Nonrigid mammogram registration using mutual information

Of the papers dealing with the task of mammogram registration, the majority deal with the task by matching corresponding control-points derived from anatomical landmark points. One of the caveats encountered when using pure point-matching techniques is their reliance on accurately extracted anatomical features-points. This paper proposes an innovative approach to matching mammograms which combines the use of a similarity-measure and a point-based spatial transformation. Mutual information is a cost-function used to determine the degree of similarity between the two mammograms. An initial rigid registration is performed to remove global differences and bring the mammograms into approximate alignment. The mammograms are then subdivided into smaller regions and each of the corresponding subimages is matched independently using mutual information. The centroids of each of the matched subimages are then used as corresponding control-point pairs in association with the Thin-Plate Spline radial basis function. The resulting spatial transformation generates a nonrigid match of the mammograms. The technique is illustrated by matching mammograms from the MIAS mammogram database. An experimental comparison is made between mutual information incorporating purely rigid behavior, and that incorporating a more nonrigid behavior. The effectiveness of the registration process is evaluated using image differences.

[1]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Combining Single View Features and Asymmetry for Detection of Mass Lesions , 1998, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[2]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Non-rigid Registration of Breast MR Images Using Mutual Information , 1998, MICCAI.

[3]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  A survey of medical image registration , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[4]  Maha Yousef Sallam Image unwarping and difference analysis: a technique for detecting abnormalities in mammograms , 1997 .

[5]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  General multimodal elastic registration based on mutual information , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[6]  Christopher Choi,et al.  Mammogram registration using the Cauchy-Navier spline , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[7]  Bostjan Likar,et al.  A hierarchical approach to elastic registration based on mutual information , 2001, Image Vis. Comput..

[8]  R. N. Desmarais,et al.  Interpolation using surface splines. , 1972 .

[9]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Comparison and evaluation of rigid and nonrigid registration of breast MR images , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[10]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Alignment by Maximization of Mutual Information , 1997, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[11]  Robert Marti,et al.  Automatic Registration of Mammograms Based on Linear Structures , 2001, IPMI.

[12]  K Doi,et al.  Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: automated alignment of breast images and its effect on bilateral-subtraction technique. , 1994, Medical physics.

[13]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  A Non-Rigid Registration Algorithm for Dynamic Breast MR Images , 1999, Artif. Intell..

[14]  J. Weaver,et al.  Multiresolution elastic image registration. , 1998, Medical physics.

[15]  D. Rueckert,et al.  Comparison and evaluation of rigid, affine, and nonrigid registration of breast MR images. , 1999, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[16]  Heinrich Müller,et al.  Image warping with scattered data interpolation , 1995, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[17]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Principal Warps: Thin-Plate Splines and the Decomposition of Deformations , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[18]  Dennis M. Healy,et al.  Automated multiscale elastic image registration using correlation , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[19]  Robert Marti,et al.  A novel similarity measure to evaluate image correspondence , 2000, Proceedings 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. ICPR-2000.

[20]  Ian W. Ricketts,et al.  The Mammographic Image Analysis Society digital mammogram database , 1994 .