From behaviour to design: implications for artifact ecologies as shared spaces for design activities

ABSTRACT Researchers are increasingly exploring collaborative behaviour in complex socio-technical systems through in-the-wild investigations to understand, evaluate and technology. The space configuration and tools available in such activities are crucial for the successful collaboration of a group. This work offers an in-the-wild examination of six groups tackling a design project working in an artifact ecology, a space rich in physical and digital artifacts. We delve into the physical and digital space of each of the groups during a 3-month duration to obtain a rich understanding of their collaborative activities. The aim of this work is two-fold; provide summative narrations of each one of the five models of DiCoT to extract design implications and evaluate the usefulness of DiCoT as an analytical tool for understanding artifact ecologies. Through a rich dataset – interviews, focus groups, reflective diaries, online interactions, and video recordings – we construct a summative description of the group behaviour based on the methodological framework of Distributed Cognition for Teamwork. Drawing on these narrations, we provide design implications on the use of an artifact ecology as a shared space for design activities. Both outcomes are then used to evaluate the usefulness of DiCoT as an analytical tool for artifact implications.

[1]  Jochen Rick.  Towards a classroom ecology of devices: interfaces for collaborative scripts , 2009 .

[2]  Steve Benford,et al.  Shared spaces: transportation, artificiality, and spatiality , 1996, CSCW '96.

[3]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Contextual design , 1997, INTR.

[4]  Andreas Butz,et al.  Organizational Design , 2014, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[5]  Clemens Nylandsted Klokmose,et al.  The Human–Artifact Model: An Activity Theoretical Approach to Artifact Ecologies , 2011, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[6]  Monika Richter,et al.  Cognition In The Wild , 2016 .

[7]  Grigori Melnik,et al.  Information Flow within a Dispersed Agile Team: A Distributed Cognition Perspective , 2012, XP.

[8]  John Karat,et al.  Evolving the scope of user-centered design , 1997, CACM.

[9]  Clemens Nylandsted Klokmose,et al.  Dynamics in artifact ecologies , 2012, NordiCHI.

[10]  Karel Vredenburg,et al.  A survey of user-centered design practice , 2002, CHI.

[11]  Panayiotis Zaphiris,et al.  Enacting artifact-based activities for social technologies in language learning using a design-based research approach , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[12]  Eva Hornecker,et al.  Urban HCI: spatial aspects in the design of shared encounters for media facades , 2012, CHI.

[13]  Michaela Borg,et al.  Learning spaces and pedagogy: Towards the development of a shared understanding , 2018 .

[14]  Pascal Béguin,et al.  Designing for Instrument-Mediated Activity , 2000, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Gerard Torenvliet,et al.  Applying Contextual Design to Multiple Teams in Emergency Management , 2013, HCI.

[16]  Johannes Schöning,et al.  Cross-Surface: Workshop on Interacting with Multi-Device Ecologies in the Wild , 2015, ITS.

[17]  Markus F. Peschl,et al.  Designing and Enabling Spaces for collaborative knowledge creation and innovation: From managing to enabling innovation as socio-epistemological technology , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[18]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Exploring medical device design and use through layers of Distributed Cognition: How a glucometer is coupled with its context , 2015, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[19]  Orit Shaer,et al.  A collaborative environment for engaging novices in scientific inquiry , 2012, ITS '12.

[20]  Clarence A. Ellis,et al.  Groupware: some issues and experiences , 1991, CACM.

[21]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue of “The Turn to The Wild” , 2013, TCHI.

[22]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  HCI Theory: Classical, Modern, and Contemporary , 2012, HCI Theory.

[23]  J. Reeve.  How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. , 2013 .

[24]  Ann Blandford,et al.  DiCoT Modeling: From Analysis to Design , 2010 .

