Nanoscale Morphology of Doctor Bladed versus Spin‐Coated Organic Photovoltaic Films

Recent advances in efficiency of organic photovoltaics are driven by judicious selection of processing conditions that result in a “desired” morphology. An important theme of morphology research is quantifying the effect of processing conditions on morphology and relating it to device efficiency. State-of-the-art morphology quantification methods provide film-averaged or 2D-projected features that only indirectly correlate with performance, making causal reasoning nontrivial. Accessing the 3D distribution of material, however, provides a means of directly mapping processing to performance. In this paper, two recently developed techniques are integrated—reconstruction of 3D morphology and subsequent conversion into intuitive morphology descriptors —to comprehensively image and quantify morphology. These techniques are applied on films generated by doctor blading and spin coating, additionally investigating the effect of thermal annealing. It is found that morphology of all samples exhibits very high connectivity to electrodes. Not surprisingly, thermal annealing consistently increases the average domain size in the samples, aiding exciton generation. Furthermore, annealing also improves the balance of interfaces, enhancing exciton dissociation. A comparison of morphology descriptors impacting each stage of photophysics (exciton generation, dissociation, and charge transport) reveals that spin-annealed sample exhibits superior morphology-based performance indicators. This suggests substantial room for improvement of blade-based methods (process optimization) for morphology tuning to enhance performance of large area devices.

[1]  Olga Wodo,et al.  Quantifying organic solar cell morphology: a computational study of three-dimensional maps , 2013 .

[2]  John R. Reynolds,et al.  A round robin study of flexible large-area roll-to-roll processed polymer solar cell modules , 2009 .

[3]  Frederik C. Krebs,et al.  Polymer solar cell modules prepared using roll-to-roll methods: Knife-over-edge coating, slot-die coating and screen printing , 2009 .

[4]  Adrien Pierre,et al.  All‐Printed Flexible Organic Transistors Enabled by Surface Tension‐Guided Blade Coating , 2014, Advanced materials.

[5]  A. Moulé Power from plastic , 2010 .

[6]  Christoph J. Brabec,et al.  Air-processed polymer tandem solar cells with power conversion efficiency exceeding 10% , 2015 .

[7]  B. Ganapathysubramanian,et al.  Morphology control in polymer blend fibers—a high throughput computing approach , 2016 .

[8]  J. Roehling,et al.  Three‐Dimensional Concentration Mapping of Organic Blends , 2013 .

[9]  N. Greenham,et al.  The effect of morphology upon mobility: Implications for bulk heterojunction solar cells with nonuniform blend morphology , 2009 .

[10]  Yi Cui,et al.  Scalable coating and properties of transparent, flexible, silver nanowire electrodes. , 2010, ACS nano.

[11]  S. Horng,et al.  Simultaneous enhancement in both large-area coatability and photovoltaic performance of inverted organic solar cells with co-solvent , 2014 .

[12]  S Bals,et al.  Advanced reconstruction algorithms for electron tomography: from comparison to combination. , 2013, Ultramicroscopy.

[13]  J. Roehling,et al.  Material profile influences in bulk‐heterojunctions , 2014 .

[14]  Frederik C. Krebs,et al.  All solution roll-to-roll processed polymer solar cells free from indium-tin-oxide and vacuum coating steps , 2009 .

[15]  He Yan,et al.  Aggregation and morphology control enables multiple cases of high-efficiency polymer solar cells , 2014, Nature Communications.

[16]  Garry Rumbles,et al.  Performance of bulk heterojunction photovoltaic devices prepared by airbrush spray deposition , 2008 .

[17]  A. Schneider,et al.  Analysis and optimization of relevant parameters of blade coating and gravure printing processes for the fabrication of highly efficient organic solar cells , 2014 .

[18]  Yang Yang,et al.  High-efficiency solution processable polymer photovoltaic cells by self-organization of polymer blends , 2005 .

[19]  Xiaoniu Yang,et al.  Nanoscale morphology of high-performance polymer solar cells. , 2005, Nano letters.

