Neurointerventional Procedural Volume per Hospital in United States: Implications for Comprehensive Stroke Center Designation

Background and Purpose— Availability of neurointerventional procedures is recommended as a necessary component of a comprehensive stroke center by various regulatory guidelines that also emphasize adequate procedural volumes. We studied the volumes of neurointerventional procedures performed in various hospitals across the United States with subsequent comparisons with rates of minimum procedural volumes recommended by various professional bodies or used in clinical trials to ensure adequate operator experience. Methods— We reviewed the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database in the United States for the years 2005 to 2008. Using International Classification of Disease—Clinical Modification, 9th revision, and Medicare severity diagnosis-related group codes, we identified among hospitals that admit stroke patients those that met the minimum criteria for overall and individual procedural volumes specified in various guidelines. We then compared the characteristics between the high-volume hospitals that performed at least 100 cervicocerebral angiograms and met ≥1 other procedural criterion (n=79) and low-volume hospitals (n=958). Results— Proportions of hospitals that met individual procedural volume criteria over the 4-year period according to procedure were: cervicocerebral angiography (7.0%–7.8%); endovascular acute ischemic stroke treatments (0.4%–2.6%); carotid angioplasty/stent placement (3.0%–5.3%); intracranial angioplasty/stent placement (0.3%–1.3%); and aneurysm embolization (1.3%–2.6%). There were significant trends for increasing numbers of all the endovascular procedures except intracranial angioplasty/stent placement over the course of 4 years. The high-volume hospitals were more likely to be urban teaching hospitals (70.9% versus 13.1%; P<0.001), had larger bed size (79.7% versus 26.9%; P<0.001), and had significantly higher rates of hemorrhagic stroke admissions and lower rates of transient ischemic attack admissions. Urban teaching location/status (OR, 8.92; CI, 4.3–18.2; P<0.001) and large bed size (OR, 4.40; CI, 2.0–9.5; P<0.001) remained as independent predictors of a high-volume hospital when adjusted for age, gender, risk factors, and stroke subtype. Conclusions— There are very few hospitals in the United States that meet all the neurointerventional procedural volume criteria for all endovascular procedures recommended to ensure adequate operator experience. Our results support the creation of specialized regional centers for ensuring adequate procedural volume within treating hospitals.

[1]  A. Qureshi,et al.  Outcomes After Nontraumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage at Hospitals Offering Angioplasty for Cerebral Vasospasm: A National Level Analysis in the United States , 2011, Neurocritical care.

[2]  H. Cloft,et al.  Patient Outcomes Are Better for Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysms Treated at Centers That Preferentially Treat with Endovascular Coiling: A Study of the National Inpatient Sample 2001–2007 , 2011, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[3]  D. Bravata,et al.  Metrics for Measuring Quality of Care in Comprehensive Stroke Centers: Detailed Follow-Up to Brain Attack Coalition Comprehensive Stroke Center Recommendations: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association , 2011, Stroke.

[4]  A. Qureshi,et al.  10 most commonly asked questions about training in interventional neurology. , 2009, The neurologist.

[5]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2009 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. , 2009, Circulation.

[6]  T. Jovin,et al.  Qualification Requirements for Performing Neurointerventional Procedures: A Report of the Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Neuroimaging and the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology , 2008, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.

[7]  Rajesh Aggarwal,et al.  Virtual reality simulation objectively differentiates level of carotid stent experience in experienced interventionalists. , 2007, Journal of vascular surgery.

[8]  D. Leys,et al.  Facilities Available in European Hospitals Treating Stroke Patients , 2007, Stroke.

[9]  D. Leys,et al.  The Main Components of Stroke Unit Care: Results of a European Expert Survey , 2007, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[10]  F. Verzini,et al.  Appropriateness of learning curve for carotid artery stenting: an analysis of periprocedural complications. , 2006, Journal of vascular surgery.

[11]  R. Sacco,et al.  Quality improvement in acute stroke , 2006, Neurology.

[12]  S. Cramer,et al.  Stroke care delivery before vs after JCAHO stroke center certification , 2006, Neurology.

[13]  T. Gasser,et al.  The variable phenotype of FXTAS , 2005, Neurology.

[14]  M. Hadley,et al.  Recommendations for Comprehensive Stroke Centers: A Consensus Statement From the Brain Attack Coalition , 2005, Stroke.

[15]  T. Hölzenbein,et al.  Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients , 2005, European Surgery.

[16]  Eric J. Russell,et al.  Training , Competency , and Credentialing Standards for Diagnostic Cervicocerebral Angiography , Carotid Stenting , and Cerebrovascular Intervention : A Joint Statement from the American Academy of Neurology , 2004 .

[17]  Richard Green,et al.  Clinical competence statement on carotid stenting: training and credentialing for carotid stenting--multispecialty consensus recommendations: a report of the SCAI/SVMB/SVS Writing Committee to develop a clinical competence statement on carotid interventions. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  Ims Study Investigators Combined Intravenous and Intra-Arterial Recanalization for Acute Ischemic Stroke: The Interventional Management of Stroke Study , 2004, Stroke.

[19]  A. Molyneux International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial , 2002, The Lancet.

[20]  Randall T Higashida,et al.  The learning curve for coil embolization of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[21]  R E Latchaw,et al.  Recommendations for the establishment of primary stroke centers , 2000 .

[22]  M. Leon,et al.  Acute and long-term outcome after Palmaz-Schatz stenting: analysis from the New Approaches to Coronary Intervention (NACI) registry. , 1997, The American journal of cardiology.

[23]  A. Davies,et al.  Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis , 1995, BMJ.

[24]  B. Meier,et al.  Learning curve for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: skill, technology or patient selection. , 1984, The American journal of cardiology.

[25]  S. Kelsey,et al.  Effect of investigator experience on percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 1984, The American journal of cardiology.

[26]  Eugene S. Lee,et al.  Training with simulation improves residents' endovascular procedure skills. , 2007, Journal of vascular surgery.

[27]  M. Hadley,et al.  Training, competency, and credentialing standards for diagnostic cervicocerebral angiography, carotid stenting, and cerebrovascular intervention: a joint statement from the American Academy of Neurology, the American Association of Neurological Surgeons, the American Society of Interventional and Th , 2005, Neurology.

[28]  Philip E Stieg,et al.  Training, competency, and credentialing standards for diagnostic cervicocerebral angiography, carotid stenting, and cerebrovascular intervention: a joint statement from the American Academy of Neurology, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, American Society of Interventional and Therapeuti , 2005, Radiology.

[29]  Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. , 1995, JAMA.