A Binomial and Species-Independent Approach to Trap Capture Analysis of Flying Insects

Abstract Traps for monitoring of flying insect pests constitute a critical part of integrated pest management strategies. However, interpretation of trap captures is hampered by 1) factors associated with the performance of traps (i.e., lure, trap design, placement); 2) an often poorly defined relationship between trap captures and population density; and 3) interpretation approaches being highly specific to a certain insect species, trapping method, or trapping environment. The main purpose of this study was to identify a trap capture interpretation approach with little sensitivity to characteristics specific to a given data set, which would allow easier comparison of trapping data sets and make it easier to standardize sampling plans across insect pests and trapping environments. Based on fits of trapping data sets to standard distributions (normal, Poisson, and negative binomial), evaluations of the index of aggregation, k, and linear regression coefficients from Taylor’s power law, we concluded that these characteristics varied considerably among data sets, which means that enumerative sampling plans may not be appropriate. Across 13 trapping data sets of six insect species, we showed a consistent nonlinear relationship between average trap captures and number of traps with zero captures and that the k can be stabilized by converting trapping data into binomial data. A trap interpretation approach based on number of zero captures is both easy to use, was found to be species-independent, and means that it may be possible to establish meaningful and reliable action thresholds based on trap captures of flying insects. Although developed using trapping data from food facilities, this approach may have application to trapping data from other environments as well.

[1]  C. Nansen,et al.  Sensitivity of Prostephanus truncatus (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) Flight Activity to Environmental Variables in Benin, West Africa , 2001 .

[2]  C. Nansen,et al.  The Impact of Spatial Structure on the Accuracy of Contour Maps of Small Data Sets , 2003 .

[3]  S. Naranjo,et al.  Development and evaluation of sequential sampling plans for Cryptolestes ferrugineus (Stephens) (Coleoptera: Cucujidae) infesting farm-stored wheat , 1997 .

[4]  C. Nansen,et al.  Spatial Analysis of Pheromone-Baited Trap Captures from Controlled Releases of Male Indianmeal Moths , 2006 .

[5]  Andrew M. Liebhold,et al.  Geostatistics and Geographic Information Systems in Applied Insect Ecology , 1993 .

[6]  J. M. Elliott,et al.  Some methods for the statistical analysis of samples of benthic invertebrates , 1971 .

[7]  C. Löfstedt,et al.  Reidentification of the female sex pheromone of the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella: evidence for a four‐component pheromone blend , 1999 .

[8]  G. W. Cuperus,et al.  Immigration of insects into on-farm stored wheat and relationships among trapping methods , 1997 .

[9]  T. H. Coaker,et al.  The development of an improved model trap for monitoring Ephestia cautella , 1992 .

[10]  W. Meikle,et al.  Evaluation of Sequential Sampling Plans for the Larger Grain Borer (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) and the Maize Weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and of Visual Grain Assessment in West Africa , 2000, Journal of economic entomology.

[11]  K. W. Vick,et al.  Incidence of stored-product Phycitinae moths in food distribution warehouses as determined by sex pheromone-baited traps , 1986 .

[12]  F. Arthur,et al.  Influence of trap design and location on the capture of Plodia interpunctella (Indian meal moth) (Lepidoptera : Pyralidae) in a release-recapture study , 1998 .

[13]  C. Nansen,et al.  Analysis of the insect community in a stored-maize facility , 2004, Ecological Research.

[14]  David K. Weaver,et al.  PRACTICAL USE OF SPATIAL ANALYSIS IN PRECISION TARGETING FOR INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT , 1998 .

[15]  T. R. Ahmad Effects of Pheromone Trap Design and Placement on Capture of Almond Moth, Cadra cautella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) , 1987 .

[16]  T. Baker,et al.  Cross-attraction of five species of stored-product Phycitinae (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in a wind tunnel , 1986 .

[17]  L. Torres,et al.  Developing sequential sampling plans for classifying Lasioderma serricorne (F.) (Coleoptera, Anobiidae) status in a cigarette factory , 2006 .

[18]  M. Mullen Development of a pheromone trap for monitoring Tribolium castaneum , 1992 .

[19]  Thomas W. Phillips,et al.  Comparison of direct and indirect sampling procedures for Plodia interpunctella in a maize storage facility , 2004 .

[20]  Thomas W. Phillips,et al.  Estimating Populations of Grain Beetles Using Probe Traps in Wheat-Filled Concrete Silos , 2005 .

[21]  A. Dowdy,et al.  A pheromone-baited trap for monitoring the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). , 2001, Journal of stored products research.

[22]  L. Pedigo,et al.  Analyses in insect ecology and management , 1995 .

[23]  Christian Nansen,et al.  Contour mapping and number of point observations. , 2006, Journal of economic entomology.

[24]  L. R. Taylor,et al.  Aggregation, Variance and the Mean , 1961, Nature.

[25]  W. Burkholder,et al.  Factors affecting the design of traps for stored-product insects. , 1990 .

[26]  H. Levinson,et al.  Preferential flight of Plodia interpunctella and Cadra cautella (Phycitinae) toward figures of definite shape and position with notes on the interaction between optical and pheromone stimuli , 2009 .

[27]  Paul W. Flinn,et al.  Predicting insect density from probe trap catch in farm-stored wheat 1 1 This article reports the re , 1998 .

[28]  Thomas W. Phillips,et al.  Effects of Height and Adjacent Surfaces on Captures of Indianmeal Moth (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in Pheromone-Baited Traps , 2004 .

[29]  Paul E. Smith Ecological Methods with Particular Reference to the Study of Insect Populations , 1979 .