Potential diagnostic role of the MRI-derived internal magnetic field gradient in calcaneus cancellous bone for evaluating postmenopausal osteoporosis at 3T.

INTRODUCTION Bone mineral density (BMD) result has a low predictive value on patients' risk for future fractures. Thus, new approaches for examining patients at risk for developing osteoporosis would be desirable. Magnetic resonance (MR) investigations in cancellous bone have been shown to yield useful quantitative information on both trabecular-bone microstructure and bone marrow composition. This work was undertaken to address the hypothesis that the effective internal magnetic field gradient (IMFG), a new MR parameter, discriminates between healthy, osteopenic and osteoporotic postmenopausal women, classified on the basis of bone mineral density (BMD) criteria. The work builds on preliminary results indicating that IMFG, measured in trabecular-bone pores and quantified by spin-echo decay and water diffusion MR near the bone-bone marrow interface depends on both the bone marrow water rate of diffusion and the magnetic susceptibility difference (ΔX) between water and bone. MATERIALS AND METHODS MR relaxometry, MR spectroscopy and diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the heel was performed in fifty-five women (mean age, 62.9±6.6years) at 3T. Moreover, in order to study the reproducibility of IMFG measurement, five young women (mean age 31.0±3.2years; age range, 28-36years) were scanned and rescanned. The study protocol was approved by the local Ethics Committee. Quantitative Computer Tomography (QCT) of the L1-L3 vertebral segments was performed to classify the postmenopausal women into three groups according to QCT BMD: healthy (n=8); osteopenic (n=25); and osteoporotic (n=22). In all subjects, BMD T-scores, marrow fat content (Mfc), T2*, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and IMFG (estimated from the additional spin-echo decay due to diffusion of water in local magnetic field gradients), were assessed in the whole calcaneus as well as in three calcaneal subregions: subtalar, tuber calcaneus, and cavum calcaneus. Between-group comparisons to assess group differences and Pearson correlation analysis were performed. Short and long-term coefficients of variation (CVS and CVL, respectively) were evaluated in young subjects. RESULTS Reproducibility of the IMFG measurement was satisfactory. No significant difference was found in the IMFG measurement performed in both calcaneus and subtalar calcaneal region between the two separate sessions comprised of five young women. Mfc did not significantly differ between groups. The IMFG in the subtalar region was significantly different between all three groups (P<0.01), being greatest in healthy women, intermediate in those with osteopenia, and lowest in osteoporotic subjects. Conversely neither T2* nor ADC is able to discriminate healthy subjects from those with osteopenia and osteoporosis. Increased inter-trabecular space, as it typically occurs in patients with osteoporosis, modifies water diffusion, conferring higher ADC values, thereby lowering the IMFG. CONCLUSION The IMFG measured in the calcaneal subtalar region shows a high ability in identifying healthy subjects. The new quantitative MR method based on measurement of the IMFG may provide a new means for assessing patients with osteoporosis.

[1]  Gabriele Armbrecht,et al.  Clinical use of quantitative computed tomography and peripheral quantitative computed tomography in the management of osteoporosis in adults: the 2007 ISCD Official Positions. , 2008, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[2]  S. Capuani,et al.  Characterization of trabecular bone by dipolar demagnetizing field MRI , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  S. Capuani Water diffusion in cancellous bone , 2013 .

[4]  John C. Gore,et al.  Studies of diffusion in random fields produced by variations in susceptibility , 1988 .

[5]  J. Griffith,et al.  Bone marrow diffusion in osteoporosis: Evaluation with quantitative MR diffusion imaging , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[6]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Heterogeneity of Trabecular Bone Structure in the Calcaneus Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1998, Osteoporosis International.

[7]  J. Compston,et al.  Prevention and Management of Osteoporosis , 1997, Drugs.

[8]  Steven D. Kugelmass,et al.  Relationship between NMR transverse relaxation, trabecular bone architecture, and strength. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  F Fasano,et al.  In vitro and in vivo MR evaluation of internal gradient to assess trabecular bone density , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Y. Shibamoto,et al.  Apparent diffusion coefficient and fractional anisotropy in the vertebral bone marrow , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  S. Capuani,et al.  Multiple spin echoes for the evaluation of trabecular bone quality. , 2002 .

