Convergence in telecommunications infrastructure development in OECD countries

Abstract We use a database of 22 member countries of OECD for the years 1980 to 1995 to explore the issue of convergence in the pattern of efficiency with which the telecommunications sector have been developed among OECD countries. Our approach uses data envelopment analysis (DEA) to explore the order of magnitude of performance differences between countries. We then test for σ-convergence using Friedman’s (1992) [Friedman, M., 1992. Do old fallacies ever die? Journal of Economic Literature 30, 2129–2132] suggestion that the coefficient of variance is a useful measure for this task. Thereafter, we use two rank tests – the Wilcoxon Matched-Pairs Signed Rank Test and Kendall’s Coefficient of Concordance – to evaluate the presence of β-convergence or intra-distributional mobility. Our empirical investigation suggests that OECD countries have σ-converged and also, to some extent, β-converged in their development of telecommunication infrastructures. Our empirical exploration further indicates that OECD countries have distinctly σ-converged in efficiency with which they have provided the fixed and cellular telecommunications infrastructure. Our data do not support the presence of β-convergence, or leapfrogging, in the efficiency of telecommunications infrastructure provision among OECD countries.

[1]  Boaz Golany,et al.  Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions , 1985 .

[2]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[3]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[4]  Stephen Broadberry,et al.  Manufacturing and the Convergence Hypothesis: What the Long-Run Data Show , 1993, The Journal of Economic History.

[5]  A. Charnes,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis Theory, Methodology and Applications , 1995 .

[6]  D. Dollar Convergence of South Korean productivity on West German levels, 1966-1978 , 1991 .

[7]  G. Boyle,et al.  A Simple Measure of Beta-Convergence , 1997 .

[8]  D. Quah Galton's Fallacy and Tests of the Convergence Hypothesis (Now published in Scandinavian Journal of Economics 95 (4), 1993, pp.427-443.) , 1993 .

[9]  X. Sala-i-Martin,et al.  The Classical Approach to Convergence Analysis , 1996 .

[10]  Danny Quah,et al.  Empirical cross-section dynamics in economic growth , 1993 .

[11]  William J. Baumol,et al.  Convergence of Productivity: Cross-National Studies and Historical Evidence , 1994 .

[12]  C. I. Jones,et al.  Productivity across industries and countries : time series theory and evidence , 1996 .

[13]  Danny Quah,et al.  Twin peaks : growth and convergence in models of distribution dynamics , 1996 .

[14]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Recent developments in dea : the mathematical programming approach to frontier analysis , 1990 .

[15]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Data envelopment analysis: The evolution of the state of the art (1978–1995) , 1996 .

[16]  J. Cubbin,et al.  Public Sector Efficiency Measurement: Applications of Data Envelopment Analysis , 1992 .

[17]  M. Friedman Do Old Fallacies Ever Die , 1992 .

[18]  R. Nelson Diffusion of Development: Post-World War II Convergence among Advanced Industrial Nations , 1991 .

[19]  M. Kendall,et al.  Rank Correlation Methods , 1949 .

[20]  M. Farrell The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[21]  T. Sincich,et al.  Statistics for business and economics , 1978 .

[22]  Sumit K. Majumdar,et al.  X-efficiency in emerging competitive markets: The case of U.S. telecommunications , 1995 .