Discrete Mutative Particle Swarm Optimisation of MFCC computation for classifying hypothyroidal infant cry

This paper describes the optimization of Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC) parameters using Discrete Mutative Particle Swarm Optimization (DMPSO) for diagnosis of hypothyroidism in infants. The MFCC was used to extract the feature set from infant cry signals. The features were then classified using Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP). The DMPSO variants optimize the number of filter banks and number of cepstral coefficients in MFCC. Based on the values chosen by DMPSO, the extracted features were then fed to 50 MLP classifiers (with different initial weight initialization values), which were trained to discriminate between healthy and hypothyroid infants. The results showed that DMPSO managed to produce classification accuracy of 88.7% with percentage convergence of 66.7% in detecting hypothyroidism from infant cry signals. The optimal number of filter bank and MFC coefficients were found to be 36 and 19 respectively.

[1]  Pichet Sriyanyong,et al.  A Hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization Solution to Ramping Rate Constrained Dynamic Economic Dispatch , 2008 .

[2]  Yoshikazu Fukuyama,et al.  A particle swarm optimization for reactive power and voltage control considering voltage security assessment , 2000 .

[3]  Orion F. Reyes-Galaviz,et al.  A System for the Processing of Infant Cry to Recognize Pathologies in Recently Born Babies with Neural Networks , 2004 .

[4]  N. Setian,et al.  Hypothyroidism in children: diagnosis and treatment. , 2007, Jornal de pediatria.

[5]  Michael N. Vrahatis,et al.  Recent approaches to global optimization problems through Particle Swarm Optimization , 2002, Natural Computing.

[6]  Takuji Nishimura,et al.  Mersenne twister: a 623-dimensionally equidistributed uniform pseudo-random number generator , 1998, TOMC.

[7]  Ihsan M. Yassin,et al.  NARMAX identification of DC motor model using repulsive particle swarm optimization , 2009, 2009 5th International Colloquium on Signal Processing & Its Applications.

[8]  R. Eberhart,et al.  Comparing inertia weights and constriction factors in particle swarm optimization , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC00 (Cat. No.00TH8512).

[9]  Ahmad Ihsan Mohd Yassin,et al.  Modification of particle swarm optimization algorithm for optimization of discrete values / Ahmad Ihsan Mohd Yassin, Muhammad Huzaimy Jusoh and Farah Yasmin Abdul Rahman , 2011 .

[10]  Daniele Peri,et al.  Particle Swarm Optimization: efficient globally convergent modifications , 2006 .

[11]  Donald Shaul Williamson,et al.  Automatic Music Similarity Assessment and Recommendation , 2007 .

[12]  Ahmad Ihsan Mohd Yassin,et al.  Novel Mutative Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm for Discrete Optimization , 2009, GEM.

[13]  A. S. Malowany,et al.  A comparison of neural network architectures for the classification of three types of infant cry vocalizations , 1995, Proceedings of 17th International Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[14]  I. M. Yassin,et al.  Optimization of MFCC parameters using Particle Swarm Optimization for diagnosis of infant hypothyroidism using Multi- Layer Perceptron , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[15]  James Brock Acoustic classification using independent component analysis , 2006 .