A Direct Consistency Improvement Method for the Probability-Hesitant Analytic Hierarchy Process

The consistency test is a vital component of pairwise comparison matrices if meaningful results are to be guaranteed, and it has been studied extensively, since the analytic hierarchy process was developed by Saaty. However, how to deal with the consistency of a probability-hesitant analytic hierarchy process with different probability values is a specific problem which needs to be studied further. This paper provides a direct consistency test and an improvement method for the probability-hesitant analytic hierarchy process. A paradox in Saaty’s consistency test is first proposed, and then a direct consistency improvement method is suggested for dealing with the consistency of a probability-hesitant analytic hierarchy process with different probability values, from the perspective of three tuples, rather than carrying out matrix operations. In our method, only simple mathematical calculations are needed and there is no need for matrix operations. By using a partial correction, the proposed method can retain most of the information provided by the original comparison matrix, and simultaneously indicate the modification direction and provide the optimal values. At the same time, using the proposed method, the inconsistent elements in the probability-hesitant pairwise comparison matrix can be found rapidly and with a high degree of accuracy. Moreover, our proposed iterative algorithm is a method that is both very quick and leads to good results being obtained.

[1]  Ding-Hong Peng,et al.  Generalized hesitant fuzzy synergetic weighted distance measures and their application to multiple criteria decision-making , 2013 .

[2]  Seyed Hassan Ghodsypour,et al.  A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming , 1998 .

[3]  Robert Lin,et al.  Note on group consistency in analytic hierarchy process , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Ahmed Frikha,et al.  Analytic hierarchy process for multi-sensor data fusion based on belief function theory , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  José María Moreno-Jiménez,et al.  The geometric consistency index: Approximated thresholds , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Yueh-Hsiang Chen,et al.  Applying fuzzy linguistic preference relations to the improvement of consistency of fuzzy AHP , 2008, Inf. Sci..

[7]  Eugene D. Hahn Decision Making with Uncertain Judgments: A Stochastic Formulation of the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2003, Decis. Sci..

[8]  Matthew J. Liberatore,et al.  An extension of the analytic hierarchy process for industrial R&D project selection and resource allocation , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[9]  Yucheng Dong,et al.  On consistency measures of linguistic preference relations , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  Steven A. Melnyk,et al.  Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: A study in the application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Dejian Yu,et al.  Some Hesitant Fuzzy Information Aggregation Operators Based on Einstein Operational Laws , 2014, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[12]  A. Stam,et al.  Stochastic Judgments in the AHP: The Measurement of Rank Reversal Probabilities , 1997 .

[13]  T. Saaty Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process , 1986 .

[14]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Consistency Measures for Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Relations , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[15]  Yuan-Duen Lee,et al.  Applying integrated DEA/AHP to evaluate the economic performance of local governments in China , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  Zhibin Wu,et al.  Possibility Distribution-Based Approach for MAGDM With Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Information , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[17]  Gang Kou,et al.  A cosine maximization method for the priority vector derivation in AHP , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Intensitas,et al.  Analytical Hierarchy Process , 2017 .

[19]  Xin Chen,et al.  Analyzing Saaty’s consistency test in pairwise comparison method: a perspective based on linguistic and numerical scale , 2018, Soft Comput..

[20]  Chunqiao Tan,et al.  Multiplicative consistency analysis for interval fuzzy preference relations: A comparative study , 2017 .

[21]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Consistency-based risk assessment with probabilistic linguistic preference relation , 2016, Appl. Soft Comput..

[22]  B. Farhadinia,et al.  A series of score functions for hesitant fuzzy sets , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[23]  V. Torra,et al.  A framework for linguistic logic programming , 2010 .

[24]  Francisco Chiclana,et al.  Multiplicative consistency of intuitionistic reciprocal preference relations and its application to missing values estimation and consensus building , 2014, Knowl. Based Syst..

[25]  R. W. Saaty,et al.  The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used , 1987 .

[26]  Matthew J. Liberatore,et al.  The analytic hierarchy process in medical and health care decision making: A literature review , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  Han-Lin Li,et al.  Detecting and adjusting ordinal and cardinal inconsistencies through a graphical and optimal approach in AHP models , 2007, Comput. Oper. Res..

[28]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Group Decision-Making Model With Incomplete Fuzzy Preference Relations Based on Additive Consistency , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[29]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets , 2011, Inf. Sci..

[30]  William Ho,et al.  Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications - A literature review , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[31]  Youichi Iida,et al.  ORDINALITY CONSISTENCY TEST ABOUT ITEMS AND NOTATION OF A PAIRWISE COMPARISON MATRIX IN AHP , 2009 .

[32]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets for Decision Making , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[33]  Fang Liu,et al.  Acceptable consistency analysis of interval reciprocal comparison matrices , 2009, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[34]  Zhibin Wu,et al.  A consistency and consensus based decision support model for group decision making with multiplicative preference relations , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[35]  Yi Peng,et al.  Ensemble of Software Defect Predictors: an AHP-Based Evaluation Method , 2011, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[36]  Peter Chu,et al.  ON VARGAS'S PROOF OF CONSISTENCY TEST FOR 3 × 3 COMPARISON MATRICES IN AHP , 2002 .

