Enhanced seismic source discrimination using NORESS recordings from Eurasian events

Summary The problem of discriminating between earthquakes and underground nuclear explosions is formulated as an exercise in pattern recognition approach analysis. an advantage of our procedure is flexibility, by combining both adaptive noise suppression and event classification incorporating feature selection criteria. The analysis has been applied to a learning set of 44 nuclear explosions (eight test sites) and 35 earthquakes in Eurasia recorded at the NORESS array (Fig. 1). the signal features considered were the normalized power in eight spectral bands in the 0.2-5.0 Hz range of the P wave (6 s) and the P coda (30 s). Physically, it means that we exploit potential differences in the shape of earthquake and explosion spectra, respectively. Other features included are peak P and P-coda amplitude frequencies and relative P/P-coda power. These 19 features were extracted either from conventional array beam traces or the optimum group filtered traces (OGF- removal of coherent low-frequency noise). Using the feature selection algorithm, based on estimates of the expected probability of misclassification (EPMC), only two to four features were needed for optimum discrimination performance. the dominant features were coda excitation and P- and P-coda power at lower signal frequencies. Furthermore, feature parameters extracted from the OGF traces had a slightly better performance in comparison to those extracted from beam traces. Finally, there were no misclassifications for OGF-derived features when the explosion population was limited to East Kazakh events, while including events from the other test sites lead to a decrease in discrimination power.

[1]  Karl Pieragostini Arms Control Verification , 1986 .

[2]  F. E. Whiteway,et al.  The application of phased arrays to the analysis of seismic body waves , 1965, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[3]  Frode Ringdal,et al.  Teleseismic event detection using the NORESS array, with special reference to low-yield semipalatinsk explosions , 1990 .

[4]  Thomas J. Sereno Simulation of the Detection and Location Capability of Regional Seismic Networks in the Soviet Union , 1991 .

[5]  Dag Tjøstheim,et al.  Multivariate autoregressive representation of seismic P-wave signals with application to short-period discrimination , 1978 .

[6]  G. Calcagnile,et al.  P-Wave Velocities in the Upper Mantle Beneath Fennoscandia and Western Russia , 1976 .

[7]  T. W. Anderson An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1959 .

[8]  Farid U. Dowla,et al.  Seismic discrimination with artificial neural networks: Preliminary results with regional spectral data , 1990 .

[9]  Array analysis of seismic scattering , 1990, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[10]  Steven R. Taylor,et al.  Spectral discrimination between Soviet explosions and earthquakes using short-period array data , 1991 .

[11]  Robert R. Blandford,et al.  Seismic event discrimination , 1982 .

[12]  A. F. Kushnir,et al.  Statistically optimal event detection using small array data , 1990, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[13]  Jack F. Evernden Spectral characteristics of the P codas of Eurasian earthquakes and explosions , 1977 .

[14]  Bruce A. Bolt,et al.  Nuclear explosions and earthquakes : the parted veil , 1976 .

[15]  T. W. Anderson,et al.  An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1959 .

[16]  Douglas R. Baumgardt,et al.  Investigation of teleseismic Lg blockage and scattering using regional arrays , 1990 .

[17]  E. Husebye,et al.  Teleseismic P coda analyzed by three-component and array techniques: Deterministic location of topographic P-to-Rg scattering near the NORESS array , 1990 .

[18]  D. Tjøstheim,et al.  An improved discriminant for test ban verification using short and long period spectral parameters , 1976 .

[20]  D. Tjøstheim Improved seismic discrimination using pattern recognition , 1978 .

[21]  M. G. Morgan Nuclear Arms Control: Background and Issues , 1985 .

[22]  Jack F. Evernden,et al.  An Evaluation of Seismic Decoupling and Underground Nuclear Test Monitoring Using High-Frequency Seismic Data (Paper 5R0913) , 1986 .

[23]  Ola Dahlman,et al.  Monitoring Underground Nuclear Explosions , 1977 .

[24]  Dag Tjøstheim,et al.  Multidimensional Discrimination Techniques—Theory and Application , 1981 .

[25]  Bruce A. Bolt,et al.  Nuclear explosions and earthquakes , 1976 .

[26]  Douglas R. Baumgardt,et al.  Regional seismic waveform discriminants and case-based event identification using regional arrays , 1990 .

[27]  Paul W. Pomeroy,et al.  Test ban treaty verification with regional data—A review , 1982 .

[28]  E. S. Husebye,et al.  Regional arrays and optimum data processing schemes , 1985 .

[29]  Jay J. Pulli,et al.  Regional seismic event classification at the NORESS array: Seismological measurements and the use of trained neural networks , 1990 .

[30]  Eileen S. Vergino,et al.  Soviet test yields , 1989 .

[31]  Anton M. Dainty,et al.  Studies of coda using array and three-component processing , 1990 .

[32]  A. Douglas,et al.  Seismic Source Identification: A Review of Past and Present Research Efforts , 1981 .

[33]  D. Tjøstheim Autoregressive Representation of Seismic P-wave Signals with an Application to the Problem of Short-Period Discriminants , 1975 .

[34]  K. Aki,et al.  Discriminating quarry blasts from earthquakes using coda waves , 1991, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.