The introduction of approved document L: a study of enforced change
暂无分享,去创建一个
The majority of designers exhibit conservative rather than innovative behaviour when specifying. Earlier research found that specifiers tend to seek out products that are new to them only when their usual solution is inappropriate. In this paper we report the observation of two specifiers working in an architect’s office and their response to the introduction of Approved Document Part L, which forced them to pursue new solutions. This ethnographic study helps to illustrate different approaches to the decision-making process by individuals working within the same office and within the same organizational culture. Analysis of the specifiers’ action also helps to highlight a number of issues concerning the management of design and knowledge transfer. In particular some of the pressures associated with the adoption of a more ecologically friendly approach to design are revealed in the work reported here. A number of issues are raised for practitioners and design managers as well as identifying areas for further research, some of which is currently being addressed in ongoing research work.
[1] Catherine Cassell,et al. Qualitative methods and analysis in organizational research , 1998 .
[2] Dang X. Cu,et al. Architecture: The Story of Practice , 1991 .
[3] David Gann,et al. Do regulations encourage innovation? The case of energy efficiency in housing. , 1998 .
[4] Michael Rosen. COMING TO TERMS WITH THE FIELD: UNDERSTANDING AND DOING ORGANIZATIONAL ETHNOGRAPHY* , 1991 .
[5] Stephen Emmitt,et al. Observing the act of specification , 2001 .