Innovation and tradition-based firms: a multiple case study in the agro-food sector

Purpose Over the past few years, several scholars have focused on innovation strategies with specific regard to family food firms. In line with this research stream, the purpose of this paper is to understand how family food firms with long-standing traditions can implement innovative productions while remaining anchored to the past. Design/methodology/approach By adopting a qualitative research methodology, mainly based on a multiple case study, this paper seeks to cover some unexplored areas regarding the opportunity of combining tradition and innovation to achieve success in the highly competitive international arena in which family food firms operate. The authors analyze the cases of “La Torrente,” “Cioccolatitaliani” and “La Fabbrica della Pasta di Gragnano.” Findings Successful family food firms leverage their deep-rooted knowledge of both family and local traditions to innovate. At same time, they establish continuous info exchange flows with all of the firm’s stakeholders by adopting an open innovation approach. Research limitations/implications From a theoretical perspective, there is a need for an in-depth study of how an effective blend of tradition and innovation is formalized, above all, in family firms. As for the practical implications, all the three case studies represent a best practice, especially for family firms with a long-standing history and strong local connections. Practical implications The paper shows how important it is to keep traditional factors in food industry and offers hints and suggestions to decision makers of family firms on how to valorize, in terms of competitiveness, their traditional resources – almost bound to their territory with innovation tools and processes. Social implications The paper is interesting because it offers an analysis of a specific group of firms – family firms – that characterize many industries in Italy and in Europe. Although often small, these firms can show dynamism and creativity. The paper offers hints on how to approach innovation in the sector while keeping the value of tradition. Originality/value The originality of the proposed conceptual model stems from the need to overcome the previous theoretical models, which deal separately with sources of past knowledge and sources of new and/or external knowledge.

[1]  Sabine Brunswicker,et al.  CROSSING HORIZONS: LEVERAGING CROSS-INDUSTRY INNOVATION SEARCH IN THE FRONT-END OF THE INNOVATION PROCESS , 2010 .

[2]  Massimo Aria,et al.  Coopetition and sustainable competitive advantage. The case of tourist destinations , 2016 .

[3]  W. Vanhaverbeke,et al.  Open innovation in SMEs: How can small companies and start-ups benefit from open innovation strategies? , 2012 .

[4]  M. Terziovski Innovation practice and its performance implications in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the manufacturing sector: a resource‐based view , 2010 .

[5]  F. Malerba Sectoral systems of innovation and production , 2002 .

[6]  A. Coppola,et al.  Product and Process Innovation in the Italian Food Industry , 2010 .

[7]  W. Handler,et al.  Methodological Issues and Considerations in Studying Family Businesses , 1989 .

[8]  J. Leker,et al.  The Front End of Innovation in an Era of Industry Convergence: Evidence from Nutraceuticals and Functional Foods , 2006 .

[9]  J. Viaene,et al.  Determinants of innovation in small food firms , 2003 .

[10]  S. Massa,et al.  A knowledge management approach to organizational competitive advantage: Evidence from the food sector , 2009 .

[11]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  The Logic of Open Innovation: Managing Intellectual Property , 2003 .

[12]  Mikel Buesa,et al.  Patterns of technological change among Spanish innovative firms: the case of the Madrid region , 1996 .

[13]  K. Eisenhardt Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review , 1989 .

[14]  When Tradition Turns Into Innovation: How Firms Can Create and Appropriate Value Through Tradition , 2011 .

[15]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Motivating Creativity in Organizations: On Doing What You Love and Loving What You Do , 1997 .

[16]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[17]  Leo Paul Dana,et al.  Expanding the scope of methodologies used in entrepreneurship research , 2005 .

[18]  Klaus G. Grunert,et al.  What's in a steak? A cross-cultural study on the quality perception of beef☆ , 1997 .

[19]  Barbara Bigliardi,et al.  Innovation trends in the food industry: The case of functional foods , 2013 .

[20]  A. Banterle,et al.  Sustainability Standards and the Reorganization of Private Label Supply Chains: A Transaction Cost Perspective , 2013 .

[21]  G. D. Stefano,et al.  Technology Push and Demand Pull Perspectives in Innovation Studies: Current Findings and Future Research Directions , 2012 .

