The Augmented Latent Class Model: Incorporating Additional Heterogeneity in the Latent Class Model for Panel Data

Marketing researchers have actively sought to account for the heterogeneity in households' preferences and responses to marketing-mix elements (e.g., price, promotion) when analyzing scanner-panel data. This is because not doing so biases response coefficient estimates that can potentially alter the conclusions drawn from such analyses. In this article, the authors present an extension to the latent class model (LCM) that accounts for additional heterogeneity by allowing households' preferences to be a continuous mixture of segment-level preferences. The authors show how their model generalizes the LCM by the mere addition of S + 1 parameters, where S refers to the number of segments. Because a limitation of the traditional LCM is that it does not adequately account for heterogeneity in responses across households, the authors' model mitigates this criticism leveled at the LCM. They then compare their model with the traditional LCM and the equivalent continuous mixture (random-effects) models in terms of model selection criteria and predictive ability. The results indicate that the authors' model outperforms both the LCM and the equivalent random-effects (logit) model on these criteria.

[1]  D. McFadden.  Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[2]  G. Schwarz.  Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[3]  W R Dillon,et al.  A Probabilistic Latent Class Model for Assessing Inter-Judge Reliability. , 1984, Multivariate behavioral research.

[4]  V. Srinivasan,et al.  A Simultaneous Approach to Market Segmentation and Market Structuring , 1987 .

[5]  George B. Macready,et al.  Concomitant-Variable Latent-Class Models , 1988 .

[6]  V. Srinivasan,et al.  An Approach for Tracking Within-Segment Shifts in Market Shares , 1989 .

[7]  Gary J. Russell,et al.  A Probabilistic Choice Model for Market Segmentation and Elasticity Structure , 1989 .

[8]  Dipak C. Jain,et al.  Estimation of Latent Class Models with Heterogeneous Choice Probabilities: An Application to Market Structuring , 1990 .

[9]  C. S. Poulsen.  Mixed Markov and latent Markov modelling applied to brand choice behaviour , 1990 .

[10]  Pradeep K. Chintagunta,et al.  Investigating Heterogeneity in Brand Preferences in Logit Models for Panel Data , 1991 .

[11]  Sunil Gupta,et al.  Brand Choice, Purchase Incidence, and Segmentation: An Integrated Modeling Approach , 1992 .

[12]  Russell S. Winer,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of Internal and External Reference Prices Using Scanner Data , 1992 .

[13]  Füsun F. Gönül,et al.  Modeling Multiple Sources of Heterogeneity in Multinomial Logit Models: Methodological and Managerial Issues , 1993 .

[14]  Pradeep K. Chintagunta,et al.  On Using Demographic Variables to Determine Segment Membership in Logit Mixture Models , 1994 .

[15]  Rabikar Chatterjee,et al.  Analyzing Constant-Sum Multiple Criterion Data: A Segment-level Approach , 1995 .

[16]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  The Value of Purchase History Data in Target Marketing , 1996 .

[17]  Dick R. Wittink,et al.  Do Household Scanner Data Provide Representative Inferences from Brand Choices: A Comparison with Store Data , 1996 .

[18]  Tülin Erdem.  A Dynamic Analysis of Market Structure Based on Panel Data , 1996 .

[19]  M. Wedel,et al.  Market Segmentation: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations , 1997 .

[20]  K. Srinivasan,et al.  Performance of the integrated random coefficients covariance probit model: Implications for brand choice , 1998 .

[21]  Greg M. Allenby,et al.  On the Heterogeneity of Demand , 1998 .

[22]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  Marketing models of consumer heterogeneity , 1998 .

[23]  GuptaSunil,et al.  Commercial Use of UPC Scanner Data , 1999 .

[24]  Sunil Gupta,et al.  Commercial Use of UPC Scanner Data: Industry and Academic Perspectives , 1999 .

[25]  Pradeep K. Chintagunta,et al.  Investigating Household State Dependence Effects across Categories , 1999 .

[26]  Rick L. Andrews,et al.  Parameter Bias from Unobserved Effects in the Multinomial Logit Model of Consumer Choice , 2000 .

[27]  John M. Olin,et al.  PRODUCT LINE MANAGEMENT AS DYNAMIC, ATTRIBUTE-LEVEL COMPETITION , 2001 .

[28]  Rick L. Andrews,et al.  An Empirical Comparison of Logit Choice Models with Discrete versus Continuous Representations of Heterogeneity , 2002 .