Parotid gland tumors: Correlation between routine cytology and cytomorphometry by digital image analysis using conventional and newly introduced cytomorphometric parameters

The objective of this study was to compare qualitative cytomorphology and morphometric characteristics of parotid gland tumor cells, with the aid of a computer‐assisted system of image analysis. Routine qualitative cytologic and quantitative morphometric results from 64 parotid gland tumors were compared. Ultrasound (US)‐guided fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) specimens were taken from 54 patients. Eleven conventionally used morphometric parameters were studied: area, perimeter, convex area, convexity, maximal and minimal radius, length, breadth, form factor (FF), elongation factor, and nuclear‐ cytoplasmatic (N/C) ratio. Two newly introduced nuclear form factors were also measured: area symmetry factor and perimeter symmetry factor. The following nuclear morphometric parameters were significantly different between malignant and benign tumors: area, perimeter, convex area, convexity, maximal and minimal radius, length, breadth, FF, elongation factor, area symmetry factor, and perimeter symmetry factor. Comparing the cutoff values and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves the following nuclear morphometric parameters were found most useful in separating benign from malignant tumors: area, perimeter, convex area, maximal radius, length, and FF. The following whole cell morphometric parameters were significantly different between malignant and benign tumors: minimal and maximal radius, convexity, breadth, FF, and elongation factor. N/C ratio was significantly higher in malignant tumors. The quantitative morphometric analysis is a useful tool in the cytological differentiation between benign and malignant parotid gland tumors. Computerized image analysis may add to morphological evaluation by turning qualitative data into quantitative values. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2013;41:776–784. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  A. Bal,et al.  Basal cell adenoma: A diagnostic dilemma on fine needle aspiration cytology , 2011, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[2]  D. Babić,et al.  Digital morphometry of cytologic aspirate endometrial samples. , 2010, Collegium antropologicum.

[3]  J. Jakić-Razumović,et al.  Morphometry of tumor cells in different grades and types of breast cancer. , 2010, Collegium antropologicum.

[4]  S. Dubey,et al.  Significance of nuclear morphometry in cytological aspirates of breast masses , 2010, Journal of cytology.

[5]  M. Bukhari,et al.  Diagnostic reliability of FNAC for salivary gland swellings: A comparative study , 2009, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[6]  M. McNutt,et al.  Quantitative morphometry by image analysis of normal, hyperplastic and cancerous ductal breasts. , 2009, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[7]  J. L. St Guily,et al.  Value of the cytological diagnosis in the treatment of parotid tumors , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[8]  M. Kage,et al.  Salivary duct carcinoma cytologically diagnosed distinctly from salivary gland carcinomas with squamous differentiation , 2008, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[9]  A. King,et al.  Imaging of salivary gland tumours. , 2008, European journal of radiology.

[10]  J. Ko,et al.  Analysis of fine-needle aspiration cytology of the salivary gland. , 2008, Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi.

[11]  H. Thoeny.  Imaging of salivary gland tumours , 2007, Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society.

[12]  E. Białek,et al.  US of the major salivary glands: anatomy and spatial relationships, pathologic conditions, and pitfalls. , 2006, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[13]  H. Alphs,et al.  The role of fine needle aspiration in the evaluation of parotid masses , 2006, Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery.

[14]  navike i prijaπnje,et al.  Ultrasound of Salivary Glands , 2006 .

[15]  Hrvoje Jurić,et al.  Pojavnost karijesa u djece s obzirom na oralno-higijenske navike i prijašnje karijes iskustvo , 2003 .

[16]  D. Howlett,et al.  High resolution ultrasound assessment of the parotid gland. , 2003, The British journal of radiology.

[17]  P. Mukunyadzi.  Review of fine-needle aspiration cytology of salivary gland neoplasms, with emphasis on differential diagnosis. , 2002, American journal of clinical pathology.

[18]  G. De Vico,et al.  Nuclear morphometry in squamous cell carcinomas of canine skin. , 2002, Journal of comparative pathology.

[19]  R. Martín-Granizo,et al.  Fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) for lesions of the salivary glands. , 2000, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[20]  K. Mackenzie,et al.  Fine‐needle aspiration cytology of salivary gland: A review of 341 cases , 2000, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[21]  R. Laskawi,et al.  Cytologic diagnosis of adenoid cystic carcinoma of salivary glands , 1999, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[22]  S. Tsujitani,et al.  Computerized nuclear morphometry: a new morphologic assessment for advanced gastric adenocarcinoma. , 1999, Annals of surgery.

[23]  L. Layfield,et al.  Discrimination of benign versus malignant mixed tumors of the salivary gland using digital image analysis. , 1989, Cytometry.

[24]  A. Ferenczy,et al.  Digital imaging analysis of normal, hyperplastic and malignant endometrial cells in endometrial brushing samples. , 1988, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.