Projecting biodiversity and wood production in future forest landscapes: 15 key modeling considerations.

A variety of modeling approaches can be used to project the future development of forest systems, and help to assess the implications of different management alternatives for biodiversity and ecosystem services. This diversity of approaches does however present both an opportunity and an obstacle for those trying to decide which modeling technique to apply, and interpreting the management implications of model output. Furthermore, the breadth of issues relevant to addressing key questions related to forest ecology, conservation biology, silviculture, economics, requires insights stemming from a number of distinct scientific disciplines. As forest planners, conservation ecologists, ecological economists and silviculturalists, experienced with modeling trade-offs and synergies between biodiversity and wood biomass production, we identified fifteen key considerations relevant to assessing the pros and cons of alternative modeling approaches. Specifically we identified key considerations linked to study question formulation, modeling forest dynamics, forest processes, study landscapes, spatial and temporal aspects, and the key response metrics - biodiversity and wood biomass production, as well as dealing with trade-offs and uncertainties. We also provide illustrative examples from the modeling literature stemming from the key considerations assessed. We use our findings to reiterate the need for explicitly addressing and conveying the limitations and uncertainties of any modeling approach taken, and the need for interdisciplinary research efforts when addressing the conservation of biodiversity and sustainable use of environmental resources.

[1]  T. Snäll,et al.  Epiphyte metapopulation persistence after drastic habitat decline and low tree regeneration: time‐lags and effects of conservation actions , 2013 .

[2]  B. Reineking,et al.  Models for forest ecosystem management: a European perspective. , 2007, Annals of botany.

[3]  Claire A. Montgomery,et al.  Modeling joint production of wildlife and timber , 2004 .

[4]  T. Ranius,et al.  Increased openness around retained oaks increases species richness of saproxylic beetles , 2012, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[5]  K. Miettinen,et al.  Managing a boreal forest landscape for providing timber, storing and sequestering carbon , 2015 .

[6]  Landowners’ conservation motives and the size of information rents in environmental bidding systems , 2013 .

[7]  Mikael Rönnqvist,et al.  Cost‐effective age structure and geographical distribution of boreal forest reserves , 2010, The Journal of applied ecology.

[8]  M. Marchetti,et al.  Long‐term effects of traditional and conservation‐oriented forest management on the distribution of vertebrates in Mediterranean forests: a hierarchical hybrid modelling approach , 2015 .

[9]  W. Smith,et al.  Estimated persistence of northern flying squirrel populations in temperate rain forest fragments of Southeast Alaska , 2007 .

[10]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  At Last: A Journal Devoted to Ecosystem Science , 1998, Ecosystems.

[11]  Pushpam Kumar,et al.  Forest Biodiversity and the Delivery of Ecosystem Goods and Services: Translating Science into Policy , 2011 .

[12]  S. Running,et al.  FOREST-BGC, A general model of forest ecosystem processes for regional applications. II. Dynamic carbon allocation and nitrogen budgets. , 1991, Tree physiology.

[13]  Jarrett E. K. Byrnes,et al.  A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change , 2012, Nature.

[14]  Charles ReVelle,et al.  Temporal and spatial harvesting of irregular systems of parcels , 1996 .

[15]  F. Thompson Simulated Responses of a Forest-Interior Bird Population to Forest Management Options in Central Hardwood Forests of the United States , 1993 .

[16]  Nils L. Lexerød,et al.  Recruitment Models for Norway Spruce, Scots Pine, Birch and Other Broadleaves in Young Growth Forests in Norway , 2005 .

[17]  E. Kula,et al.  Dual discounting in cost-benefit analysis for environmental impacts , 2011 .

[18]  Karin Öhman,et al.  Optimizing spatial habitat suitability and timber revenue in long-term forest planning , 2011 .

[19]  Martin Hermy,et al.  Extinction debt of forest plants persists for more than a century following habitat fragmentation. , 2006, Ecology.

[20]  D. Lindenmayera,et al.  General management principles and a checklist of strategies to guide forest biodiversity conservation , 2006 .

[21]  Anne Sofie Elberg Nielsen,et al.  Effects of preference heterogeneity among landowners on spatial conservation prioritization , 2017, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[22]  T. Snäll,et al.  Epiphyte metapopulation dynamics are explained by species traits, connectivity, and patch dynamics. , 2012, Ecology.

