A community-based approach to sharing knowledge before, during, and after crisis events: A case study from Thailand

This study adopts a structuration perspective to examine the knowledge sharing activities within local communities using social media to combat the 7-month 2011 Thai flood crisis using a qualitative case study. The crisis represented a unique situation wherein social media was used extensively during the most catastrophic flood crisis in Thailand. Data were collected from focus groups and in-depth interviews with flood victims, community leaders, NGOs, politicians, large enterprises, and Army leaders. The study divides the crisis event into three phases: pre-, during-, and post-crisis, treating each as both separate and interrelated, due to the changing information needs. The socialization and structuration theories were used as theoretical lenses to investigate how social media can play an important role in knowledge sharing activities in each phase of a crisis. The case study shows that social media can be adapted to fit the information and knowledge needs in each phase. This study's findings are useful and relevant for crisis managers, and clarify the potential usefulness of social media as a knowledge sharing tool during a crisis. Case study analyzing 3 phases (pre, during, and post) of the 2011 Thai flood crisis.Adopts structuration and socialization theories to examine social media use during a crisis.Data collected from focus groups and interviews with numerous stakeholders.Information and knowledge needs, modes, and relations change as crises progress.Social media can be adapted to fit the information and knowledge needs in each phase.

[1]  Matthew R. Jones,et al.  Giddens's Structuration Theory and Information Systems Research , 2008, MIS Q..

[2]  Patric R. Spence,et al.  Screaming into the Wind: Examining the Volume and Content of Tweets Associated with Hurricane Sandy , 2014 .

[3]  A. Giddens.  Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politics , 1994 .

[4]  L. Palen.  Online Social Media in Crisis Events. , 2008 .

[5]  E. Quarantelli.  The Future is Not the Past Repeated: Projecting Disasters in the 21st Century from Current Trends , 1996 .

[6]  Alan Page Fiske,et al.  Structures of social life : the four elementary forms of human relations : communal sharing, authority ranking, equality matching, market pricing : with a new epilogue , 1991 .

[7]  Niels Ingvar Boer,et al.  Relational models for knowledge sharing behavior , 2011 .

[8]  Barbara Reynolds,et al.  Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication , 2005 .

[9]  Patric R. Spence,et al.  Expressions of risk awareness and concern through Twitter: On the utility of using the medium as an indication of audience needs , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[10]  Seonkyoung An,et al.  Crisis Communication Research in Public Relations Journals: Tracking Research Trends over Thirty Years , 2010 .

[11]  Jae-Hwa Shin,et al.  The Gulf Coast oil spill: Extending the theory of image restoration discourse to the realm of social , 2011 .

[12]  Leysia Palen,et al.  "Beacons of hope" in decentralized coordination: learning from on-the-ground medical twitterers during the 2010 Haiti earthquake , 2012, CSCW.

[13]  Gabriel Puron-Cid,et al.  Interdisciplinary Application of Structuration Theory for E-Government: A Case Study of an IT-Enabled Budget Reform , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[14]  Peter Miller,et al.  The Smart Swarm: How Understanding Flocks, Schools, and Colonies Can Make Us Better at Communicating, Decision Making, and Getting Things Done , 2010 .

[15]  John Mingers,et al.  A comparison of maturana's autopoietic social theory and giddens' theory of structuration , 1996 .

[16]  Christina Ling-Hsing Chang,et al.  The interaction of political behaviors in information systems implementation processes - Structuration Theory , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[17]  Daniel Z. Levin,et al.  The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[18]  Patric R. Spence,et al.  Twitter Use During a Weather Event: Comparing Content Associated with Localized and Nonlocalized Hashtags , 2014 .

[19]  JinKyu Lee,et al.  Web 2.0 Emergency Applications: How Useful Can Twitter be for Emergency Response? , 2009 .

[20]  R. Yin,et al.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods (4th ed. , 2009 .

[21]  Matthew W. Seeger,et al.  Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication 2012 Edition First Edition Authored By: Barbara Reynolds, Ph.D. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , 2012 .

[22]  Peter Simmons,et al.  Social media in Saudi Arabia: Exploring its use during two natural disasters , 2015 .

[23]  Dave Yates,et al.  Emergency knowledge management and social media technologies: A case study of the 2010 Haitian earthquake , 2011, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[24]  A. Giddens,et al.  Conversations with Anthony Giddens: Making Sense of Modernity , 1998 .

