How Social Capital Among Information Technology and Business Units Drives Operational Alignment and IT Business Value

It is widely acknowledged that information technology (IT) and business resources need to be well aligned to achieve organizational goals. Yet, year after year, chief information officers still name business-IT alignment a key challenge for IT executives. While alignment research has matured, we still lack a sound theoretical foundation for alignment. Transcending the predominantly strategic executive-level focus, we develop a model of "operational alignment" and IT business value that combines a social perspective of IT and business linkage with a view of interaction between business and IT at nonstrategic levels, such as in daily business operations involving regular staff. Drawing on social capital theory to explain how alignment affects organizational performance, we examine why common suggestions such as "communicate more" are insufficient to strengthen alignment and disclose how social capital between IT and business units drives alignment and ultimately IT business value. Empirical data from 136 firms confirms the profound impact of operational business-IT alignment, composed of social capital and business understanding of IT, on IT flexibility, IT utilization, and organizational performance. The results show that social capital theory is a useful theoretical foundation for understanding how business IT alignment works. The findings suggest that operational alignment is at least as important as strategic alignment for IT service quality; that managers need to focus on operational aspects of alignment beyond communication by fostering knowledge, trust, and respect; and that IT utilization and flexibility are appropriate intermediate goals for business-IT alignment governance.

[1]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Strategic Alignment Between Business and Information Technology: A Knowledge-Based View of Behaviors, Outcome, and Consequences , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Varun Grover,et al.  Leveraging Information Technology Infrastructure to Facilitate a Firm's Customer Agility and Competitive Activity: An Empirical Investigation , 2012, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Applying Adaptive Structuration Theory to Investigate the Process of Group Support Systems Use , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Integrating Knowledge in Groups: How Formal Interventions Enable Flexibility , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[6]  Ganesh D. Bhatt Managing Information Systems Competence for the Competitive Advantage: An Empirical Analysis , 2003, ICIS.

[7]  Daniel Beimborn,et al.  The effect of social network structures at the business/IT interface on IT application change effectiveness , 2014, J. Inf. Technol..

[8]  Terry Anthony Byrd,et al.  An exploratory examination of the relationship between flexible IT infrastructure and competitive advantage , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[9]  Jochen Franke,et al.  The Role of Information Technology Business Alignment in Value Creation: A Multiple Case Study among German Banks , 2005, ICIS.

[10]  L. J. Williams,et al.  Recent Advances in Causal Modeling Methods for Organizational and Management Research , 2003 .

[11]  Jerry N. Luftman Assessing It/Business Alignment , 2003, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[12]  Varun Grover,et al.  Shaping Agility through Digital Options: Reconceptualizing the Role of Information Technology in Contemporary Firms , 2003, MIS Q..

[13]  Mike Chiasson,et al.  Taking Industry Seriously in Information Systems Research , 2005, MIS Q..

[14]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  The Influence of IT Management Practice on IT Use in Large Organizations , 1994, MIS Q..

[15]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  An Update and Extension to SEM Guidelines for Admnistrative and Social Science Research , 2011 .

[16]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[17]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks , 1998 .

[18]  Blaize Horner Reich,et al.  IT alignment: what have we learned? , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[19]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Performance Impacts of Information Technology: Is Actual Usage the Missing Link? , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[20]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  The Antecedents of Information Systems Development Capability in Firms: A Knowledge Integration Perspective , 2003, ICIS.

[21]  P. Shrout,et al.  Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[22]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  J. Nunnally Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[24]  Nancy Bogucki Duncan,et al.  Capturing Flexibility of Information Technology Infrastructure: A Study of Resource Characteristics and their Measure , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Strategic Information Systems Planning Success: An Investigation of the Construct and Its Measurement , 1998, MIS Q..

[26]  Elena Karahanna,et al.  Antecedents of IS Strategic Alignment: A Nomological Network , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..

[27]  R. Kelly Rainer,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology Infrastructure Flexibility on Strategic Alignment and Application Implementations , 2003, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[28]  R. Grant Chapter 8 – Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 1999 .

[29]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[30]  Varun Grover,et al.  Types of Information Technology Capabilities and Their Role in Competitive Advantage: An Empirical Study , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[32]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Develop Long-Term Competitiveness through IT Assets , 1996 .