[23]  Ljusk Ola Eriksson,et al.  The Heureka Forestry Decision Support System: An Overview , 2011, Math. Comput. For. Nat. Resour. Sci..

[24]  A.P.E. van Oudenhoven,et al.  UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Ecosystem Services as a Contested Concept: A Synthesis of Critique and Counter-arguments Schötter, , 2014 .

[25]  Hannu Hökkä,et al.  Models for predicting stand development in MELA System , 2002 .

[26]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  R. Levins The strategy of model building in population biology , 1966 .

[28]  D. B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Functional Richness and Relative Resilience of Bird Communities in Regions with Different Land Use Intensities , 2007, Ecosystems.

[29]  N. Fahlvik,et al.  Evaluation of growth functions used in the Swedish Forest Planning System Heureka , 2014 .

[30]  J. Hynynen Self‐thinning models for even‐aged stands of Pinus sylvestris, Picea abies and Betula pendula , 1993 .

[31]  Peter A. Vanrolleghem,et al.  Uncertainty in the environmental modelling process - A framework and guidance , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[32]  Timo Pukkala,et al.  Species Interactions in the Dynamics of Even- and Uneven-Aged Boreal Forests , 2013 .

[33]  M. Troell,et al.  Applying resilience thinking to production ecosystems , 2014 .

[34]  P. Angelstam,et al.  Distribution of Deciduous Stands in Villages Located in Coniferous Forest Landscapes in Sweden , 2003, Ambio.

[35]  B. Elfving Natural mortality in thinning and fertilisation experiments with pine and spruce in Sweden , 2010 .

[36]  C. Bourque,et al.  Using JABOWA-3 for forest growth and yield predictions under diverse forest conditions of Nova Scotia, Canada , 2012 .

[37]  C. Margules,et al.  Indicators of Biodiversity for Ecologically Sustainable Forest Management , 2000 .

[38]  Danilo Russo,et al.  Modelling geographic distribution and detecting conservation gaps in Italy for the threatened beetle Rosalia alpina , 2013 .

[39]  José G. Borges,et al.  Integrating fire risk in stand management scheduling. An application to Maritime pine stands in Portugal , 2014, Ann. Oper. Res..

[40]  B. C. Ward,et al.  Using stochastic simulation to evaluate competing risks of wildfires and fuels management on an isolated forest carnivore , 2011, Landscape Ecology.

[41]  T. Snäll,et al.  Edge creation and tree dieback influence the patch‐tracking metapopulation dynamics of a red‐listed epiphytic bryophyte , 2011 .

[42]  I. Hanski,et al.  Extinction debt and species credit in boreal forests: modelling the consequences of different approaches to biodiversity conservation. , 2000 .

[43]  R. Noss Indicators for Monitoring Biodiversity: A Hierarchical Approach , 1990 .

[44]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Editorial: How Are We Doing? Reflections on the First Year of Ecosystems , 1999, Ecosystems.

[45]  R. Trubins,et al.  A landscape and policy perspective on forest conversion: Long-tailed tit (Aegithalos caudatus) and the allocation of deciduous forests in southern Sweden , 2011, European Journal of Forest Research.

[46]  Lars Edenius,et al.  Assessment of spatial functionality of old forest in Sweden as habitat for virtual species , 2006 .

[47]  N. Perrin,et al.  Viability and Management of an Endangered Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) Metapopulation in the Jura Mountains, Western Switzerland , 2006, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[48]  J. P. Kimmins,et al.  Modelling tools to assess the sustainability of forest management scenarios. , 2003 .

[49]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  Scattered trees are keystone structures – Implications for conservation , 2006 .

[50]  Rauli Svento,et al.  Voluntary agreements in protecting privately owned forests in Finland — To buy or to lease? , 2008 .

[51]  L. Gustafsson,et al.  Retention Forestry to Maintain Multifunctional Forests: A World Perspective , 2012 .

[52]  D. C. West,et al.  Forest Succession Models , 1980 .

[53]  A. Boardman,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice , 1996 .

[54]  J. R. Wallis,et al.  Some ecological consequences of a computer model of forest growth , 1972 .