[25]  Murray E. Jennex,et al.  Implementing Social Media in Crisis Response Using Knowledge Management , 2010, Int. J. Inf. Syst. Crisis Response Manag..

[26]  Trudie Aberdeen.  Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. , 2013, The Canadian Journal of Action Research.

[27]  Shari R. Veil,et al.  A Work-in-Process Literature Review: Incorporating Social Media in Risk and Crisis Communication , 2011 .

[28]  P. Kollock.  SOCIAL DILEMMAS: The Anatomy of Cooperation , 1998 .

[29]  Andrea H. Tapia,et al.  Beyond the trustworthy tweet: A deeper understanding of microblogged data use by disaster response and humanitarian relief organizations , 2013, ISCRAM.

[30]  Sylwia Męcfal.  Recenzja książki. Robert K. yin, Case Study Research. Design and Methods (fourth Edition), thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2009 , 2012 .

[31]  A. Kaplan,et al.  Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media , 2010 .

[32]  A. Jaafari.  Project Management in the Age of Complexity and Change , 2003 .

[33]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[34]  Dawn R. Gilpin.  Organizational Image Construction in a Fragmented Online Media Environment , 2010 .

[35]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Information Systems for Emergency Management , 2010 .

[36]  Tanya Menon,et al.  Tainted Knowledge vs. Tempting Knowledge: People Avoid Knowledge from Internal Rivals and Seek Knowledge from External Rivals , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[37]  Shih-Ming Pi,et al.  A study of Facebook Groups members' knowledge sharing , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[38]  Karin Axelsson,et al.  Theoretical and Practical Implications from the Use of Structuration Theory in Public Sector is Research , 2014, ECIS.

[39]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[40]  B. Weitz.  Hosted By , 2003 .

[41]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[42]  Ira J. Cohen,et al.  Structuration Theory and Social Praxis , 1989 .

[43]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Introduction: Social media and collaborative systems for crisis management , 2011, TCHI.

[44]  Peter J. van Baalen,et al.  The Implications of Different Models of Social Relations for Understanding Knowledge Sharing , 2004 .

[45]  Line Dubé,et al.  Rigor in Information Systems Positivist Case Research: Current Practices , 2003, MIS Q..

[46]  Ulf Melin,et al.  Theoretical and practical implacations from the use of structuration theory in public sector information systems research , 2014, ECIS 2014.

[47]  Matthew W. Seeger,et al.  Best Practices in Crisis Communication: An Expert Panel Process , 2006 .

[48]  Gilbert Probst,et al.  Why communities of practice succeed and why they fail , 2008 .

[49]  Amanda Lee Hughes,et al.  Crisis in a Networked World , 2009 .

[50]  Cynthia D. Fisher.  Organizational socialisation: An integrative review , 1986 .

[51]  Shari R. Veil,et al.  Establishing Media Partnerships in Crisis Response , 2010 .

[52]  Anders Olof Larsson,et al.  Understanding Nonuse of Interactivity in Online Newspapers: Insights From Structuration Theory , 2012, Inf. Soc..

[53]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[54]  Archon Fung,et al.  Six Models for the Internet + Politics , 2013 .

[55]  Barney Tan,et al.  Demystifying case research: A structured-pragmatic-situational (SPS) approach to conducting case studies , 2011, Inf. Organ..

[56]  M. Chiasson,et al.  Reconciling diverse approaches to opportunity research using the structuration theory , 2005 .

[57]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[58]  M. Lamsal,et al.  The Structuration Approach of Anthony Giddens , 2012 .

[59]  J. V. Maanen,et al.  Toward a theory of organizational socialization , 1977 .

[60]  Charlie C. Chen,et al.  Lessons Learned from the Use of Social Media in Combating a Crisis: a Case Study of 2011 Thailand Flooding Disaster , 2012, ICIS.

[61]  Bartel Van de Walle,et al.  Information Systems for Emergency Response , 2003 .

[62]  Efraim Turban,et al.  Groups Formation and Operations in the Web 2.0 Environment and Social Networks , 2008 .

[63]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[64]  Patric R. Spence,et al.  Crisis Communication, Race, and Natural Disasters , 2007 .

[65]  Kalpana Shankar,et al.  Wind, Water, and Wi-Fi: New Trends in Community Informatics and Disaster Management , 2008, Inf. Soc..

[66]  Ashir Ahmed,et al.  Use of Social Media in Disaster Management , 2011, ICIS.