Forums for electronic government scholars: Insights from a 2012/2013 study

Abstract Once an academic study domain has accumulated a certain volume of domain-specific knowledge, a number of outlets emerge as preferred outlets for publication. Electronic government research (EGR) is no exception. After developing for some 15 years from its early beginnings in the late 1990s, this multi-disciplinary academic domain appears to have reached exactly this point. With an active researcher community numbering in the hundreds worldwide and a body of over 5500 peer-reviewed manuscripts and books in the English language alone, EGR has grown past its infancy into a discernible and reputable academic endeavor in its own right. While the Electronic Government Reference Library (EGRL) provides a comprehensive account of the peer-reviewed EGR literature, the preferences of publication outlets had not been studied. This study closes this gap, and it provides clues for assessing the reputation and quality of scholarly work in EGR, which is highly relevant for decisions in tenure and promotion cases.

[1]  Hans Jochen Scholl,et al.  Discipline or Interdisciplinary Study Domain? Challenges and Promises in Electronic Government Research , 2008, Digital Government.

[2]  Mark A. Fuller,et al.  Research Standards for Promotion and Tenure in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[3]  James C. Garand An Alternative Interpretation of Recent Political Science Journal Evaluations , 1990, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[4]  F D Wolinsky,et al.  Rating journals in health care administration. The use of bibliometric measures. , 1993, Medical care.

[5]  Hans Jochen Scholl,et al.  Profiling the EG Research Community and Its Core , 2009, EGOV.

[6]  Bill C. Hardgrave,et al.  Forums for management information systems scholars , 1995, CACM.

[7]  Hans J. Scholl Electronic Government: Introduction to the Domain , 2015 .

[8]  Kevin Campbell,et al.  Ranking of United Kingdom Law Journals: An Analysis of the Research Assessment Exercise 2001 Submissions and Results , 2006 .

[9]  Ian C. MacMillan,et al.  The emerging forum for business policy scholars , 1991 .

[10]  Bill C. Hardgrave,et al.  Forums for MIS scholars , 1997, CACM.

[11]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  Comparative citation rankings of authors in monographic and journal literature: a study of sociology , 1997, J. Documentation.

[12]  Josephine E. Olson,et al.  Top-25-Business-School Professors Rate Journals in Operations Management and Related Fields , 2005, Interfaces.

[13]  Ray Over Journal ranking by citation analysis: Some inconsistencies. , 1978 .

[14]  Peter Tarasewich,et al.  Global perceptions of journals publishing e-commerce research , 2002, CACM.