[55]  T. Snäll,et al.  A model for non‐equilibrium metapopulation dynamics utilizing data on species occupancy, patch ages and landscape history , 2014 .

[56]  A. Felton,et al.  Relative contributions of set-asides and tree retention to the long-term availability of key forest biodiversity structures at the landscape scale. , 2015, Journal of environmental management.

[57]  Sauli Valkonen,et al.  Ingrowth, survival and height growth of small trees in uneven-aged Picea abies stands in southern Finland , 2014, Forest Ecosystems.

[58]  M. Turner,et al.  LANDSCAPE CHANGE AND HABITAT AVAILABILITY IN THE SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN HIGHLANDS AND OLYMPIC PENINSULA , 1999 .

[59]  G. Daily,et al.  Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity , 2012, Nature.

[60]  T. Regan,et al.  Modelling the impact of timber harvesting on a rare carnivorous land snail (Tasmaphena lamproides) in northwest Tasmania, Australia , 2001 .

[61]  T. Ranius,et al.  Effects of intensified forestry on the landscape-scale extinction risk of dead wood dependent species , 2011, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[62]  Hong S. He,et al.  Integrating Landscape and Metapopulation Modeling Approaches: Viability of the Sharp‐Tailed Grouse in a Dynamic Landscape , 2004 .

[63]  U. Soederberg Functions for forecasting of timber yields. Increment and form height for individual trees of native species in Sweden [tree growth models, individual tree growth, basal area increment, form height functions, long term forecasting, mortality] , 1986 .

[64]  K. Miettinen,et al.  Spatially dynamic forest management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns. , 2014, Journal of environmental management.

[65]  Lars Edenius,et al.  Utility of habitat suitability models as biodiversity assessment tools in forest management , 2006 .

[66]  Hubert Hasenauer,et al.  Scaling issues in forest ecosystem management and how to address them with models , 2013, European Journal of Forest Research.

[67]  S. Running,et al.  A general model of forest ecosystem processes for regional applications I. Hydrologic balance, canopy gas exchange and primary production processes , 1988 .

[68]  J. Matala,et al.  Regionally optimized forest management under changing climate , 2006 .

[69]  Volker Grimm,et al.  Ecological models supporting environmental decision making: a strategy for the future. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[70]  G. Orłowski,et al.  The importance of marginal habitats for the conservation of old trees in agricultural landscapes , 2007 .

[71]  Thomas Sterner,et al.  Discounting and relative prices , 2007 .

[72]  L. Fahrig How much habitat is enough , 2001 .

[73]  Renats Trubins,et al.  The Use of Decision Support Systems in Forest Management: Analysis of FORSYS Country Reports , 2016 .

[74]  G. Stenhouse,et al.  Can natural disturbance-based forestry rescue a declining population of grizzly bears? , 2008 .

[75]  C. Reeves Modern heuristic techniques for combinatorial problems , 1993 .

[76]  K. Eerikäinen,et al.  Long-term impacts of forest management on biomass supply and forest resource development: a scenario analysis for Finland , 2015, European Journal of Forest Research.

[77]  Håkan Olsson,et al.  Tree retention practices in boreal forests: what kind of future landscapes are we creating? , 2015 .

[78]  T. Spies,et al.  An Individual-Based Process Model to Simulate Landscape-Scale Forest Ecosystem Dynamics , 2012 .

[79]  R. Waring,et al.  A generalised model of forest productivity using simplified concepts of radiation-use efficiency, carbon balance and partitioning , 1997 .

[80]  G. Wilhere,et al.  Population Viability Analysis for Red-Cockaded Woodpeckers in the Georgia Piedmont , 1995 .

[81]  M. Fortin,et al.  Comparing different forest zoning options for landscape-scale management of the boreal forest: possible benefits of the TRIAD. , 2010 .

[82]  Ute Dreher,et al.  Evolution In Changing Environments Some Theoretical Explorations , 2016 .

[83]  R. Lidskog,et al.  Managing uncertainty: Forest professionals’ claim and epistemic authority in the face of societal and climate change , 2015 .

[84]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[85]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Ten iterative steps in development and evaluation of environmental models , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[86]  I. Hanski A Practical Model of Metapopulation Dynamics , 1994 .

