Multi-criteria decision analysis techniques in aircraft conceptual design process

In aerospace systems design, conflicting disciplines and technologies are always involved in the design process. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) techniques can be helpful to effectively deal with such situations and make wise design decisions. In this paper, the feasibility and added values of applying the MCDA techniques in aircraft design are explored. A new optimization framework incorporating MCDA techniques in aircraft conceptual design process is established. An improved MCDA method is utilized to aggregate the multiple design criteria into one composite figure of merit, which serves as an objective function in the optimization process. It is demonstrated that the suitable MCDA method with improvement provides a better objective function for the optimization than the traditional weighted sum method. Considering that the inherent uncertainties and subjectivities of the weighting factors have crucial impacts on the design solution, surrogate models for the multiple design criteria in terms of the weighting factors are constructed. The constructed surrogate model can provide efficient analysis tools for uncertainty assessment.

[1]  Jean Pierre Brans,et al.  A PREFERENCE RANKING ORGANIZATION METHOD , 1985 .

[2]  M. D. McKay,et al.  A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code , 2000 .

[3]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications - A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[4]  Richard J. Beckman,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code , 2000, Technometrics.

[5]  C. Hwang Multiple Objective Decision Making - Methods and Applications: A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1979 .

[6]  Volker Gollnick,et al.  An approach to multi-fidelity in conceptual aircraft design in distributed design environments , 2011, 2011 Aerospace Conference.

[7]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[8]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  A Framework for Aircraft Conceptual Design and Environmental Performance Studies , 2004 .

[9]  Alberto Lovison,et al.  Adaptive sampling with a Lipschitz criterion for accurate metamodeling , 2010 .

[10]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  An Interactive Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization Method Based on Progressively Approximated Value Functions , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[11]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Support in Engineering Design , 1998 .

[12]  Yongchang Li,et al.  An Intelligent Multi-Criteria Decision Support System for Systems Design , 2010 .

[13]  P. Vincke,et al.  Note-A Preference Ranking Organisation Method: The PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making , 1985 .

[14]  Matthias Ehrgott,et al.  Trends in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis , 2010 .

[15]  Daniel Raymer,et al.  Enhancing Aircraft Conceptual Design using Multidisciplinary Optimization , 2002 .

[16]  Yongchang Li,et al.  An Intelligent, Knowledge-based Multiple Criteria Decision Making Advisor for Systems Design , 2007 .

[17]  Stephan Lehner,et al.  Combinatorial Optimization to Include Greener Technologies in a Short-to-Medium Range Commercial Aircraft , 2008 .

[18]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  Engineering Design via Surrogate Modelling - A Practical Guide , 2008 .

[19]  Chen Wei On the Problem and Elimination of Rank Reversal in the Application of TOPSIS Method , 2005 .

[20]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Framework for Aircraft Conceptual Design and Environmental Performance Studies , 2005 .