Using real options to manage condition-based maintenance enabled by PHM

This work proposes a new economic approach that can form a cost-benefit-risk basis for optimum decision making for systems with prognostic capabilities, and a method to assess the value of PHM for its user after a prognostic indication. PHM potentially enables performance based logistics, condition-based maintenance, and reduced life cycle cost. When an anomaly is detected in a system, and the remaining useful life is estimated, the user has to make a decision about how to operate or manage the system given a set of constraints or requirements (e.g., to maximize availability). This paper proposes a new economic basis for evaluating the flexibility enabled by prognostic and health management systems. The proposed framework is based on Real Options theory for valuating the options arising through the use of PHM. In the context of PHM an option represents the purchase of an opportunity to take a particular action in the future. The underlying assets are not tradable securities (as they would be in financial options), but rather, they are cost avoidance opportunities or mission values. We provide two potential applications to illustrate the new model for electronic systems in a commercial aircraft used by a commercial airline, and wind farms.

[1]  Chao-Hsien Chu,et al.  A real options approach to strategic RFID investment decision , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on RFID.

[2]  Lin Li,et al.  Option model for joint production and preventive maintenance system , 2009 .

[3]  Antoine Grall,et al.  Sequential condition-based maintenance scheduling for a deteriorating system , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  M.G. Pecht,et al.  Prognostics and health management of electronics , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies.

[5]  James E. Smith,et al.  Valuing Risky Projects: Option Pricing Theory and Decision Analysis , 1995 .

[6]  Lara V. Greden Flexibility in building design : a real options approach and valuation methodology to address risk , 2005 .

[7]  Tao Wang,et al.  Real Options "in" Projects and Systems Design: Identification of Options and Solution for Path Dependency , 2008 .

[8]  Eduardo S. Schwartz,et al.  Investment Under Uncertainty. , 1994 .

[9]  Prasad Kodukula,et al.  Project Valuation Using Real Options: A Practitioner's Guide , 2006 .

[10]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  What Is Not A Real Option: Considering Boundaries for the Application of Real Options to Business Strategy , 2004 .

[11]  N. Iyer,et al.  Framework for post-prognostic decision support , 2006, 2006 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[12]  Yaobin Lu,et al.  Justifying RFID Technology in Supply Chain: A Real Options Perspective , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Information Technology and Computer Science.

[13]  T. Copeland Real Options: A Practitioner's Guide , 2001 .

[14]  Chan S. Park,et al.  ECONOMIC ANALYSIS IN THE MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, AND OVERHAUL INDUSTRY: AN OPTIONS APPROACH , 2004 .

[15]  Adam Borison,et al.  Real Options Analysis: Where Are the Emperor's Clothes? , 2005 .

[16]  Lina Bertling,et al.  An Approach for Condition-Based Maintenance Optimization Applied to Wind Turbine Blades , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[17]  Michael G. Pecht,et al.  Sensor Systems for Prognostics and Health Management , 2010, Sensors.

[18]  Sankalita Saha,et al.  Requirements Specifications for Prognostics: An Overview , 2010 .

[19]  Peter Sandborn,et al.  A Design for Availability Approach for Use with PHM , 2010 .

[20]  Walter Musial,et al.  Book Review: Offshore Wind Power , 2010 .

[21]  Peter Sandborn,et al.  A Methodology for Determining the Return on Investment Associated With Prognostics and Health Management , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[22]  James F. Manwell,et al.  Condition monitoring and prognosis of utility scale wind turbines , 2006 .

[23]  Mohammed Kishk,et al.  Determining an Appropriate Condition-based Maintenance Strategy for Wind Turbines , 2006 .