Packaging for eco-efficient supply chains: why logistics should get involved in the packaging development process

Abstract Purpose For packed products, packaging affects every logistical activity and thus the overall economic and ecological efficiency (eco-efficiency) of supply chains. The purpose of this research is to explore how integrated approaches are used in packaging development processes to increase eco-efficiency along supply chains and how a set of pre-selected factors influences the adoption of practically integrated approaches within companies. Methodology/approach The research approach is explorative and based on nine cases in the food and manufacturing industries in Sweden. In total, 26 semi-structured interviews were conducted. Findings The chapter describes the way in which companies work with ‘integrative’ packaging development process elements. It explores how four factors – product characteristics, packaging requirements, logistical conditions and environmental efforts – influence their approach. Research limitations/implications The study analyses the packaging development processes at a limited number of companies in Sweden. Practical implications The findings can help logistics managers to better understand how integrated approaches can be applied in packaging development processes to increase eco-efficiency of logistical processes along the supply chain. The study provides logistic managers also with information about which influencing factors can serve as facilitators or barriers to these approaches in their organisations. Originality/value Previous research has demonstrated the potential economic and environmental benefits of integrating a logistics perspective into the packaging development process. This study complements existing knowledge by presenting extensive empirical data on the practical application of integrated approaches in packaging development processes in industry.

[1]  Mauro Caputo,et al.  Internal, vertical and horizontal logistics integration in Italian grocery distribution , 1996 .

[2]  Zach G. Zacharia,et al.  DEFINING SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT , 2001 .

[3]  Theodore P. Stank,et al.  A framework for transportation decision making in an integrated supply chain , 2000 .

[4]  Rabbe Thun,et al.  Framework for Sustainable Food Packaging Design , 2013 .

[5]  Christopher A. Voss,et al.  Case research in operations management , 2002 .

[6]  Ole Jørgen Hanssen,et al.  Sustainable packaging design: a holistic methodology for packaging design , 2010 .

[7]  Christian Finnsgård,et al.  Selection of Packaging Systems in Supply Chains from a Sustainability Perspective: The Case of Volvo , 2013 .

[8]  Stuart L. Hart,et al.  DOES IT PAY TO BE GREEN? AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EMISSION REDUCTION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE , 1996 .

[9]  Stephen M. Gilbert,et al.  New managerial challenges from supply chain opportunities , 2000 .

[10]  Fredrik Nilsson,et al.  Logistics‐driven packaging innovation: a case study at IKEA , 2011 .

[11]  Mark Pagell,et al.  Understanding the factors that enable and inhibit the integration of operations, purchasing and logistics , 2004 .

[12]  D. Lambert,et al.  Supply Chain Management: Implementation Issues and Research Opportunities , 1998 .

[13]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[14]  P. K. Bagchi,et al.  Supply chain integration : a European survey , 2005 .

[15]  Giannis T. Tsoulfas,et al.  Environmental principles applicable to supply chains design and operation , 2006 .

[16]  K. Verghese,et al.  Environmental innovation in industrial packaging: a supply chain approach , 2007 .

[17]  Chris Dominic,et al.  Packaging scorecard – a packaging performance evaluation method , 2003 .

[18]  R. Narasimhan,et al.  INFORMATION SYSTEM UTILIZATION STRATEGY FOR SUPPLY CHAIN INTEGRATION. , 2001 .