[22]  D. Teece Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation☆ , 1996 .

[23]  Soumodip Sarkar,et al.  Dynamics of open innovation in the food industry , 2008 .

[24]  A. Cigno Economics of the Family , 1991 .

[25]  Franco Malerba,et al.  Technological Regimes and Sectoral Patterns of Innovative Activities , 1997 .

[26]  Matthew T.G. Meulenberg,et al.  Innovation in the Food Industry , 2002 .

[27]  K. Pavitt Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .

[28]  L. Fulponi,et al.  Private voluntary standards in the food system: The perspective of major food retailers in OECD countries , 2006 .

[29]  S. Pascucci,et al.  Open Innovation: A Case-study of the Hungarian Wine Sector , 2013 .

[30]  D. Vrontis,et al.  Tradition and innovation in Italian wine family businesses , 2016 .

[31]  Á. Triguero,et al.  Differences in Innovation Between Food and Manufacturing Firms: An Analysis of Persistence , 2013 .

[32]  Atul Nerkar,et al.  Old Is Gold? The Value of Temporal Exploration in the Creation of New Knowledge , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[33]  Mark C. Casson The economics of the family firm , 1999 .

[34]  V. D. Corte,et al.  Entrepreneurial Creativity: Sources, Processes and Implications , 2017 .

[35]  Jens Leker,et al.  Industry Convergence and its Implications for the Front End of Innovation: A Problem of Absorptive Capacity , 2007 .

[36]  H. Knudsen,et al.  Modeling the use of innovations in private treatment organizations: the role of absorptive capacity. , 2004, Journal of substance abuse treatment.

[37]  M. Wright,et al.  Innovation Through Tradition: Lessons From Innovative Family Businesses and Directions for Future Research , 2016 .

[38]  Elkin Olaguer Pérez Sánchez,et al.  Measurement of potential absorption capacity in Colombia's innovative companies , 2017 .

[39]  D. Leonard-Barton CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[40]  Rebecca Sims Food, place and authenticity: local food and the sustainable tourism experience , 2009 .

[41]  Leonidas A. Zampetakis,et al.  Linking creativity with entrepreneurial intentions: A structural approach , 2006 .

[42]  Stefanie Bröring,et al.  Drivers of innovation in Italy: food versus pharmaceutical industry , 2016 .

[43]  Holger Schiele How to distinguish innovative suppliers? Identifying innovative suppliers as new task for purchasing , 2006 .

[44]  Gilles Lambert,et al.  Completion of knowledge codification: an illustration through the ISO 9000 standards implementation process , 2001 .

[45]  V. Albino,et al.  Search and Recombination Process to Innovate: A Review of the Empirical Evidence and a Research Agenda , 2017 .

[46]  Nina Rosenbusch,et al.  Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs , 2011 .

[47]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[48]  Jacinthe Bessière,et al.  Local Development and Heritage: Traditional Food and Cuisine as Tourist Attractions in Rural Areas , 1998 .

[49]  Ellen Enkel,et al.  Why Do Experts Contribute in Cross‐Industry Innovation? A Structural Model of Motivational Factors, Intention and Behavior , 2016 .

[50]  T. B. Ward Cognition, Creativity, and Entrepreneurship , 2004 .

[51]  S. Omta,et al.  Innovation drivers and barriers in food processing , 2009 .

[52]  M. Bell,et al.  The micro-determinants of meso-level learning and innovation: evidence from a Chilean wine cluster , 2005 .

[53]  Mohan V. Tatikonda,et al.  Product Technology Transfer in the Upstream Supply Chain , 2003 .

[54]  A. Petruzzelli,et al.  Search, recombination, and innovation: : lessons from haute cuisine , 2014 .

[55]  A. Håkansson,et al.  The Use of Networks as a Strategic Approach of Micro-Enterprises in the Agri-Food Sector , 2014 .

[56]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[57]  Chun Wei Choo,et al.  Innovation and knowledge creation: How are these concepts related? , 2006, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[58]  S. Ciliberti,et al.  External Knowledge Sources as Drivers for Cross-Industry Innovation in the Italian Food Sector: Does Company Size Matter? , 2016 .

[59]  Maria Antikainen,et al.  Motivating and supporting collaboration in open innovation , 2010 .