[20]  Sheng-Fu Horng,et al.  Large-area organic solar cells by accelerated blade coating , 2015 .

[21]  D. Venkataraman,et al.  Indoor light recycling: a new home for organic photovoltaics , 2016 .

[22]  S. Darling,et al.  Morphology characterization in organic and hybrid solar cells , 2012 .

[23]  M. Muccini,et al.  Impact of environmentally friendly processing on polymer solar cells: Performance, thermal stability and morphological study by imaging techniques , 2016 .

[24]  Kohshin Takahashi,et al.  Relation between carrier mobility and cell performance in bulk heterojunction solar cells consisting of soluble polythiophene and fullerene derivatives , 2005 .

[25]  Jan Sijbers,et al.  The ASTRA Toolbox: A platform for advanced algorithm development in electron tomography. , 2015, Ultramicroscopy.

[26]  Jianhui Hou,et al.  Breaking the 10% Efficiency Barrier in Organic Photovoltaics: Morphology and Device Optimization of Well‐Known PBDTTT Polymers , 2016 .

[27]  Valentin D. Mihailetchi,et al.  Device Physics of Polymer:Fullerene Bulk Heterojunction Solar Cells , 2007 .

[28]  Guillermo C Bazan,et al.  Bulk heterojunction solar cells: morphology and performance relationships. , 2014, Chemical reviews.

[29]  R. J. Kline,et al.  Effect of Processing Additives on the Solidification of Blade‐Coated Polymer/Fullerene Blend Films via In‐Situ Structure Measurements , 2013 .

[30]  J R Kremer,et al.  Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. , 1996, Journal of structural biology.

[31]  Markus Hösel,et al.  Large scale deployment of polymer solar cells on land, on sea and in the air , 2014 .

[32]  P. Blom,et al.  Exciton diffusion in organic semiconductors , 2015 .

[33]  Tae-Woo Lee,et al.  Three‐Dimensional Bulk Heterojunction Morphology for Achieving High Internal Quantum Efficiency in Polymer Solar Cells , 2009 .

[34]  Edward Van Keuren,et al.  Endohedral fullerenes for organic photovoltaic devices. , 2009, Nature materials.

[35]  Uli Lemmer,et al.  In situ monitoring the drying kinetics of knife coated polymer-fullerene films for organic solar cells , 2009 .

[36]  S. Tolbert,et al.  Comparing matched polymer:Fullerene solar cells made by solution-sequential processing and traditional blend casting: Nanoscale structure and device performance , 2014 .

[37]  Christoph J. Brabec,et al.  Large area slot-die coated organic solar cells on flexible substrates with non-halogenated solution formulations , 2014 .

[38]  R. Joseph Kline,et al.  Nanoscale structure measurements for polymer-fullerene photovoltaics , 2012 .

[39]  Steven Abbott,et al.  Determination of Solubility Parameters for Organic Semiconductor Formulations , 2011 .

[40]  Volker Schmidt,et al.  The effect of three-dimensional morphology on the efficiency of hybrid polymer solar cells. , 2009, Nature materials.

[41]  Ole Hagemann,et al.  A complete process for production of flexible large area polymer solar cells entirely using screen printing—First public demonstration , 2009 .

[42]  Olga Wodo,et al.  Computational characterization of bulk heterojunction nanomorphology , 2012 .

[43]  O. Inganäs,et al.  Nanomorphology of Bulk Heterojunction Organic Solar Cells in 2D and 3D Correlated to Photovoltaic Performance , 2009 .

[44]  Christoph J. Brabec,et al.  Topographical and morphological aspects of spray coated organic photovoltaics , 2009 .

[45]  Christoph J. Brabec,et al.  Towards large-scale production of solution-processed organic tandem modules based on ternary composites: Design of the intermediate layer, device optimization and laser based module processing , 2014 .

[46]  David S. Germack,et al.  Interfacial Segregation in Polymer/Fullerene Blend Films for Photovoltaic Devices , 2010 .

[47]  Klaus Meerholz,et al.  Controlling Morphology in Polymer–Fullerene Mixtures , 2008 .

