A balance control model predicts how vestibular loss subjects benefit from a vibrotactile balance prosthesis

A balance control model was applied to interpret how subjects with a severe vestibular loss (VL) used vibrotactile information from a balance prosthesis to enhance balance control. Experimental data were from 5 VL subjects standing with eyes closed and responding to continuous pseudorandom surface tilts of the stance platform. Results showed that vibrotactile feedback information reduced sway at frequencies below ∼0.6 Hz, but vibrotactile feedback was less effective in reducing sway as stimulus amplitude increased. This experimental pattern was accurately predicted by the model, which was based on time-delayed sensory feedback control. The model predicted that changes to the vibrotactor activation scheme could improve performance of the prosthesis and demonstrated that further improvements might be possible if motor learning, acquired by practice and training, could increase VL subjects' reliance on the prosthesis.

[1]  R.J. Peterka,et al.  Simplifying the complexities of maintaining balance , 2003, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[2]  Rik Pintelon,et al.  System Identification: A Frequency Domain Approach , 2012 .

[3]  E Kentala,et al.  Control of sway using vibrotactile feedback of body tilt in patients with moderate and severe postural control deficits. , 2005, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[4]  Conrad Wall,et al.  Balance prostheses for postural control. , 2003, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.

[5]  R. Peterka Sensorimotor integration in human postural control. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  E. Finkelstein,et al.  The costs of fatal and non-fatal falls among older adults , 2006, Injury Prevention.

[7]  Conrad Wall,et al.  Balance prosthesis based on micromechanical sensors using vibrotactile feedback of tilt , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  F. Horak,et al.  Effects of practicing tandem gait with and without vibrotactile biofeedback in subjects with unilateral vestibular loss. , 2008, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[9]  Conrad Wall,et al.  Determining the effectiveness of a vibrotactile balance prosthesis. , 2006, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[10]  A. Goodworth,et al.  Influence of Feedback Parameters on Performance of a Vibrotactile Balance Prosthesis , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[11]  P. B. Schmidt,et al.  Vibrotactile display coding for a balance prosthesis , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[12]  Michael C Schubert,et al.  Disorders of balance and vestibular function in US adults: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001-2004. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[13]  B J Hess,et al.  Computation of Inertial Motion: Neural Strategies to Resolve Ambiguous Otolith Information , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  C. Wall,et al.  Vibrotactile tilt feedback improves dynamic gait index: a fall risk indicator in older adults. , 2009, Gait & posture.