Performance characteristics of natural-refrigerants- based ejector expansion refrigeration cycles

Abstract The thermodynamic analyses and comparison of three natural-refrigerants-based vapour compression refrigeration cycles (ammonia, isobutane, and propane) are presented in this article using a constant pressure mixing ejector as an expansion device. Optimization of the area ratio of the ejector is done based on maximum cooling coefficient of performance (COP) and performance improvement for different operating conditions. The effect of using an internal heat exchanger is studied as well. Results show that optimum area ratio and cooling COP increases with a decrease in cycle temperature lift, whereas the COP improvement over basic expansion cycle increases with the increase in cycle temperature lift. Study shows that the optimum parameters, as well as performance using the ejector as an expansion device, are strongly dependent on the refrigerant properties as well as the operating conditions. The optimum area ratio is maximum for ammonia and minimum for propane, whereas maximum cooling COPs are similar. Using the ejector as an expansion device, propane yields a maximum COP improvement of 26.1 per cent followed by isobutane (22.8 per cent) and ammonia (11.7 per cent) for studies ranges. The effect of using an internal heat exchanger in the ejector expansion refrigeration cycle is found to be not profitable.

[1]  H. Kursad Ersoy,et al.  Performance improvement of the vapour compression refrigeration cycle by a two‐phase constant area ejector , 2009 .

[2]  Somchai Wongwises,et al.  Experimental investigation on the performance of the refrigeration cycle using a two-phase ejector as an expansion device , 2004 .

[3]  E. Nehdi,et al.  Performance analysis of the vapour compression cycle using ejector as an expander , 2007 .

[4]  Somchai Wongwises,et al.  Performance of the two-phase ejector expansion refrigeration cycle , 2005 .

[5]  Jahar Sarkar,et al.  Natural refrigerant-based subcritical and transcritical cycles for high temperature heating , 2007 .

[6]  Mortaza Yari,et al.  Cycle improvements to ejector‐expansion transcritical CO2 two‐stage refrigeration cycle , 2008 .

[7]  Alan A. Kornhauser,et al.  The Use of an Ejector as a Refrigerant Expander , 1990 .

[8]  Somchai Wongwises,et al.  Experimental study on R-134a refrigeration system using a two-phase ejector as an expansion device , 2008 .

[9]  Jahar Sarkar,et al.  Optimization of ejector-expansion transcritical CO2 heat pump cycle , 2008 .

[10]  Predrag Stojan Hrnjak,et al.  Experimental validation of a prototype ejector designed to reduce throttling losses encountered in transcritical R744 system operation , 2008 .

[11]  Mortaza Yari.  Exergetic analysis of the vapour compression refrigeration cycle using ejector as an expander , 2008 .

[12]  Alan A. Kornhauser,et al.  Performance tests of a two phase ejector , 1995 .

[13]  Somchai Wongwises,et al.  Effect of throat diameters of the ejector on the performance of the refrigeration cycle using a two-phase ejector as an expansion device , 2007 .

[14]  Eckhard A. Groll,et al.  Transcritical CO2 refrigeration cycle with ejector-expansion device , 2005 .

[15]  Pei-Xue Jiang,et al.  Particular characteristics of transcritical CO2 refrigeration cycle with an ejector , 2007 .

[16]  M Yari,et al.  Performance analysis of the ejector-vapour compression refrigeration cycle , 2007 .