Social encounter networks: collective properties and disease transmission

A fundamental challenge of modern infectious disease epidemiology is to quantify the networks of social and physical contacts through which transmission can occur. Understanding the collective properties of these interactions is critical for both accurate prediction of the spread of infection and determining optimal control measures. However, even the basic properties of such networks are poorly quantified, forcing predictions to be made based on strong assumptions concerning network structure. Here, we report on the results of a large-scale survey of social encounters mainly conducted in Great Britain. First, we characterize the distribution of contacts, which possesses a lognormal body and a power-law tail with an exponent of −2.45; we provide a plausible mechanistic model that captures this form. Analysis of the high level of local clustering of contacts reveals additional structure within the network, implying that social contacts are degree assortative. Finally, we describe the epidemiological implications of this local network structure: these contradict the usual predictions from networks with heavy-tailed degree distributions and contain public-health messages about control. Our findings help us to determine the types of realistic network structure that should be assumed in future population level studies of infection transmission, leading to better interpretations of epidemiological data and more appropriate policy decisions.

[1]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[2]  M. Kretzschmar,et al.  Using data on social contacts to estimate age-specific transmission parameters for respiratory-spread infectious agents. , 2006, American journal of epidemiology.

[3]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[4]  A. Nizam,et al.  Containing Pandemic Influenza at the Source , 2005, Science.

[5]  Robert M May,et al.  Network structure and the biology of populations. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[6]  Mathieu Moslonka-Lefebvre,et al.  Disease spread in small-size directed networks: epidemic threshold, correlation between links to and from nodes, and clustering. , 2009, Journal of theoretical biology.

[7]  T. Geisel,et al.  Forecast and control of epidemics in a globalized world. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Mark Newman,et al.  Networks: An Introduction , 2010 .

[9]  Frank Ball,et al.  A general model for stochastic SIR epidemics with two levels of mixing. , 2002, Mathematical biosciences.

[10]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Mobile call graphs: beyond power-law and lognormal distributions , 2008, KDD.

[11]  Matt J Keeling,et al.  Contact tracing and disease control , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  Ciro Cattuto,et al.  Dynamics of Person-to-Person Interactions from Distributed RFID Sensor Networks , 2010, PloS one.

[13]  A. J. Hall Infectious diseases of humans: R. M. Anderson & R. M. May. Oxford etc.: Oxford University Press, 1991. viii + 757 pp. Price £50. ISBN 0-19-854599-1 , 1992 .

[14]  Matt J. Keeling,et al.  Networks and the Epidemiology of Infectious Disease , 2010, Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases.

[15]  M. Serrano,et al.  Percolation and epidemic thresholds in clustered networks. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[16]  N. Christakis,et al.  The Spread of Obesity in a Large Social Network Over 32 Years , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  M E J Newman,et al.  Random graphs with clustering. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[18]  C. Watkins,et al.  The spread of awareness and its impact on epidemic outbreaks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  M. Keeling,et al.  The effects of local spatial structure on epidemiological invasions , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  Bruce A. Reed,et al.  A Critical Point for Random Graphs with a Given Degree Sequence , 1995, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[21]  R. Mikolajczyk,et al.  Social Contacts and Mixing Patterns Relevant to the Spread of Infectious Diseases , 2008, PLoS medicine.

[22]  A. King,et al.  Contact Network Structure Explains the Changing Epidemiology of Pertussis , 2010, Science.

[23]  Shweta Bansal,et al.  The Shifting Demographic Landscape of Pandemic Influenza , 2010, PloS one.

[24]  M. Handcock,et al.  An assessment of preferential attachment as a mechanism for human sexual network formation , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  Thomas House,et al.  Epidemic prediction and control in clustered populations. , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[26]  Matt J. Keeling,et al.  The Impact of Contact Tracing in Clustered Populations , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[27]  L. Amaral,et al.  The web of human sexual contacts , 2001, Nature.

[28]  N. Christakis,et al.  SUPPLEMENTARY ONLINE MATERIAL FOR: The Collective Dynamics of Smoking in a Large Social Network , 2022 .

[29]  Damon Centola,et al.  The Spread of Behavior in an Online Social Network Experiment , 2010, Science.

[30]  Maria A. Kazandjieva,et al.  A high-resolution human contact network for infectious disease transmission , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  N. Ferguson,et al.  Frequent Travelers and Rate of Spread of Epidemics , 2007, Emerging infectious diseases.

[32]  William J. Reed,et al.  The Double Pareto-Lognormal Distribution—A New Parametric Model for Size Distributions , 2004, WWW 2001.

[33]  Aravind Srinivasan,et al.  Modelling disease outbreaks in realistic urban social networks , 2004, Nature.

[34]  R. May,et al.  How Viruses Spread Among Computers and People , 2001, Science.

[35]  T. Smieszek A mechanistic model of infection: why duration and intensity of contacts should be included in models of disease spread , 2009, Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling.

[36]  R. May,et al.  Epidemiology. How viruses spread among computers and people. , 2001, Science.

[37]  M. Salathé,et al.  The effect of opinion clustering on disease outbreaks , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[38]  W. Edmunds,et al.  Who mixes with whom? A method to determine the contact patterns of adults that may lead to the spread of airborne infections , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  P. E. Kopp,et al.  Superspreading and the effect of individual variation on disease emergence , 2005, Nature.

[40]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks. , 2000, Physical review letters.