[33]  Husnayati Hussin,et al.  IT alignment and firm performance in small manufacturing firms , 2002, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[34]  Alexander Hars,et al.  Web Based Knowledge Infrastructures for the Sciences: An Adaptive Document , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Jerry N. Luftman,et al.  Key Issues for IT Executives 2009: Difficult Economy’s Impact on IT , 2010, MIS Q. Executive.

[36]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Measuring the Extent of EDI Usage in Complex Organizations: Strategies and Illustrative Examples , 1996, MIS Q..

[37]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Measuring the Linkage Between Business and Information Technology Objectives , 1996, MIS Q..

[38]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[39]  Arik Ragowsky,et al.  Relating Benefits from Using IS to an Organization’s Operating Characteristics: Interpreting Results from Two Countries , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[40]  Yolande E. Chan Why Haven't We Mastered Alignment? The Importance of the Informal Organization Structure , 2002, MIS Q. Executive.

[41]  Daniel Beimborn,et al.  IT Business Alignment and IT Usage in Operational Processes: A Retail Banking Case , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[42]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Factors That Influence the Social Dimension of Alignment Between Business and Information Technology Objectives , 2000, MIS Q..

[43]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[44]  Elena Karahanna,et al.  The Effect of Social Capital of the Relationship Between the CIO and Top Management Team on Firm Performance , 2013, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[45]  Thiagarajan Ravichandran,et al.  Effect of Information Systems Resources and Capabilities on Firm Performance: A Resource-Based Perspective , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[46]  Daniel Beimborn,et al.  When the river leaves its bed: analyzing deviations between planned and actual interaction structures in IT change processes , 2013, J. Inf. Technol..

[47]  Ram L. Kumar,et al.  A Framework for Assessing the Business Value of Information Technology Infrastructures , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[48]  John C. Henderson,et al.  Strategic Alignment: Leveraging Information Technology for Transforming Organizations , 1993, IBM Syst. J..

[49]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Novelty-Knowledge Alignment: A Theory of Design Convergence in Systems Development , 2012, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[50]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Executives’ Perceptions of the Business Value of Information Technology: A Process-Oriented Approach , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[51]  Tim Weitzel,et al.  How to Achieve Operational Business-IT Alignment: Insights from a Global Aerospace Firm , 2012, MIS Q. Executive.

[52]  Tony S. Wirjanto,et al.  Sustainability of a Firm's Reputation for Information Technology Capability: The Role of Senior IT Executives , 2013, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[53]  Straub,et al.  Editor's Comments: An Update and Extension to SEM Guidelines for Administrative and Social Science Research , 2011 .

[54]  J. Barney,et al.  CAPABILITIES, BUSINESS PROCESSES, AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: CHOOSING THE DEPENDENT VARIABLE IN EMPIRICAL TESTS OF THE RESOURCE-BASED VIEW , 2004 .

[55]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[56]  Donald R. Jones,et al.  Conceptualizing the Dynamic Strategic Alignment Competency , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[57]  David E. Avison,et al.  Using and validating the strategic alignment model , 2004, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[58]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Business Competence of Information Technology Professionals: Conceptual Development and Influence on IT-Business Partnerships , 2004, MIS Q..

[59]  Yolande E. Chan,et al.  Business Strategic Orientation, Information Systems Strategic Orientation, and Strategic Alignment , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[60]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[61]  Marcia J. Simmering,et al.  A Tale of Three Perspectives , 2009 .

[62]  Thompson S. H. Teo,et al.  Critical success factors in the alignment of IS plans with business plans , 1999 .

[63]  Peter Weill,et al.  alignment: Learning , 2022 .

[64]  Kevin McCormack,et al.  Business Process Orientation: Gaining the E-Business Competitive Advantage , 2001 .

[65]  Candace E Young-Ybarra,et al.  Strategic Flexibility in Information Technology Alliances: the Influence of Transaction Cost Economics and Social Exchange Theory , 1999 .

[66]  Kannan Srinivasan,et al.  Information Technology Impact on Process Output and Quality , 1997 .