Spatiotemporal representation of cardiac vectorcardiogram (VCG) signals

BackgroundVectorcardiogram (VCG) signals monitor both spatial and temporal cardiac electrical activities along three orthogonal planes of the body. However, the absence of spatiotemporal resolution in conventional VCG representations is a major impediment for medical interpretation and clinical usage of VCG. This is especially so because time-domain features of 12-lead ECG, instead of both spatial and temporal characteristics of VCG, are widely used for the automatic assessment of cardiac pathological patterns.Materials and methodsWe present a novel representation approach that captures critical spatiotemporal heart dynamics by displaying the real time motion of VCG cardiac vectors in a 3D space. Such a dynamic display can also be realized with only one lead ECG signal (e.g., ambulatory ECG) through an alternative lag-reconstructed ECG representation from nonlinear dynamics principles. Furthermore, the trajectories are color coded with additional dynamical properties of space-time VCG signals, e.g., the curvature, speed, octant and phase angles to enhance the information visibility.ResultsIn this investigation, spatiotemporal VCG signal representation is used to characterize various spatiotemporal pathological patterns for healthy control (HC), myocardial infarction (MI), atrial fibrillation (AF) and bundle branch block (BBB). The proposed color coding scheme revealed that the spatial locations of the peak of T waves are in the Octant 6 for the majority (i.e., 74 out of 80) of healthy recordings in the PhysioNet PTB database. In contrast, the peak of T waves from 31.79% (117/368) of MI subjects are found to remain in Octant 6 and the rest (68.21%) spread over all other octants. The spatiotemporal VCG signal representation is shown to capture the same important heart characteristics as the 12-lead ECG plots and more.ConclusionsSpatiotemporal VCG signal representation is shown to facilitate the characterization of space-time cardiac pathological patterns and enhance the automatic assessment of cardiovascular diseases.

[1]  J. Zbilut,et al.  Recurrence quantification analysis as a tool for nonlinear exploration of nonstationary cardiac signals. , 2002, Medical engineering & physics.

[2]  Robert Plonsey,et al.  Bioelectromagnetism: Principles and Applications of Bioelectric and Biomagnetic Fields , 1995 .

[3]  T Kobayashi,et al.  Color vectorcardiograms recorded in two unusual cases. , 1974, Chest.

[4]  G E Dower,et al.  Deriving the 12-lead electrocardiogram from four (EASI) electrodes. , 1988, Journal of electrocardiology.

[5]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Recurrence plots for the analysis of complex systems , 2009 .

[6]  K. Talwar,et al.  Spatial vectorcardiogram in acute inferior wall myocardial infarction: its utility in identification of patients prone to complete heart block. , 1989, International journal of cardiology.

[7]  Hui Yang,et al.  Local recurrence based performance prediction and prognostics in the nonlinear and nonstationary systems , 2011, Pattern Recognit..

[8]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Physionet: Components of a New Research Resource for Complex Physiologic Signals". Circu-lation Vol , 2000 .

[9]  Ch. L. Levkov,et al.  Orthogonal electrocardiogram derived from the limb and chest electrodes of the conventional 12-lead system , 1987, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[10]  Vincent Jacquemet,et al.  Vectorcardiographic lead systems for the characterization of atrial fibrillation. , 2007, Journal of electrocardiology.

[11]  G. Dower,et al.  On Deriving the Electrocardiogram from Vectorcardiographic Leads , 1980, Clinical cardiology.

[12]  Alan V. Sahakian,et al.  Vector analysis of atrial activity from surface ECGs recorded during atrial fibrillation , 2002, Computers in Cardiology.

[13]  H V Pipberger.  ADVANTAGES OF THREE LEAD CARDIOGRAPHIC RECORDINGS * , 1965, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[14]  V Iu Medziavichene.  [Vectorcardiographic diagnosis of myocardial infarction]. , 1983, Vrachebnoe delo.

[15]  L WOLFF,et al.  Spatial vectorcardiography; review and critique. , 1953, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  G E Dower,et al.  XYZ data interpreted by a 12-lead computer program using the derived electrocardiogram. , 1979, Journal of electrocardiology.

[17]  J. L. Willems,et al.  Comparison of the classification ability of the electrocardiogram and vectorcardiogram. , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.

[18]  H E Stanley,et al.  Statistical physics and physiology: monofractal and multifractal approaches. , 1999, Physica A.

[19]  Hui Yang,et al.  Linear affine transformations between 3-lead (Frank XYZ leads) vectorcardiogram and 12-lead electrocardiogram signals. , 2009, Journal of electrocardiology.

[20]  R. Komanduri,et al.  Nonlinear adaptive wavelet analysis of electrocardiogram signals. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[21]  Hui Yang,et al.  Classification of atrial fibrillation episodes from sparse electrocardiogram data. , 2008, Journal of electrocardiology.

[22]  Hui Yang,et al.  Identification of myocardial infarction (MI) using spatio-temporal heart dynamics. , 2012, Medical engineering & physics.

[23]  Aneta Stefanovska,et al.  Physics of the human cardiovascular system , 1999 .

[24]  A Benchimol,et al.  Comparison of the electrocardiogram and vectorcardiogram for the diagnosis of left atrial enlargement. , 1976, Journal of electrocardiology.

[25]  Charles Olson Msee.  The quantitative 3-diemnsional vectorcardiogram , 2000 .

[26]  Hui Yang,et al.  Multiscale Recurrence Quantification Analysis of Spatial Cardiac Vectorcardiogram Signals , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[27]  J. A. Stewart,et al.  Nonlinear Time Series Analysis , 2015 .