Female gray treefrogs, Hyla versicolor, are responsive to visual stimuli but unselective of stimulus characteristics

The visual ecology of nocturnal anurans is poorly understood, but there is growing evidence that vision plays a role in important behaviors such as mate choice. While several recent studies have demonstrated that females are responsive to visual cues when selecting mates, the forces responsible for these preferences are unknown. We investigated the responsiveness of female gray treefrogs, Hyla versicolor, to video playbacks of calling conspecific males in which we varied attributes of the vocal sac, a conspicuous visual characteristic of calling males and a target of female choice in other species. Females responded surprisingly strongly to the video playbacks, but did so indiscriminately with respect to variation in vocal sac characteristics. We followed up on these results with a series of additional tests that examined female responses to abstract stimuli. Females continued to respond to such stimuli, leading us to conclude that their behavior was related to a generalized phototactic response. Because of this, we were unable to make conclusions regarding female preferences for vocal sac characteristics. Nonetheless, our results are significant in two respects. First, we illustrate that despite much effort into improving video playback methodologies, challenges remain, and we offer our experimental design as a method to ensure that appropriate conclusions can be drawn from such studies. Second, we argue that the female phototactic response has potentially significant behavioral implications and in general the consequences of anuran visual preferences deserve further investigation.

[1]  H. F. Landreth,et al.  Sun-Compass Orientation of Bullfrogs , 1968 .

[2]  I. Cuthill,et al.  Sexual Selection and the Mismeasure of Color , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[3]  J. Hailman,et al.  Effects of intensity on the phototactic responses of adult anuran amphibians: a comparative survey. , 2010, Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie.

[4]  J. Hailman,et al.  Activity of Neotropical Frogs in Relation to Ambient Light , 1981 .

[5]  A.-C. Aho,et al.  Visual performance of the toad (Bufo bufo) at low light levels: retinal ganglion cell responses and prey-catching accuracy , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[6]  M. Ryan,et al.  Visual sensitivity to a conspicuous male cue varies by reproductive state in Physalaemus pustulosus females , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[7]  M. Ryan,et al.  The vocal sac as a visual cue in anuran communication: an experimental analysis using video playback , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  Eric Warrant,et al.  Vision in the dimmest habitats on Earth , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[9]  S. Robinson-Wolrath Video Playback Versus Live Stimuli for Assessing Mate Choice in a Pipefish , 2006, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[10]  B. W. Buchanan,et al.  LOW-ILLUMINATION PREY DETECTION BY SQUIRREL TREEFROGS , 1998 .

[11]  M. Théry,et al.  Costly help of audiovisual bimodality for female mate choice in a nocturnal anuran (Hyla arborea) , 2011 .

[12]  P. Narins,et al.  Bimodal signal requisite for agonistic behavior in a dart-poison frog, Epipedobates femoralis , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Dynamic properties of the advertisement calls of gray tree frogs: patterns of variability and female choice , 1996 .

[14]  A. Baierl,et al.  Chin up: are the bright throats of male common frogs a condition-independent visual cue? , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  Visual Signaling in Anuran Amphibians , 2004 .

[16]  J. Douglass,et al.  Scotopic spectral sensitivity of the optomotor response in the green treefrog Hyla cinerea. , 1993, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[17]  Jeffrey N Zeyl,et al.  Multisensory signals trigger approach behaviour in the fire-bellied toad Bombina orientalis: sex differences and call specificity. , 2011, Zoology.

[18]  B. Trainor,et al.  An evaluation of video playback using Xiphophorus helleri , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  Georg M. Klump,et al.  Phonotactic responses and selectivity of barking treefrogs (Hyla gratiosa) to chorus sounds , 1988, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[20]  Visual cues elicit courtship signals in a nocturnal anuran , 2013, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[21]  M. Ryan,et al.  Light Levels Influence Female Choice in Tiingara Frogs: Predation Risk Assessment? , 1997 .

[22]  U. Sinsch Orientation and navigation in Amphibia , 2006 .

[23]  Refractor Vision , 2000, The Lancet.

[24]  W. Fitch,et al.  Call acoustics reflect body size across four clades of anurans , 2013 .

[25]  Maxime Derex,et al.  Support for a role of colour vision in mate choice in the nocturnal European treefrog (Hyla arborea) , 2010 .

[26]  Ryan C. Taylor,et al.  Faux frogs: multimodal signalling and the value of robotics in animal behaviour , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  M. Ryan,et al.  Simulated Predation Risk Influences Female Choice in Túngara Frogs, Physalaemus pustulosus , 2011 .

[28]  J. Endler,et al.  Some comments on visual perception and the use of video playback in animal behavior studies , 2000, acta ethologica.

[29]  R. Peters,et al.  Digital video playback and visual communication in lizards , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[30]  Sarah R Partan,et al.  Issues in the Classification of Multimodal Communication Signals , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[31]  D. Blumstein Acoustic Communication in Insects and Anurans : Common Problems and Diverse Solutions , 2002 .

[32]  D E Ferguson,et al.  Sun compass orientation of the northern cricket frog, Acris crepitans. , 1967, Animal behaviour.

[33]  M. Théry,et al.  The role of nocturnal vision in mate choice: females prefer conspicuous males in the European tree frog (Hyla arborea) , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  Richard B. D’Eath,et al.  Can video images imitate real stimuli in animal behaviour experiments? , 1998 .

[35]  P. McGregor,et al.  Considerations on the use of video playbacks as visual stimuli: the Lisbon workshop consensus , 2000, acta ethologica.

[36]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  Female preference functions based on call duration in the gray tree frog (Hyla versicolor) , 2000 .

[37]  M. Ryan,et al.  Predation risk increases permissiveness for heterospecific advertisement calls in túngara frogs, Physalaemus pustulosus , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[38]  J. Hailman,et al.  Two Types of Phototactic Behaviour in Anuran Amphibians , 1971, Nature.

[39]  M. Ryan,et al.  Light Levels Influence Female Choice in Túngara Frogs: Predation Risk Assessment?@@@Light Levels Influence Female Choice in Tungara Frogs: Predation Risk Assessment? , 1997 .

[40]  J. Hailman,et al.  Phototactic responses to spectrally dominant stimuli and use of colour vision by adult anuran amphibians: A comparative survey. , 1974, Animal behaviour.

[41]  Mark A. Bee,et al.  Selective phonotaxis by male wood frogs (Rana sylvatica) to the sound of a chorus , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[42]  LEO J FLEISHMAN,et al.  Colour perception and the use of video playback experiments in animal behaviour , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[43]  Michael J. Ryan,et al.  Inter-signal interaction and uncertain information in anuran multimodal signals , 2011 .

[44]  M. Théry,et al.  Hearing is not necessarily believing in nocturnal anurans , 2010, Biology Letters.

[45]  J. Endler On the measurement and classification of colour in studies of animal colour patterns , 1990 .

[46]  M. Boeckle,et al.  Multimodal signaling in the Small Torrent Frog (Micrixalus saxicola) in a complex acoustic environment , 2013, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.