Critical review of the use and scientific basis of forensic gait analysis

Abstract This review summarizes the scientific basis of forensic gait analysis and evaluates its use in the Netherlands, United Kingdom and Denmark, following recent critique on the admission of gait evidence in Canada. A useful forensic feature is (1) measurable, (2) consistent within and (3) different between individuals. Reviewing the academic literature, this article found that (1) forensic gait features can be quantified or observed from surveillance video, but research into accuracy, validity and reliability of these methods is needed; (2) gait is variable within individuals under differing and constant circumstances, with speed having major influence; (3) the discriminative strength of gait features needs more research, although clearly variation exists between individuals. Nevertheless, forensic gait analysis has contributed to several criminal trials in Europe in the past 15 years. The admission of gait evidence differs between courts. The methods are mainly observer-based: multiple gait analysts (independently) assess gait features on video footage of a perpetrator and suspect. Using gait feature databases, likelihood ratios of the hypotheses that the observed individuals have the same or another identity can be calculated. Automated gait recognition algorithms calculate a difference measure between video clips, which is compared with a threshold value derived from a video gait recognition database to indicate likelihood. However, only partly automated algorithms have been used in practice. We argue that the scientific basis of forensic gait analysis is limited. However, gait feature databases enable its use in court for supportive evidence with relatively low evidential value. The recommendations made in this review are (1) to expand knowledge on inter- and intra-subject gait variabilities, discriminative strength and interdependency of gait features, method accuracies, gait feature databases and likelihood ratio estimations; (2) to compare automated and observer-based gait recognition methods; to design (3) an international standard method with known validity, reliability and proficiency tests for analysts; (4) an international standard gait feature data collection method resulting in database(s); (5) (inter)national guidelines for the admission of gait evidence in court; and (6) to decrease the risk for cognitive and contextual bias in forensic gait analysis. This is expected to improve admission of gait evidence in court and judgment of its evidential value. Several ongoing research projects focus on parts of these recommendations.

[1]  G. Edmond,et al.  Contextual bias and cross-contamination in the forensic sciences: the corrosive implications for investigations, plea bargains, trials and appeals , 2015 .

[2]  Mao-Jiun J. Wang,et al.  The change of gait parameters during walking at different percentage of preferred walking speed for healthy adults aged 20-60 years. , 2010, Gait & posture.

[3]  Ivan Birch,et al.  Aiding the interpretation of forensic gait analysis: Development of a features of gait database. , 2017, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[4]  Louis Raymond,et al.  The identification of individuals by observational gait analysis using closed circuit television footage. , 2013, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[5]  O. Köster,et al.  The tell-tale accent: Identification of regionally marked speech in German telephone conversations by forensic phoneticians , 2012 .

[6]  R.B. Davis,et al.  Clinical gait analysis , 1988, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[7]  H. K. Ramakrishnan,et al.  Repeatability of kinematic, kinetic, and electromyographic data in normal adult gait , 1989, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[8]  M. Samson,et al.  Differences in gait parameters at a preferred walking speed in healthy subjects due to age, height and body weight , 2001, Aging.

[9]  M. Page,et al.  Uniqueness in the forensic identification sciences--fact or fiction? , 2011, Forensic science international.

[10]  Christopher Kirtley,et al.  Clinical Gait Analysis: Theory and Practice , 2006 .

[11]  Wesley Vernon,et al.  The effect of frame rate on the ability of experienced gait analysts to identify characteristics of gait from closed circuit television footage. , 2014, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[12]  George E Gorton,et al.  Assessment of the kinematic variability among 12 motion analysis laboratories. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[13]  E. Simonsen,et al.  Gait Recognition Using Joint Moments, Joint Angles, and Segment Angles , 2010 .

[14]  Zeno J. Geradts,et al.  Use of gait parameters of persons in video surveillance systems , 2002, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[15]  T. Oberg,et al.  Basic gait parameters: reference data for normal subjects, 10-79 years of age. , 1993, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[16]  Imed Bouchrika,et al.  On Using Gait in Forensic Biometrics , 2011, Journal of forensic sciences.

[17]  Fariza Hanis Abdul Razak,et al.  Gait-Based Emotion Detection of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Preliminary Investigation☆ , 2015 .

[18]  Gentiane Venture,et al.  Recognizing Emotions Conveyed by Human Gait , 2014, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[19]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  Recognizing people from their movement. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  Richard D Sanders,et al.  Gait and its assessment in psychiatry. , 2010, Psychiatry (Edgmont (Pa. : Township)).

[21]  R. Santos-Rocha,et al.  Biomechanics of Gait during Pregnancy , 2014, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[22]  R. Iqbal,et al.  Human Gait with Reference to Age, Gender and Impact of Load: A Review , 2016 .

[23]  H. Graham,et al.  The gait standard deviation, a single measure of kinematic variability. , 2016, Gait & posture.