[25]  Davinia Hernández Leo,et al.  Supporting collaborative design activity in a multi-user digital design ecology , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[26]  Tom Gross,et al.  Supporting Effortless Coordination: 25 Years of Awareness Research , 2013, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[27]  Clifton Forlines,et al.  MultiSpace: enabling electronic document micro-mobility in table-centric, multi-device environments , 2006, First IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human-Computer Systems (TABLETOP '06).

[28]  Sea Ling,et al.  Analyzing Observable Behaviours of Device Ecology Workflows , 2004, ICEIS.

[29]  Sanna Järvelä,et al.  Enhancing socially shared regulation in collaborative learning groups: designing for CSCL regulation tools , 2014, Educational Technology Research and Development.

[30]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  Toward a framework for ecologies of artifacts: how are digital artifacts interconnected within a personal life? , 2008, NordiCHI.

[31]  Paolo Tell,et al.  ActivitySpace: Managing Device Ecologies in an Activity-Centric Configuration Space , 2014, ITS '14.

[32]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Contextual design , 1997, INTR.

[33]  Hao Wang,et al.  Connecting people through physical resources in an office environment , 2011, UbiComp '11.

[34]  BlandfordAnn,et al.  Exploring medical device design and use through layers of Distributed Cognition , 2015 .

[35]  Ann Blandford,et al.  DiCoT: A Methodology for Applying Distributed Cognition to the Design of Teamworking Systems , 2005, DSV-IS.

[36]  Rini van Solingen,et al.  Collaboration Spaces for Virtual Software Teams , 2014, IEEE Software.

[37]  Sara Jones,et al.  Design tribes and information spaces for creative conversations , 2010 .

[38]  Anna Vogel,et al.  Office Ergonomics Driven by Contextual Design , 2015 .

[39]  Toni Robertson,et al.  Physical space and information space: studies of collaboration in distributed multi-disciplinary medical team meetings , 2011, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[40]  Judy Kay,et al.  Multi-touch technology in a higher-education classroom: lessons in-the-wild , 2014, OZCHI.

[41]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Let's get physical: The learning benefits of interacting in digitally augmented physical spaces , 2004, Comput. Educ..

[42]  James D. Hollan,et al.  Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research , 2000, TCHI.

[43]  Helen Sharp,et al.  The role of story cards and the wall in XP teams: a distributed cognition perspective , 2006, AGILE 2006 (AGILE'06).

[44]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Is the Writing on the Wall for Tabletops? , 2009, INTERACT.

[45]  Selma Sabanovic,et al.  Weiser's dream in the Korean home: collaborative study of domestic roles, relationships, and ideal technologies , 2013, UbiComp.

[46]  Johannes Schöning,et al.  Cross-Surface: Challenges and Opportunities for 'bring your own device' in the wild , 2016, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[47]  Panayiotis Zaphiris,et al.  Specifying the dynamics of social technologies as social microworlds , 2015, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[48]  George Mangalaraj,et al.  Distributed Cognition in Software Design: An Experimental Investigation of the Role of Design Patterns and Collaboration , 2014, MIS Q..

[49]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  WeSearch: supporting collaborative search and sensemaking on a tabletop display , 2010, CSCW '10.

[50]  R. Benjamin Shapiro,et al.  Using Distributed Cognition Theory to Analyze Collaborative Computer Science Learning , 2015, ICER.

[51]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  The conceptual framing, design and evaluation of device ecologies for collaborative activities , 2012, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[52]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  Beyond Mouse and Keyboard: Expanding Design Considerations for Information Visualization Interactions , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[53]  Marek Hatala,et al.  Sharing engineering design knowledge in a distributed environment , 2000, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[54]  Andrew D. Miller,et al.  The place for ubiquitous computing in schools: lessons learned from a school-based intervention for youth physical activity , 2011, UbiComp '11.

[55]  Yannis A. Dimitriadis,et al.  Scripted vs. free CS collaboration: alternatives and paths for adaptable and flexible CS scripted collaboration , 2009, CSCL.

[56]  Panayiotis Zaphiris,et al.  Understanding collaborative learning activities in an information ecology: A distributed cognition account , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..