Pro Free Will Priming Enhances “Risk-Taking” Behavior in the Iowa Gambling Task, but Not in the Balloon Analogue Risk Task: Two Independent Priming Studies

Studies indicated that people behave less responsibly after exposure to information containing deterministic statements as compared to free will statements or neutral statements. Thus, deterministic primes should lead to enhanced risk-taking behavior. We tested this prediction in two studies with healthy participants. In experiment 1, we tested 144 students (24 men) in the laboratory using the Iowa Gambling Task. In experiment 2, we tested 274 participants (104 men) online using the Balloon Analogue Risk Task. In the Iowa Gambling Task, the free will priming condition resulted in more risky decisions than both the deterministic and neutral priming conditions. We observed no priming effects on risk-taking behavior in the Balloon Analogue Risk Task. To explain these unpredicted findings, we consider the somatic marker hypothesis, a gain frequency approach as well as attention to gains and / or inattention to losses. In addition, we highlight the necessity to consider both pro free will and deterministic priming conditions in future studies. Importantly, our and previous results indicate that the effects of pro free will and deterministic priming do not oppose each other on a frequently assumed continuum.

[1]  Christiane,et al.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. , 2004, Journal international de bioethique = International journal of bioethics.

[2]  Antonio Damasio,et al.  The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision , 2005, Games Econ. Behav..

[3]  Darrell A. Worthy,et al.  Heterogeneity of strategy use in the Iowa gambling task: A comparison of win-stay/lose-shift and reinforcement learning models , 2013, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  Sgt,et al.  Gain-loss frequency and final outcome in the Soochow Gambling Task : A Reassessment . , 2014 .

[5]  Steven W Anderson,et al.  Decision-making deficits, linked to a dysfunctional ventromedial prefrontal cortex, revealed in alcohol and stimulant abusers , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  Katherine M. White,et al.  Internet versus paper-and-pencil survey methods in psychological experiments : equivalence testing of participant responses to health-related messages , 2009 .

[7]  T. Robbins,et al.  Decision-making processes following damage to the prefrontal cortex. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  W. van den Brink,et al.  Psychophysiological determinants and concomitants of deficient decision making in pathological gamblers. , 2006, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[9]  David Ansic,et al.  Gender differences in risk behaviour in financial decision-making: An experimental analysis. , 1997 .

[10]  Kirsten Labudda,et al.  Decision-making impairments in patients with pathological gambling , 2005, Psychiatry Research.

[11]  Richard J. Tunney,et al.  Some decks are better than others: The effect of reinforcer type and task instructions on learning in the Iowa Gambling Task , 2006, Brain and Cognition.

[12]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  Publication Bias against Null Results , 1997 .

[13]  M. Brass,et al.  Inducing Disbelief in Free Will Alters Brain Correlates of Preconscious Motor Preparation , 2011, Psychological science.

[14]  M. Muraven,et al.  Self-Control Depletion Leads to Increased Risk Taking , 2010 .

[15]  E. Weber,et al.  A Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT) Scale for Adult Populations , 2006, Judgment and Decision Making.

[16]  R. Rakos,et al.  Belief in Free Will: Measurement and Conceptualization Innovations , 2008 .

[17]  S. Eckstein Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. , 2001, European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine.

[18]  Stephen Richard Billett,et al.  Intuitive expertise: Theories and empirical evidence , 2013 .

[19]  Will M Aklin,et al.  Evaluation of behavioral measures of risk taking propensity with inner city adolescents. , 2005, Behaviour research and therapy.

[20]  K. Vohs,et al.  The Hazards of Claiming to Have Solved the Hard Problem of Free Will , 2008 .

[21]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[22]  D. Paulhus,et al.  The FAD–Plus: Measuring Lay Beliefs Regarding Free Will and Related Constructs , 2011, Journal of personality assessment.

[23]  Daniel M Wegner,et al.  Précis of The illusion of conscious will , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[24]  Paul D. Ellis,et al.  The essential guide to effect sizes : statistical power, meta-analysis, and the interpretation of research results , 2010 .

