Multidimensional normative ratings for the International Affective Picture System

The purpose of the present investigation was to replicate and extend the International Affective Picture System norms (Ito, Cacioppo, & Lang, 1998; Lang, Bradley, & Cuthbert, 1999). These norms were developed to provide researchers with photographic slides that varied in emotional evocation, especially arousal and valence. In addition to collecting rating data on the dimensions of arousal and valence, we collected data on the dimensions of consequentiality, meaningfulness, familiarity, distinctiveness, and memorability. Furthermore, we collected ratings on the primary emotions of happiness, surprise, sadness, anger, disgust, and fear. A total of 1,302 participants were tested in small groups. The participants in each group rated a subset of 18 slides on 14 dimensions. Ratings were obtained on 703 slides. The means and standard deviations for all of the ratings are provided. We found our valence ratings to be similar to the previous norms. In contrast, our participants were more likely to rate the slides as less arousing than in the previous norms. The mean ratings on the remaining 12 dimensions were all below the midpoint of the 9-point Likert scale. However, sufficient variability in ratings across the slides indicates that selecting slides on the basis of these variables is feasible. Overall, the present ratings should allow investigators to use these norms for research purposes, especially in research dealing with the interrelationships among emotion and cognition. The means and standard deviations for emotions may be downloaded as an Excel spreadsheet from www.psychonomic.org/archive.

[1]  Peter J. Lang,et al.  Eliciting Affect Using the International Affective Picture System: Trajectories through Evaluative Space , 1998 .

[2]  S. Christianson Emotional stress and eyewitness memory: a critical review. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  R. Shepard Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures , 1967 .

[4]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Do different metamemory judgments tap the same underlying aspects of memory? , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  Gilles O. Einstein,et al.  Levels of processing and organization: Additive effects of individual-item and relational processing. , 1980 .

[6]  P. Ekman,et al.  Detecting deception from the body or face. , 1974 .

[7]  M. Bradley,et al.  Emotion, novelty, and the startle reflex: habituation in humans. , 1993, Behavioral neuroscience.

[8]  Donald H. Kausler,et al.  Psychology of verbal learning and memory , 1974 .

[9]  Jonas K. Olofsson,et al.  Affective picture processing: An integrative review of ERP findings , 2008, Biological Psychology.

[10]  P. Lang,et al.  International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Instruction Manual and Affective Ratings (Tech. Rep. No. A-4) , 1999 .

[11]  Nobuo Ohta,et al.  Remembering a nuclear accident in Japan: Did it trigger flashbulb memories? , 2005, Memory.

[12]  S. R. Schmidt,et al.  Can we have a distinctive theory of memory? , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[13]  G. Einstein,et al.  Relational and item-specific information in memory , 1981 .

[14]  Terry M. Libkuman,et al.  Source of arousal and memory for detail , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[15]  H. Otani,et al.  Memory for negatively arousing and neutral pictorial stimuli using a repeated testing paradigm , 2002 .

[16]  Nick Medford,et al.  Effects of normal aging and Alzheimer's disease on emotional memory. , 2002, Emotion.

[17]  H. Otani,et al.  Emotional stimuli, divided attention, and memory. , 2005, Emotion.

[18]  C. Noble An analysis of meaning. , 1952, Psychological review.

[19]  Eugene B. Zechmeister,et al.  Orthographic Distinctiveness as a Variable in Word Recognition. , 1972 .

[20]  M. Bradley,et al.  Remembering pictures: pleasure and arousal in memory. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  J. D. McGaugh,et al.  A Novel Demonstration of Enhanced Memory Associated with Emotional Arousal , 1995, Consciousness and Cognition.

[22]  E. S. Bartlett,et al.  Patterns of Emotions: A New Analysis of Anxiety and Depression , 1972 .

[23]  A. Mathews,et al.  Anxiety and Attention to Threatening Pictures , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[24]  Bennett L. Schwartz,et al.  Sources of information in metamemory: Judgments of learning and feelings of knowing , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  P. Lang Behavioral treatment and bio-behavioral assessment: computer applications , 1980 .

[26]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[27]  Roderick Hunt,et al.  The Enigma of Organization and Distinctiveness , 1993 .

[28]  James Kulik,et al.  Flashbulb memories , 1977, Cognition.

[29]  H. Otani,et al.  Arousal, valence, and memory for detail , 2004, Memory.

[30]  P. Lang International Affective Picture System (IAPS) : Technical Manual and Affective Ratings , 1995 .

[31]  D. G. MacKay,et al.  Emotion, Memory, and Attention in the Taboo Stroop Paradigm , 2005, Psychological science.

[32]  W. Davis,et al.  Properties of human affect induced by static color slides (IAPS): dimensional, categorical and electromyographic analysis , 1995, Biological Psychology.

[33]  M. Bradley,et al.  Motivated attention: Affect, activation, and action. , 1997 .

[34]  B. Underwood Individual and group predictions of item difficulty for free learning. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[35]  Peter J. Lang,et al.  Attention and Orienting : Sensory and Motivational Processes , 1997 .

[36]  L. Postman Verbal Learning and Memory , 1975 .

[37]  Larry Cahill,et al.  Epinephrine enhancement of human memory consolidation: Interaction with arousal at encoding , 2003, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[38]  M. McDaniel,et al.  The formation of flashbulb memories , 1994, Memory & cognition.