[24]  Bir Bhanu,et al.  Individual recognition using gait energy image , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[25]  T. Beardsworth,et al.  The ability to recognize oneself from a video recording of one’s movements without seeing one’s body , 1981 .

[26]  J. Wilken,et al.  Reliability and Minimal Detectible Change values for gait kinematics and kinetics in healthy adults. , 2012, Gait & posture.

[27]  W. Vernon,et al.  Terminology and forensic gait analysis. , 2015, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[28]  J. Cutting,et al.  Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues , 1977 .

[29]  Chang-Tsun Li,et al.  On Reducing the Effect of Covariate Factors in Gait Recognition: A Classifier Ensemble Method , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[30]  C Kirtley,et al.  Influence of walking speed on gait parameters. , 1985, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[31]  Ivo Alberink,et al.  Body Height Measurements in Images , 2009, Journal of forensic sciences.

[32]  Davrondzhon Gafurov,et al.  A Survey of Biometric Gait Recognition: Approaches, Security and Challenges , 2007 .

[33]  I. Birch,et al.  The identification of emotions from gait. , 2016, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[34]  M. Morris,et al.  The reliability of three-dimensional kinematic gait measurements: a systematic review. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[35]  Barry K. Logan,et al.  Drugs and Human Performance Fact Sheets , 2014 .

[36]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Encyclopedia of Biometrics , 2015, Springer US.

[37]  Sudeep Sarkar,et al.  The humanID gait challenge problem: data sets, performance, and analysis , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[38]  Mark S. Nixon,et al.  Towards automated visual surveillance using gait for identity recognition and tracking across multiple non-intersecting cameras , 2014, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[39]  C. Champod,et al.  ENFSI guIdElINE For EvaluatIvE rEportINg IN ForENSIc ScIENcE Strengthening the Evaluation of Forensic Results across Europe ( STEOFRAE , 2015 .

[40]  Sung Min Son,et al.  Changes of kinematic parameters of lower extremities with gait speed: a 3D motion analysis study , 2015, Journal of physical therapy science.

[41]  Yasushi Makihara,et al.  Gait-based person-verification system for forensics , 2012, 2012 IEEE Fifth International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS).

[42]  Brett R Fajen,et al.  The biomechanics of walking shape the use of visual information during locomotion over complex terrain. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[43]  Kiyoshi Tanaka,et al.  On the effectiveness of feature selection methods for gait classification under different covariate factors , 2017, Appl. Soft Comput..

[44]  Wesley Vernon,et al.  The development of a tool for assessing the quality of closed circuit camera footage for use in forensic gait analysis. , 2013, Journal of forensic and legal medicine.

[45]  Vladimír Sládek,et al.  Body size and lower limb posture during walking in humans , 2017, PloS one.

[46]  Tine Alkjær,et al.  Variability and Similarity of Gait as Evaluated by Joint Angles: Implications for Forensic Gait Analysis , 2014, Journal of forensic sciences.

[47]  Rita M. Kiss,et al.  The influence of walking speed on gait parameters in healthy people and in patients with osteoarthritis , 2006, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[48]  N. Stergiou,et al.  The Effect of Walking Speed on Gait Variability in Healthy Young, Middle-aged and Elderly Individuals. , 2015, Journal of physical activity, nutrition and rehabilitation.

[49]  Tine Alkjær,et al.  Influence of Velocity on Variability in Gait Kinematics: Implications for Recognition in Forensic Science , 2014, Journal of forensic sciences.

[50]  K. An,et al.  Repeated measures of adult normal walking using a video tracking system 1 Presented in part at the 1 , 1997 .

[51]  Niels Lynnerup,et al.  Gait as evidence , 2014, IET Biom..

[52]  Imed Bouchrika,et al.  Evidence Evaluation of Gait Biometrics for Forensic Investigation , 2017 .

[53]  M.S. Nixon,et al.  Front-view Gait Recognition , 2008, 2008 IEEE Second International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems.

[54]  Andrew Bateman,et al.  Observational gait assessment tools in paediatrics--a systematic review. , 2014, Gait & posture.

[55]  Wesley Vernon,et al.  Forensic Podiatry: Principles and Methods , 2011 .

[56]  Mark S. Nixon,et al.  On use of biometrics in forensics: Gait and ear , 2010, 2010 18th European Signal Processing Conference.

[57]  D. Winter Kinematic and kinetic patterns in human gait: Variability and compensating effects , 1984 .

[58]  Mark S. Nixon,et al.  Automatic Gait Recognition by Symmetry Analysis , 2001, AVBPA.

[59]  Karim Faez,et al.  Human Identification Based on Gait , 2008 .

[60]  G. Johansson Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[61]  W. Vernon,et al.  A review of the historical use and criticisms of gait analysis evidence. , 2018, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.