Estimates of present and future flood risk in the conterminous United States

Past attempts to estimate rainfall-driven flood risk across the US either have incomplete coverage, coarse resolution or use overly simplified models of the flooding process. In this paper, we use a new 30 m resolution model of the entire conterminous US with a 2D representation of flood physics to produce estimates of flood hazard, which match to within 90% accuracy the skill of local models built with detailed data. These flood depths are combined with exposure datasets of commensurate resolution to calculate current and future flood risk. Our data show that the total US population exposed to serious flooding is 2.6–3.1 times higher than previous estimates, and that nearly 41 million Americans live within the 1% annual exceedance probability floodplain (compared to only 13 million when calculated using FEMA flood maps). We find that population and GDP growth alone are expected to lead to significant future increases in exposure, and this change may be exacerbated in the future by climate change.

[1]  Roger A. Pielke,et al.  Human Factors Explain the Increased Losses from Weather and Climate Extremes , 2000 .

[2]  Roger A. Pielke,et al.  Precipitation and Damaging Floods: Trends in the United States, 1932-97 , 2000 .

[3]  Stanley A. Changnon,et al.  Assessment of Flood Losses in the United States , 2008 .

[4]  Doug Bellomo,et al.  An Estimate of the U.S. Population Living in 100-Year Coastal Flood Hazard Areas , 2010 .

[5]  P. Bates,et al.  A simple inertial formulation of the shallow water equations for efficient two-dimensional flood inundation modelling. , 2010 .

[6]  W. McGuire.  Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters , 2011 .

[7]  H. Winsemius,et al.  A framework for global river flood risk assessments , 2012 .

[8]  T. Stocker,et al.  Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2012 .

[9]  D. Easterling,et al.  Changes in climate extremes and their impacts on the natural physical environment , 2012 .

[10]  P. Bates,et al.  A subgrid channel model for simulating river hydraulics and floodplain inundation over large and data sparse areas , 2012 .

[11]  Brenden Jongman,et al.  Assessing flood risk at the global scale: model setup, results, and sensitivity , 2013 .

[12]  S. Kanae,et al.  Global flood risk under climate change , 2013 .

[13]  R. Muir-Wood,et al.  Flood risk and climate change: global and regional perspectives , 2014 .

[14]  J. Aerts,et al.  Flood risk and adaptation strategies under climate change and urban expansion: A probabilistic analysis using global data. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[15]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  Regional flood frequency analysis at the global scale , 2015 .

[16]  J. Aerts,et al.  Declining vulnerability to river floods and the global benefits of adaptation , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  R. Nicholls,et al.  Future Coastal Population Growth and Exposure to Sea-Level Rise and Coastal Flooding - A Global Assessment , 2015, PloS one.

[18]  Flood Loss Avoidance Benefits of Green Infrastructure for Stormwater Management , 2016 .

[19]  D. Vuuren,et al.  Global drivers of future river flood risk , 2016 .

[20]  Dai Yamazaki,et al.  The credibility challenge for global fluvial flood risk analysis , 2016, Environmental Research Letters.

[21]  V. T. Chow.  Handbook of applied hydrology , 2017 .

[22]  Kris A. Johnson,et al.  Validation of a 30 m resolution flood hazard model of the conterminous United States , 2017 .

[23]  Dai Yamazaki,et al.  Corrigendum: The credibility challenge for global fluvial flood risk analysis (2016 Environ. Res. Lett. 11 094014) , 2018, Environmental Research Letters.