[37]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Interval-valued hesitant preference relations and their applications to group decision making , 2013, Knowl. Based Syst..

[38]  Yi Peng,et al.  Support A simple method to improve the consistency ratio of the pairwise comparison matrix in ANP , 2011 .

[39]  T. L. Saaty A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[40]  Shyi-Ming Chen,et al.  Group decision making systems using group recommendations based on interval fuzzy preference relations and consistency matrices , 2015, Inf. Sci..

[41]  Na Chen,et al.  Some Hesitant Fuzzy Aggregation Operators with Their Application in Group Decision Making , 2011, Group Decision and Negotiation.

[42]  Liu Wan A New Method of Rectifying Judgment Matrix , 1999 .

[43]  Vicenç Torra,et al.  On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems.

[44]  Yin-Feng Xu,et al.  Numerical scales generated individually for analytic hierarchy process , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[45]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Deriving a Ranking From Hesitant Fuzzy Preference Relations Under Group Decision Making , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[46]  Matteo Brunelli,et al.  Studying a set of properties of inconsistency indices for pairwise comparisons , 2015, Ann. Oper. Res..

[47]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  A VIKOR-based method for hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision making , 2013, Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making.

[48]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  An axiomatic approach to approximation-consistency of triangular fuzzy reciprocal preference relations , 2017, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[49]  William Ho,et al.  The state-of-the-art integrations and applications of the analytic hierarchy process , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[50]  John A. Keane,et al.  Inconsistency reduction in decision making via multi-objective optimisation , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[51]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Hesitant fuzzy entropy and cross‐entropy and their use in multiattribute decision‐making , 2012, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[52]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1980 .

[53]  Yejun Xu,et al.  A distance-based framework to deal with ordinal and additive inconsistencies for fuzzy reciprocal preference relations , 2016, Inf. Sci..

[54]  Zhibin Wu,et al.  Managing consistency and consensus in group decision making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations , 2016 .

[55]  Guiwu Wei,et al.  Hesitant fuzzy prioritized operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making , 2012, Knowl. Based Syst..

[56]  Hong-yu Zhang,et al.  Interval-valued hesitant fuzzy linguistic sets and their applications in multi-criteria decision-making problems , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[57]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making , 2011, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[58]  E. Rosenbloom A probabilistic interpretation of the final rankings in AHP , 1997 .

[59]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  On distance and correlation measures of hesitant fuzzy information , 2011, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[60]  Feng-Yi Ai,et al.  An approach to multiple attribute decision making problems based on hesitant fuzzy set , 2014, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[61]  G. Crawford,et al.  A note on the analysis of subjective judgment matrices , 1985 .

[62]  Da Ruan,et al.  A Multi-Attribute Comparison of Turkish Quality consultants by Fuzzy AHP , 2007, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[63]  Zhiming Zhang,et al.  Hesitant fuzzy power aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making , 2013, Inf. Sci..

[64]  X. Zeshui,et al.  A consistency improving method in the analytic hierarchy process , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[65]  Luis G. Vargas Reciprocal matrices with random coefficients , 1982 .

[66]  Lidija Zadnik Stirn,et al.  Acceptable consistency of aggregated comparison matrices in analytic hierarchy process , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[67]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Cardinal Consistency of Reciprocal Preference Relations: A Characterization of Multiplicative Transitivity , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[68]  Jen Tang,et al.  Distribution of Aggregate Utility Using Stochastic Elements of Additive Multiattribute Utility Models , 2000, Decis. Sci..

[69]  T. Saaty How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[70]  Fatemeh Zahedi,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process—A Survey of the Method and its Applications , 1986 .

[71]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  Consistency-Driven Automatic Methodology to Set Interval Numerical Scales of 2-Tuple Linguistic Term Sets and Its Use in the Linguistic GDM With Preference Relation , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[72]  Zhongsheng Hua,et al.  On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[73]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  DERIVING THE AHP 1-9 SCALE FROM FIRST PRINCIPLES , 2001 .

[74]  Wen-Chyuan Chiang,et al.  A decision support framework for internal audit prioritization in a rental car company: A combined use between DEA and AHP , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[75]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  A consistency improving method in the analytic hierarchy process , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[76]  Pedro Linares Llamas Are inconsistent decisions better? An experiment with pairwise comparisons , 2009 .

[77]  Saul I. Gass,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process - An Exposition , 2001, Oper. Res..

[78]  Dimitris K. Despotis,et al.  A min-max Goal Programming Approach to Priority Derivation in AHP with Interval Judgements , 2008, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[79]  Na Chen,et al.  Correlation coefficients of hesitant fuzzy sets and their applications to clustering analysis , 2013 .