The choice of on- or off-pump coronary bypass grafting--a surgeon's dilemma.

BACKGROUND Off-pump coronary bypass grafting (OPCAB) is a routine method of heart revascularization. This study was designed to compare the results of OPCAB and ONCAB performed by a single surgeon at our institution over a 3-year period. METHODS The study enrolled 345 patients undergoing elective myocardial revascularization procedures, of which 173 (50.1%) were OPCAB and 172 (49.9 %) were ONCAB. The postoperative outcomes of both groups were analyzed, retrospectively. RESULTS The mean number of grafts was significantly lower in the OPCAB group (2.9) than in the ONCAB group (3.7). There were no postoperative myocardial infarctions or hospital deaths in any of the patients. The postoperative total blood loss was significantly higher in the ONCAB group. The frequencies of postoperative confused states, strokes, postoperative transfusions, reoperations for bleeding, and atrial fibrillation, and the durations of intubation, ICU stay, and hospital stay did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS The OPCAB procedures are safe and provide good clinical outcomes, similar to those of ONCAB operations. The outcomes of this study favor neither of the compared techniques.

[1]  T. Vassiliades,et al.  Off-pump coronary bypass provides reduced mortality and morbidity and equivalent 10-year survival. , 2008, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[2]  M. Mack,et al.  Coronary Artery Revascularization (CARE) registry: an observational study of on-pump and off-pump coronary artery revascularization. , 2007, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[3]  R. Hájek,et al.  Sequential bypass grafting on the beating heart: blood flow characteristics. , 2006, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[4]  M. Amrani,et al.  Effect of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery on clinical, angiographic, neurocognitive, and quality of life outcomes: randomised controlled trial , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  G. Watanabe,et al.  Early Outcome of a Randomized Comparison of Off-Pump and On-Pump Multiple Arterial Coronary Revascularization , 2005, Circulation.

[6]  M. Mack,et al.  Comparing on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: numerous studies but few conclusions: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association council on cardiovascular surgery and anesthesia in collaboration with the interdisciplinary working group on quality of care and outcomes , 2005, Circulation.

[7]  E. Hannan,et al.  A comparison of short- and long-term outcomes after off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery with sternotomy. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  W. Weintraub,et al.  Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting provides complete revascularization with reduced myocardial injury, transfusion requirements, and length of stay: a prospective randomized comparison of two hundred unselected patients undergoing off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting. , 2003, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[9]  T. Vassiliades,et al.  ff-Pump Coronary Bypass Provides Reduced ortality and Morbidity and Equivalent 0-Year Survival , 2008 .