[12]  T R Brown,et al.  Diffusion‐based MR methods for bone structure and evolution , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  F. Schick Bone marrow NMR in vivo , 1996 .

[14]  Lindsay W. Turnbull,et al.  Age, gender, and skeletal variation in bone marrow composition: A preliminary study at 3.0Tesla , 2007 .

[15]  Felix W Wehrli,et al.  Magnetic resonance of calcified tissues. , 2013, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[16]  H. Hricak,et al.  Bone marrow imaging: magnetic resonance studies related to age and sex. , 1985, Radiology.

[17]  Umberto Tarantino,et al.  Diffusion tensor imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy assessment of cancellous bone quality in femoral neck of healthy, osteopenic and osteoporotic subjects at 3T: Preliminary experience. , 2013, Bone.

[18]  E. Sigmund,et al.  High‐resolution MRI of internal field diffusion‐weighting in trabecular bone , 2009, NMR in biomedicine.

[19]  J. Woo,et al.  Vertebral marrow fat content and diffusion and perfusion indexes in women with varying bone density: MR evaluation. , 2006, Radiology.

[20]  H. Hatipoğlu,et al.  Quantitative and Diffusion MR Imaging as a New Method To Assess Osteoporosis , 2007, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[21]  E. Purcell,et al.  Effects of Diffusion on Free Precession in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Experiments , 1954 .

[22]  A. T. Watson,et al.  Characterizing porous media with NMR methods , 1997 .

[23]  J. Cauley,et al.  The Role of Bone Marrow and Visceral Fat on Bone Metabolism , 2011, Current osteoporosis reports.

[24]  B Maraviglia,et al.  Diffusion tensor imaging to study anisotropy in a particular porous system: the trabecular bone network. , 2005, Solid state nuclear magnetic resonance.

[25]  F. Wehrli,et al.  Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Calcaneus and Femur of Women With Varying Degrees of Osteopenia and Vertebral Deformity Status , 2002, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[26]  J. Woo,et al.  Osteoporosis is associated with increased marrow fat content and decreased marrow fat unsaturation: A proton MR spectroscopy study , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[27]  S. Provencher Estimation of metabolite concentrations from localized in vivo proton NMR spectra , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  F. Wehrli,et al.  Trabecular structure: preliminary application of MR interferometry. , 1991, Radiology.

[29]  J. Kanis,et al.  Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk , 2002, The Lancet.

[30]  Ping Chung Leung,et al.  Vertebral bone mineral density, marrow perfusion, and fat content in healthy men and men with osteoporosis: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and MR spectroscopy. , 2005, Radiology.

[31]  A. Singer,et al.  Bone marrow fat and bone mineral density on proton MR spectroscopy and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: their ratio as a new indicator of bone weakening. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[32]  Felix W. Wehrli,et al.  The Calculation of the Susceptibility-Induced Magnetic Field from 3D NMR Images with Applications to Trabecular Bone , 1995 .

[33]  H. Song,et al.  Cross-sectional study of osteopenia with quantitative MR imaging and bone densitometry. , 2000, Radiology.

[34]  Robert C. Wilson,et al.  Non-commercial Research and Educational Use including without Limitation Use in Instruction at Your Institution, Sending It to Specific Colleagues That You Know, and Providing a Copy to Your Institution's Administrator. All Other Uses, Reproduction and Distribution, including without Limitation Comm , 2022 .

[35]  Bryan E. Anderson,et al.  The Netter Collection of medical illustrations , 1994 .

[36]  H. Song,et al.  Field strength and angle dependence of trabecular bone marrow transverse relaxation in the calcaneus , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[37]  F W Wehrli,et al.  Magnetic susceptibility measurement of insoluble solids by NMR: Magnetic susceptibility of bone. , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[38]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Proximal femur: assessment for osteoporosis with T2* decay characteristics at MR imaging. , 1998, Radiology.

[39]  E. Haacke,et al.  Theory of NMR signal behavior in magnetically inhomogeneous tissues: The static dephasing regime , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[40]  P. Callaghan Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Microscopy , 1991 .

[41]  S. Athavale,et al.  Internal architecture of calcaneus: correlations with mechanics and pathoanatomy of calcaneal fractures , 2010, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.

[42]  C. S. Lin,et al.  Potential value of vertebral proton MR spectroscopy in determining bone weakness. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.