[25]  Tara L. White,et al.  Test-retest characteristics of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). , 2008, Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology.

[26]  John Baer,et al.  Are We Free? , 2008 .

[27]  E. Weber,et al.  Affective and deliberative processes in risky choice: age differences in risk taking in the Columbia Card Task. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  K. Vohs,et al.  Measuring and manipulating beliefs and behaviors associated with free will , 2014 .

[29]  J. Hsieh,et al.  Immediate gain is long-term loss: Are there foresighted decision makers in the Iowa Gambling Task? , 2008, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[30]  K. Vohs,et al.  Free will in consumer behavior: Self-control, ego depletion, and choice , 2008 .

[31]  Gregory L. Stuart,et al.  Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[32]  R. Hertwig,et al.  The description–experience gap in risky choice , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  P. Sham,et al.  Behavioral and Brain Functions , 2008 .

[34]  Giuseppe Sartori,et al.  Reducing self-control by weakening belief in free will , 2012, Consciousness and Cognition.

[35]  Pello Huizi,et al.  Are we free? Psychology and Free Will (John Baer, James C. Kaufman & Roy F. Baumeister (arg.)) , 2012 .

[36]  Shane T. Mueller,et al.  The Psychology Experiment Building Language (PEBL) and PEBL Test Battery , 2014, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[37]  Wolzt,et al.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. , 2003, The Journal of the American College of Dentists.

[38]  L. M. M.-T. Theory of Probability , 1929, Nature.

[39]  R. Nickerson,et al.  Null hypothesis significance testing: a review of an old and continuing controversy. , 2000, Psychological methods.

[40]  R. Kane,et al.  Four Views on Free Will , 2007 .

[41]  H. Damasio,et al.  The Iowa Gambling Task and the somatic marker hypothesis: some questions and answers , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[42]  P. Shields,et al.  Publication bias is a scientific problem with adverse ethical outcomes: the case for a section for null results. , 2000, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[43]  E. Velten A laboratory task for induction of mood states. , 1968, Behaviour research and therapy.

[44]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Prosocial Benefits of Feeling Free: Disbelief in Free Will Increases Aggression and Reduces Helpfulness , 2009, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[45]  A. Damasio,et al.  Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex , 1994, Cognition.

[46]  A. Damasio,et al.  Deciding Advantageously Before Knowing the Advantageous Strategy , 1997, Science.

[47]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Free Will in Scientific Psychology , 2008, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[48]  Sean A. Spence,et al.  Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain , 1995 .

[49]  D. Fum,et al.  Dissociable processes underlying decisions in the Iowa Gambling Task: a new integrative framework , 2009, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[50]  Stacey B. Daughters,et al.  Risk-taking propensity and risky sexual behavior of individuals in residential substance use treatment. , 2004, Addictive behaviors.

[51]  D. Veltman,et al.  Imaging studies in pathological gambling: similarities and differences with alcohol dependence , 2011 .

[52]  Marcel Brass,et al.  When errors do not matter: Weakening belief in intentional control impairs cognitive reaction to errors , 2013, Cognition.

[53]  J. Hsieh,et al.  Is deck B a disadvantageous deck in the Iowa Gambling Task? , 2007, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[54]  Kathleen D. Vohs,et al.  The Value of Believing in Free Will , 2008, Psychological science.

[55]  Hanli Liu,et al.  Comparison of neural correlates of risk decision making between genders: An exploratory fNIRS study of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) , 2012, NeuroImage.

[56]  Yao-Chu Chiu,et al.  Is deck C an advantageous deck in the Iowa Gambling Task? , 2007, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[57]  Roy F. Baumeister,et al.  Determined to conform: Disbelief in free will increases conformity , 2013 .

[58]  William D. Schafer,et al.  Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. , 1999 .

[59]  Keith E Stanovich,et al.  Decision-making and cognitive abilities: A review of associations between Iowa Gambling Task performance, executive functions, and intelligence. , 2010, Clinical psychology review.