[87]  T. Pakkala,et al.  Spatial ecology of the three-toed woodpecker in managed forest landscapes. , 2002 .

[88]  A. Juutinen,et al.  Cost-effective strategies to conserve boreal forest biodiversity and long-term landscape-level maintenance of habitats , 2011, European Journal of Forest Research.

[89]  Juho Matala,et al.  Modelling the response of tree growth to temperature and CO2 elevation as related to the fertility and current temperature sum of a site , 2006 .

[90]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Direct Measurement Versus Surrogate Indicator Species for Evaluating Environmental Change and Biodiversity Loss , 2010, Ecosystems.

[91]  Karin Öhman,et al.  Incorporating aspects of habitat fragmentation into long-term forest planning using mixed integer programming , 2008 .

[92]  Alan R. Ek,et al.  Process-based models for forest ecosystem management: current state of the art and challenges for practical implementation. , 2000, Tree physiology.

[93]  Christian Gollier,et al.  Ecological discounting , 2010, J. Econ. Theory.

[94]  A. Felton,et al.  Long-term landscape scale effects of bioenergy extraction on dead wood-dependent species , 2016 .

[95]  A. Juutinen,et al.  Conservation Contracts for Forest Biodiversity: Theory and Experience from Finland , 2010, Forest Science.

[96]  Robert G. Wagner,et al.  Process versus empirical models: which approach for forest ecosystem management? , 1996 .

[97]  J. S. Kotiaho,et al.  Optimal conservation resource allocation under variable economic and ecological time discounting rates in boreal forest. , 2016, Journal of environmental management.

[98]  Jürgen Bauhus,et al.  Silvicultural alternatives to conventional even-aged forest management - what limits global adoption? , 2015, Forest Ecosystems.

[99]  Jay Odenbaugh,et al.  Complex Systems, Trade‐Offs, and Theoretical Population Biology: Richard Levin's “Strategy of Model Building in Population Biology” Revisited , 2003, Philosophy of Science.

[100]  Verena M. Trenkel,et al.  Hazard warning: model misuse ahead , 2014 .

[101]  B. Muys,et al.  Jack-of-all-trades effects drive biodiversity–ecosystem multifunctionality relationships in European forests , 2016, Nature Communications.

[102]  D. Mladenoff LANDIS and forest landscape models , 2004 .

[103]  W. Walker,et al.  Defining Uncertainty: A Conceptual Basis for Uncertainty Management in Model-Based Decision Support , 2003 .

[104]  Anssi Ahtikoski,et al.  Applying the MOTTI simulator to analyse the effects of alternative management schedules on timber and non-timber production , 2005 .

[105]  G. Thor,et al.  The relative importance of stand and dead wood types for wood-dependent lichens in managed boreal forests , 2016 .

[106]  國合會系統管理者 Global Forest Resources Assessment , 2016 .

[107]  A. Juutinen,et al.  Cost-efficient strategies to preserve dead wood-dependent species in a managed forest landscape , 2016 .

[108]  Aurore Lassauce,et al.  Deadwood as a surrogate for forest biodiversity: Meta-analysis of correlations between deadwood volume and species richness of saproxylic organisms , 2011 .

[109]  K. Eerikäinen,et al.  Models for the regeneration establishment and the development of established seedlings in uneven-aged, Norway spruce dominated forest stands of southern Finland , 2007 .

[110]  Jean-Michel Roberge,et al.  Usefulness of the Umbrella Species Concept as a Conservation Tool , 2004 .

[111]  J. Gamarra,et al.  Metapopulation Ecology , 2007 .

[112]  H. Pretzscha,et al.  The single tree-based stand simulator SILVA : construction , application and evaluation , 2002 .

[113]  R. Levins Evolution in Changing Environments: Some Theoretical Explorations. (MPB-2) , 1968 .

[114]  T. Lind,et al.  Accounting for a Diverse Forest Ownership Structure in Projections of Forest Sustainability Indicators , 2015 .

[115]  D. Pannell,et al.  Economics and the Future: Time and Discounting in Private and Public Decision Making , 2006 .

[116]  Phoebe Koundouri,et al.  Recent advances in discounting: Implications for forest economics , 2007 .

[117]  R. A. Monserud,et al.  Control of plot edge bias in forest stand growth simulation models , 1977 .