Artificial Intelligence Applied to Osteoporosis: A Performance Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms in Predicting Fragility Fractures From MRI Data

A current challenge in osteoporosis is identifying patients at risk of bone fracture.

[1]  Florian Knoll,et al.  Artificial Intelligence in Musculoskeletal Imaging: Current Status and Future Directions. , 2019, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  Samuel K. Cho,et al.  Applications of Machine Learning Using Electronic Medical Records in Spine Surgery , 2019, Neurospine.

[3]  E. Barrett-Connor,et al.  Bone mineral density thresholds for pharmacological intervention to prevent fractures. , 2004, Archives of internal medicine.

[4]  Christian Kruse,et al.  Machine Learning Principles Can Improve Hip Fracture Prediction , 2017, Calcified Tissue International.

[5]  R. Regatte,et al.  Classification of sodium MRI data of cartilage using machine learning , 2015, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Steve Halligan,et al.  Disadvantages of using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to assess imaging tests: A discussion and proposal for an alternative approach , 2015, European Radiology.

[7]  Karl Pearson F.R.S. LIII. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space , 1901 .

[8]  U. Ferizi,et al.  Artificial intelligence, osteoporosis and fragility fractures. , 2019, Current opinion in rheumatology.

[9]  F. Wehrli Structural and functional assessment of trabecular and cortical bone by micro magnetic resonance imaging , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2003, Technometrics.

[11]  David J. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Machine Learning, Neural and Statistical Classification , 2009 .

[12]  Jeremy F Magland,et al.  Mechanical Implications of Estrogen Supplementation in Early Postmenopausal Women , 2010, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[13]  Stan Szpakowicz,et al.  Beyond Accuracy, F-Score and ROC: A Family of Discriminant Measures for Performance Evaluation , 2006, Australian Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

[14]  I. T. Jolliffe,et al.  Choosing a Subset of Principal Components or Variables , 1986 .

[15]  J. Kanis,et al.  Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: Synopsis of a WHO report , 1994, Osteoporosis International.

[16]  Joseph O. Deasy,et al.  Automatic classification of prostate cancer Gleason scores from multiparametric magnetic resonance images , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  P. Vestergaard,et al.  Clinical fracture risk evaluated by hierarchical agglomerative clustering , 2017, Osteoporosis International.

[18]  H H Bolotin,et al.  DXA in vivo BMD methodology: an erroneous and misleading research and clinical gauge of bone mineral status, bone fragility, and bone remodelling. , 2007, Bone.

[19]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[20]  Punam K. Saha,et al.  Three-dimensional digital topological characterization of cancellous bone architecture , 2000, Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol..

[21]  Janez Demsar,et al.  Statistical Comparisons of Classifiers over Multiple Data Sets , 2006, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[22]  Gregory Chang,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of Virtual Bone Strength Testing in Osteoporosis Screening Programs for Postmenopausal Women in the United States. , 2017, Radiology.