principles and core functions of integrated child health information systems. , 2004, Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP.

[9]  R. Kirby.  Analytical resources for assessment of clinical genetics services in public health: current status and future prospects. , 2000, Teratology.

[10]  L. Keith,et al.  The United States Standard Certificate of Live Birth. A critical commentary. , 1991, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[11]  J. Parker,et al.  Mind the Gap: Bridge Methods to Allocate Multiple-Race Mothers in Trend Analyses of Birth Certificate Data , 2003, Maternal and Child Health Journal.

[12]  Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes Associated with a Trial of Labor after Prior Cesarean Delivery , 2004 .