[48]  I. McCulloch,et al.  Reduced voltage losses yield 10% efficient fullerene free organic solar cells with >1 V open circuit voltages† †Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c6ee02598f Click here for additional data file. , 2016, Energy & environmental science.

[49]  Stephen R. Forrest,et al.  Small molecular weight organic thin-film photodetectors and solar cells , 2003 .

[50]  A. Herzing,et al.  3D Nanoscale Characterization of Thin-Film Organic Photovoltaic Device Structures via Spectroscopic Contrast in the TEM 1 , 2010 .

[51]  R. J. Kline,et al.  Molecular order in high-efficiency polymer/fullerene bulk heterojunction solar cells. , 2011, ACS nano.

[52]  C. Brabec,et al.  Nanoscale Morphology of PTB7 Based Organic Photovoltaics as a Function of Fullerene Size , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[53]  F. Krebs,et al.  A roll-to-roll process to flexible polymer solar cells: model studies, manufacture and operational stability studies , 2009 .

[54]  George D. Spyropoulos,et al.  Air-processed organic tandem solar cells on glass: toward competitive operating lifetimes , 2015 .

[55]  Klaus Meerholz,et al.  The effect of active layer thickness and composition on the performance of bulk-heterojunction solar cells , 2006 .

[56]  Juhwan Kim,et al.  Fabrication of organic bulk heterojunction solar cells by a spray deposition method for low-cost power generation , 2007 .

[57]  Xiong Gong,et al.  Thermally Stable, Efficient Polymer Solar Cells with Nanoscale Control of the Interpenetrating Network Morphology , 2005 .

[58]  David S. Germack,et al.  Substrate-dependent interface composition and charge transport in films for organic photovoltaics , 2009 .

[59]  Reuben T. Collins,et al.  Ultrasonic spray deposition for production of organic solar cells , 2009 .

[60]  B. Holloway,et al.  Tuning Conversion Efficiency in Metallo Endohedral Fullerene‐Based Organic Photovoltaic Devices , 2009 .

[61]  Paul Heremans,et al.  Determination of Solvent Systems for Blade Coating Thin Film Photovoltaics , 2015 .

[62]  A J Heeger,et al.  Efficiency enhancement in low-bandgap polymer solar cells by processing with alkane dithiols. , 2007, Nature materials.

[63]  Siew Lay Lim,et al.  High performance organic photovoltaic cells with blade-coated active layers , 2012 .

[64]  P. Blom,et al.  Systematic study of exciton diffusion length in organic semiconductors by six experimental methods , 2014 .

[65]  Kees Joost Batenburg,et al.  The properties of SIRT, TVM, and DART for 3D imaging of tubular domains in nanocomposite thin-films and sections. , 2014, Ultramicroscopy.

[66]  Olga Wodo,et al.  A graph-based formulation for computational characterization of bulk heterojunction morphology , 2012 .

[67]  A. Hexemer,et al.  Mesoscopic Structural Length Scales in P3HT/PCBM Mixtures Remain Invariant for Various Processing Conditions , 2013 .

[68]  Oliver Ambacher,et al.  Effects of solvent and annealing on the improved performance of solar cells based on poly(3-hexylthiophene): Fullerene , 2005 .

[69]  K. Müllen,et al.  Large-area bi-component processing of organic semiconductors by spray deposition and spin coating with orthogonal solvents , 2009 .

[70]  C. J. M. Emmott,et al.  Reducing the efficiency-stability-cost gap of organic photovoltaics with highly efficient and stable small molecule acceptor ternary solar cells. , 2017, Nature materials.

[71]  Klaus Meerholz,et al.  Morphology Control in Solution‐Processed Bulk‐Heterojunction Solar Cell Mixtures , 2009 .

[72]  J. Loos,et al.  Relation between photoactive layer thickness, 3D morphology, and device performance in P3HT/PCBM bulk-heterojunction solar cells , 2009 .

[73]  Yang Yang,et al.  A polymer tandem solar cell with 10.6% power conversion efficiency , 2013, Nature Communications.